The IRGC announced the destruction
of three more F-35s in Jordan
August 1st, 10:44pm
(RT.ru)
The Iranian military has confirmed the destruction of
three more US F-35 fighter jets, at a base in Jordan.
This is reported by RIA Novosti with
reference to the IRNA agency.
According to the agency, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
(IRGC) Aerospace Force struck the base with several ballistic
missiles on the morning of August 1. The target was the
repair hangar and aircraft parking lot at Al-Azrak.
"As a result of the attack, three F-35 fighters were destroyed
and three others were damaged," the publication says.
Earlier, CBS News reported that the United States & Israel
are preparing massive strikes on Iran's energy facilities.
U.S. embassies in the Middle East - have urged their
citizens in the region to be prepared for evacuation.
_______________________________________________________
75 years of US malice: Iran warns US
against naval deception in Hormuz
August 1st, 9:44pm
(Al Mayadeen English)
Iran’s Foreign Ministry accuses the US of naval violations,
aggressive actions, and attempts to deceive Iran
in the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a series of statements
on Saturday accusing the United States of deceptive naval
operations in the Strait of Hormuz, violating maritime
agreements, and engaging in aggressive acts
against the Islamic Republic over the past
15 months.
Between June 26 and July 8, Iranian authorities observed
multiple instances of US frigates operating alongside
large vessels .....carrying oil or liquefied gas,
according to the ministry's statement.
"The American terrorist army repeatedly exploited commercial
vessels to transport military personnel, equipment, and war
machinery," the statement said. The ministry also asserted
that: the primary reason for the transit of vessels through
the southern route with tracking devices turned off was
"to avoid detection by the armed forces of the Islamic
Republic of Iran."
On July 8, a frigate belonging to US Central Command was observed
"taking cover behind a giant vessel loaded with liquefied gas" while
transiting through the "unsafe and unauthorized" southern route,
the statement added.
The ministry described the frigate's maneuver not merely as a
dangerous and irresponsible action regarding commercial
navigation safety, but said it.... "revealed America's
malicious intent and purpose ---- to exploit the
ceasefire understanding to pave the way
for hostile actions against Iran".
US response - to ship incidents
shows 'premeditated planning'
The Iranian Foreign Ministry further stated that the US response
to damage sustained by three ships constitutes a pattern of
premeditated hostility.
The statement said the US reaction was "disproportionate and
brutal," adding that this reaction came "under the pretext of
damage to ships that, firstly, have no connection to the
United States and, secondly, for which no evidence
has yet been presented, indicating an
Iranian attack".
The ministry also cited "the US president's statements regarding the
termination of the ceasefire understanding, the revocation of the
license to sell Iranian oil, and the return of the naval blockade".
According to the statement, these actions --- are "all clear and
undeniable indicators of the premeditated planning by the US
governing body to breach covenants, violate Iran's sovereign
rights in the Strait of Hormuz, and escalate tensions".
US actions - 'threat to
international peace
and security'
Furthermore, the ministry characterized US actions against Iran over
the past 15 months as meeting three specific definitions: "the threat
to international peace and security," "the breach of international
peace and security," and "the aggressive act."
The ministry said these designations "require the Security
Council to intervene to stop the aggressive acts and hold
the aggressors accountable".
However, the statement noted that "the Security Council has not
yet taken any effective action to fulfill its legal responsibilities
regarding the aggressions by the United States and the
Zionist entity".
It added that "the UN Secretary-General has not undertaken
any tangible action in this regard, beyond some vague and
equivocal statements".
'Nuclear Bomb Lie' ...used
as pretext for aggression
The ministry also accused the US governing body of relentless
hostility. "The US governing body has not hesitated over the
past two years to practice any evil against the Iranian
people and the Muslim peoples of the region.... to
satisfy the expansionist and colonial ambitions
of the occupying entity," the statement said.
It further asserted that the US initially used "the worn-out lie, of
'preventing the Iranian nuclear bomb'" as a pretext for military
aggression against Iran, while simultaneously raising
"laughable pretexts ---- such as 'confronting the
imminent threat of Iran' and 'a preemptive
operation in defense of Israel' to
justify its crimes".
