13 people were killed -- in an Israeli strike
on the city of Saida in southern Lebanon
November 18th, 9:52pm
(RT.ru)
An Israeli strike on the city of Saida in southern
Lebanon killed 13 people and injured
several others.
This is reported by Reuters with reference
to the Lebanese Ministry of Health.
The Israeli military claims.... to have struck a training
camp belonging to the Palestinian Hamas movement.
In turn, the Hamas statement says ------ that
Israel attacked a Palestinian refugee camp.
Earlier, it was reported that Lebanon
maintained a ban on Iranian flights
---- for security reasons amid
Israeli threats.
____________________________________________________________
‘Day of shame’: Ex-UN rights official
slams UNSC resolution on Gaza
November 18th, 5:06pm
(PressTV)
A former senior United Nations human rights official has
denounced the UN Security Council’s adoption of a
resolution backing a US plan for foreign forces in
the besieged Gaza Strip, describing the vote
as a "day of shame" for the world body.
In a social media post on Tuesday, Craig Mokhiber, former director
of the New York office of the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR), described the vote on the US resolution as
a "day of shame" for the world body .....and called it a
“colonial outrage.”
The former rights official further accused governments worldwide
of being “on their knees before the US empire and its violent
Israeli client.”
The US-drafted resolution was adopted on Monday with 13 votes
in favour, with two abstentions from Russia and China in the
15-member council.
The plan is based on US President Donald Trump's 20-point project
for Gaza's future, including only a singular line that envisions the
''possibility'' of a future Palestinian state.
It outlines a Trump-chaired "Board of Peace"... to oversee affairs
in the besieged Palestinian territory as a transitional authority.
It also authorizes an "international stabilization force" that
would ensure a "demilitarization" of Gaza.
Mokhiber also criticized the "horrific" resolution
--------- as a violation of international law.
Trump’s plan for Gaza ‘reminiscent of
colonial era practices,’ Russia says
Moscow says the plan sidelines Palestinians and
risks deepening the territory’s political division.
“This proposal has been rejected by Palestinian civil society
and factions, as well as by defenders of human rights and
international law --- everywhere,” Mokhiber said.
“The struggle for Palestinian freedom ------
will continue undeterred,” he emphasized.
The Hamas resistance movement and other Palestinian factions,
including Islamic Jihad, have condemned the resolution -- for
imposing an “international guardianship” over Palestinians.
“The resolution imposes an international guardianship mechanism
on the Gaza Strip, which our people and their factions reject,”
Hamas said.
“It also seeks to achieve the occupation’s objectives, which it
failed to accomplish through its brutal genocide,” he stated.
The Palestinian group criticized the resolution for “detaching the
Gaza Strip from the rest of Palestinian territory” in an attempt to
impose new realities - against the will of the Palestinian people.
The Islamic Jihad Movement also affirmed its rejection of the
US resolution, stating that it violates the Palestinian people’s
“right to self-determination.”
It further censured the use of humanitarian aid, as a tool of
pressure and noted that the resolution fails to hold Israel
accountable for the blockade of Gaza.
Critics and independent observers argue that the US draft seeks
to use the UN’s authority to normalize Israel’s genocide --- and
impose another foreign regime on Palestinians.
UN Security Council..... approves US plan
for Gaza, Hamas rejects UNSC resolution
Hamas has rejected the UNSC resolution, arguing that it imposes
international guardianship, does not address Palestinian rights,
and aims to disarm the resistance.
The plan is also criticized for operating outside recognized
international legal frameworks ---- establishing a parallel
order based on security control and external authority.
The diplomats said that the Americans could decide to go
forward unilaterally with a force from willing countries
that would not have the UN's backing.
Hamas and Israel agreed last month to the US-brokered
Gaza ceasefire, aimed at ending the latter’s two-year-
long genocidal war against Palestinians in the
besieged territory.
The truce took effect on October 10, but Israel has
continued to violate it by carrying out airstrikes,
incursions, shootings, and arrests.