The statement asserted, "Every sane person knows that the only
reason for the American-Zionist military aggression against Iran
is the insistence of the Iranian people on their independence
and national sovereignty ---- and their resistance to US
ambitions and pressures over the past half-century".
Iran vows to continue 'resistance'
------- as defensive strikes persist
"We express our appreciation for the valiant efforts undertaken
by the armed forces in defending the entity of Iran with full
capability," the statement said, affirming the Islamic
Republic's determination "to continue the path of
resistance and steadfastness --------- until the
complete defeat of the enemies' evils".
The ministry stated ----- that Iran's
defensive strikes remain ongoing.
"The defensive strikes of the Iranian armed forces -- continue at full
capacity, under conditions in which the American enemy continues
-- to breach its covenants in the implementation of the terms of the
memoranda of understanding by continuing the naval blockade on
Iranian ports & commercial navigation and the continuous waging
of brutal attacks on various parts of the country & the escalation
of economic pressures and illegal threats," the statement said.
Regarding the naval blockade, the ministry said, "The continuation
of the naval blockade, along with the brutal attacks on military
and non-military targets, civilian infrastructure, and Iranian
citizens inside and outside Iran, including in Iraq,
constitutes a flagrant violation of the United
Nations Charter."
It added, "The Islamic Republic of Iran will use all its tools
to exercise its inherent right to legitimate defense
against these aggressions".
75-years of United States malice
The ministry also addressed ---- what it
characterized as an historical pattern
of US hostility.
"The Iranian people will not forget the history of American malice
against them and the betrayal of the then-US governing body of
the Iranians' trust - and its participation in the criminal coup
against the government elected by the Iranian people and
the establishment of a dictatorial & repressive regime,"
the statement read.
It asserted that the new round of US military
aggression .....is a continuation of this
75-year enmity.
"The new round of US military aggression against Iran, which began
concurrently with the magnificent funeral ceremony for the pure
body of the martyred leader, under the pretext of responding to
alleged incidents involving three ships that were transiting
through an unsafe and unauthorized route in the Strait of
Hormuz and has continued to this day, is a continuation
of the 75-year-long enmity that has openly manifested
itself over the past two years," the statement read.
The ministry dismissed the pretext for the attacks. "The pretext of
the alleged incidents of three ships -- to attack Iran represents the
peak of misinformation and fabrication by the US governing body
and some of its regional allies to justify the breach of covenants
and the assault on Iran's sovereign rights in the Strait of
Hormuz," it said.
US used violations of MoU
to cover military activities
The statement further addressed the countries to which the ships
belong, saying that, "despite their knowledge of the provisions of
paragraph 5 of the memorandum of understanding and with the
knowledge that the route imposed by the United States in the
south of the Strait of Hormuz is unauthorized and unsafe,
proceeded to transit these 3 ships through that route".
The ministry said these actions, which are....... "provocative and
contrary to paragraph 5 of the memorandum of understanding,"
began shortly after the ceasefire understanding was signed
and coincided with a provocative statement by Marco
Rubio and the Gulf Cooperation Council foreign
ministers, adding that they "were the subject
of repeated protests by Iran."
The ministry concluded that "America's insistence and that of
some of its regional partners on transiting ships through the
southern route was not only to empty paragraph 5 of the
memorandum of understanding of its content - and to
disrupt Iran's fulfillment of its obligations --- but was
also a cover for military activities and movements".
Iran urges regional states to block
US, Israeli..... 'use of territory'
In an additional statement, the ministry reiterated its legal
position on self-defense and regional responsibilities.
"The continuation of the naval blockade and attacks on military,
non-military targets, and Iran's infrastructure constitutes an
instance of an 'aggressive act' and a violation of the UN
Charter, and Iran will use its right to legitimate self-
defense," the ministry said.
It also called on regional governments to act, stating, "Regional
governments have a legal, religious, and moral duty to prevent
the United States and the Zionist regime from using their
territory and facilities to attack Iran."
The ministry also clarified the scope of Iran's defensive operations.
"Iran's defensive strikes ---- against the origin of the United States'
illegal attacks are by no means considered an attack on regional
countries," the statement read.
Source: Al Mayadeen
__________________________________________
Israeli ''lawyer'': calls for
killing - all Palestinians
in occupied West Bank
August 1st, 5:57pm
(PressTV)
An Israeli lawyer has called for the killing of Palestinians in the
occupied West Bank if they refuse to live under Israeli rule
or leave the territory.
Yehuda Shimon made the remarks during an interview with the
BBC, published on Saturday at the Havat Gilad settlement
outpost in the northern occupied West Bank.
Shimon, a lawyer affiliated with an organization representing
Israelis arrested over violence against Palestinians,
defended attacks on Palestinian villages as
acts of retaliation.
Referring to the killing of a guard from the settlement outpost
during clashes between Palestinians and Israelis in the
village of Tal, he called for reprisals against several
Palestinian communities.
“After they killed one Israeli, we need to kill all the people
in Tal and Sarra, even Jit and Farata,” he claimed.
Shimon also alleged that the life of one Jewish person was
worth “10 million Palestinians.” When a BBC reporter
described the statement as racist, he responded
by saying, “This is the truth.”
He also criticized the Israeli cabinet and military, slamming
them for failing to use sufficient force against Palestinians.
“The Israeli [cabinet] and the Israeli army... don’t kill the
Palestinians, they just separate the people. Afterwards,
because they don’t kill Palestinians, the Palestinians
kill us,” he further claimed.
Shimon further said that Palestinians should be removed
from what he called an “all-Israeli territory”, including
the Gaza Strip.
“If we don’t wake up and remove them all from this area,
from all areas of Israel, even Gaza too, they will come
back again,” he said.
He concluded by saying that Palestinians had only two
choices if they wished to remain alive: accept Israeli
rule and “live quietly,” or leave for other Arab or
Muslim countries.
“If you don’t want to make peace with us, and you don’t
want to get out, I don’t have a choice: I must kill you,
and I will kill you all,” Shimon said.
As reported by the Palestinian Colonization and Wall
Resistance Commission, there were 3,488 incidents
of aggression by illegal settlers in the West Bank
in the first half of this year, causing the deaths
of 17 Palestinians.
A ceasefire that took effect last October ended
Israel’s two-year genocidal war on Gaza that
began on October 7, 2023.
The bloody onslaught killed over 73,000 Palestinians
and injured over 174,000 others, most of them
women and children, and caused wide-
spread destruction affecting 90% of
civilian infrastructure. The UN ----
estimates reconstruction costs
at approximately $70 billion.
At least 1,209 Palestinians have been killed and 3,943
others injured in Israeli attacks since the ceasefire,
according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.
_______________________________________
US mulling.. decrease in military footprint
in Kuwait due to Iran operations: Report
August 1st, 11:13am
(PressTV)
The Pentagon is evaluating the possibility of scaling back the US
military presence in Kuwait due to the substantial impact of
losses attributed to Iran’s retaliatory missile and drone
operations, according to a report.
“The attacks have made people in Kuwait think of the US presence
as a liability, but also as absolutely necessary to defend Kuwait,”
the Wall Street Journal quoted Douglas Silliman, a former US
ambassador to Kuwait, as saying.
He added, “I think they are trying to figure out
what the best way forward on defense is.”
For decades, Kuwait has served as a significant military base
for the United States, after the expulsion of the Iraqi army
by US forces in 1991.
Kuwait was utilized as a strategic launch point for the US invasion
of Iraq in 2003, and it continued to support US troops stationed in
the oil-rich Persian Gulf kingdom for the subsequent ten years.
Kuwait.. regarded the deployment of US troops as the most effective
means of safeguarding its interests, while simultaneously assisting
the US in demonstrating its military strength in the region.
Nonetheless, the relationship between Washington
and Kuwait City is currently under reassessment.
In response to the unprovoked war of aggression initiated by the
US and Israel against Iran in late February, the Islamic Republic
retaliated by launching extensive missile and drone strikes
targeting US bases and assets in Kuwait ..and various
Persian Gulf nations, which served as operational
bases for the assault.
Multiple attacks by the Iranian Armed Forces have significantly
impacted US military installations in Kuwait. One particular
strike in March resulted in the deaths of six US soldiers.
“The question really is, if the Iran war continues, whether that large
US presence still makes sense,” Elizabeth Dent, a fellow at the
Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and
a former Pentagon official, said.
On Friday, the Iranian Army targeted key US military facilities
at an air base in Kuwait with kamikaze drones in retaliation
for the latest US acts of aggression against Iran, including
a deadly attack on Qeshm Island.
The Army stated - that the strike was conducted in the 27th phase of
Operation Thunderbolt, responding to the recent acts of aggression
by the “terrorist US military” towards Iran, and its “ferocious
attack” on a residential property on Qeshm Island.
As per the statement, the Army’s explosive-laden drones attacked
fighter jet hangars, satellite communication systems, and
equipment depots at Ahmad al-Jaber Air Base
in Kuwait.
According to the Army, the base has been instrumental in US aerial
and surveillance operations, highlighting its function as one of the
“essential hubs of air support” for the US military.... in addition to
its operational role.
The statement denounced the US’ assault on residential areas in
Qeshm, labeling it “a clear breach of humanitarian principles”
and “yet another instance of the war crimes committed
by the treacherous enemy.”
____________________________________________
MI5 chiefs .....secretly lobbied UK government
to designate IRGC as ‘terrorist’ organization:
Report
August 1st, 6:51am
(PressTV)
MI5 directors secretly pushed for Britain’s decision to designate the
Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization
and helped the government adopt .......the draconian National
Security Act, a report says.
The report, published by The Grayzone on Friday, revealed that MI5
Director General Kenneth Douglas McCallum and former MI5 chief
Baroness Eliza Manningham-Buller privately worked to advance
the IRGC designation and expand state security powers...
before the measure was adopted.
McCallum discussed the proposed IRGC proscription with
then-Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper in 2023,
while acknowledging that its “direct operational
benefit” was likely to be “modest.”
Despite... recognizing the limited practical impact, McCallum
told Cooper that granting authorities such powers was still
“sensible to contemplate” as Britain debated whether to
formally proscribe the IRGC.
The leaked emails showed that the IRGC designation gained
momentum amid false claims by British security officials
that Iran had been involved in plots inside the UK,
including McCallum’s statements that MI5 had
disrupted multiple Iran-related threats -------
without disclosing any evidence.
The UK government officially designated the IRGC as a terrorist
organization on July 13, granting authorities expanded powers
to prosecute individuals for activities to support or promote
the group.... under Britain’s so-called terrorism laws.
The report also linked the intelligence campaign to the passage of
the National Security Act, a controversial law that expanded
government powers against activities considered threats
to national security.
In one leaked email, McCallum thanked Manningham-Buller for
helping secure the legislation, writing, “Many thanks for your
support (and stamina) in getting the NS Act over the line.”
The report said the legislation introduced offenses targeting
unauthorized disclosures of state information, while
parliamentary debates explicitly referenced
preventing future “WikiLeaks-type”
disclosures.
The Grayzone also cited warnings from lawyers involved in
drafting the legislation that the Act could have a “chilling
effect” on legitimate journalistic activity.
The leaked correspondence showed McCallum continued
promoting warnings about foreign threats, including
unfounded claims that Iran had carried out plots
against British targets.
In October 2024, Manningham-Buller praised McCallum’s
public security warnings, writing, “You could not have
hoped for fuller coverage. Hope it helps with SR,”
referring to the government’s spending review.
The report said the exchange highlighted how claims of foreign
threats were used to support calls for increased intelligence
resources, with the government later announcing a seven-
percent rise in spending ------- on domestic and foreign
intelligence operations.
Intelligent fools - bless them!