_________________________________________
US Incitement Targets Lebanese Army Chief
----- After His Sovereign Stand Condemning
Israeli Attacks
November 18th, 4:52pm
(al Manar)
Washington’s unease is becoming increasingly evident as
the Lebanese Army maintains a clear, sovereign position
in describing Israeli aggression for what it is. Lebanese
media reported that the US abruptly canceled Army
Commander Gen. Rudolf Heikal’s scheduled visit
to Washington today, following a recent military
statement condemning Israel’s continuous
attacks on southern Lebanon and on
UNIFIL forces.
According to the same reports, US officials canceled all meetings
planned for the Army Chief, while the Lebanese Embassy in
Washington.... called off the reception organized in
his honour. Sources emphasized that the direct
cause was ---- “Washington’s objection to the
Army’s tone, which held Israel responsible
for destabilization without assigning any
blame to Hezbollah, at a time when the
United States regards Israel as a
principal ally.”
The statement — firmly rooted in national principles and on-
the-ground facts angered several prominent members of
Congress, prompting an internal debate over the future
of US assistance to Lebanon. The issue has now
reportedly been placed under the purview of
Secretary of State Marco Rubio - given his
role.... in shaping Washington’s evolving
policy toward Lebanon --- particularly
regarding Lebanon's Armed Forces.
In a sign of escalating political pressure, Republican
Senator Joni Ernst ---- wrote on X expressing
“disappointment” with the Lebanese
Army’s position.
What provoked Washington, however, was the very truth it sought to
suppress. On November 16, the Lebanese Army stated plainly that
“the Israeli enemy persists in violating Lebanese sovereignty and
causing instability,” adding that the Israeli enemy’s attack on a
UNIFIL patrol constituted “a dangerous escalation that
demands immediate action.”
Israel later admitted it had ''mistakenly''
fired on two UN peacekeepers.
UNIFIL --- through its spokesperson Candice Ardell --- also
voiced “deep concern”, over the repeated Israeli attacks.
The contrast --- between the Army’s statement and the rhetoric
emerging from Congress underscores a fundamental reality:
the problem does not lie in Beirut’s words - but in the US’s
discomfort - with any Lebanese position that identifies
Israel, for what it is — an occupying force engaged
in continuous aggression.
Source: Al-Manar Website
____________________________
Urgent
Israeli killed, 3 others hurt
in Gush Etzion attack:
Israeli media
____________________________
Israeli Occupation Forces ------ Conduct
Widespread Arrests Across West Bank
November 18th, 12:39pm
(al Manar)
The Israeli occupation forces (IOF) carried out a series
of raids in the West Bank last night and early Tuesday
dawn, arresting a number of Palestinian citizens.
According to local sources, the IOF arrested three citizens,
including two brothers, from different neighbourhoods
in Bethlehem.
In the village of Hindaza, southeast of Bethlehem, Israeli
occupation forces arrested two other brothers from
their home.
The IOF also stormed the Aida and al-Deheisha refugee camps,
though no arrests were reported in those incidents.
In the Ramallah and al-Bireh province, the Israeli occupation
forces arrested two young men after raiding their homes
in the al-Jalazon refugee camp and stormed several
other areas.
In Jenin, a young man was taken prisoner after a special
occupation Israeli occupation force raided his home
in the town of Meithalun.
In Nablus, the IOF stormed the city and surrounding towns,
where they reportedly ransacked multiple homes.
In the village of Odala, south of Nablus, Israeli occupation
soldiers raided a house and a store, confiscating security
camera recordings.
Source: Agencies (edited by
Al-Manar English Website)
___________________________________
South Lebanon: Municipal Worker Martyred
in Israeli Strike in New Ceasefire Violation
November 18th, 10:39am
(al Manar)
A Lebanese municipal worker was martyred on Tuesday
in an Israeli strike on south Lebanon, in a new violation
of the ceasefire that ended the brutal Israeli war on
Lebanon in late 2024.
Al-Manar correspondent reported an Israeli drone strike
on a Rapid vehicle in the southern town of Bint Jbeil.
Lebanese Health Ministry announced that
the strike in Bint Jbeil left one martyr.
Media identified the martyr as Ali Ibrahim Shaito, reporting
that he was heading to his work in the municipality...
as he was targeted by the Israeli drone.
The Union of Municipalities of Bint Jbeil District issued
a statement ---- in which it strongly condemned the
Israeli aggression.
Civil worker Ali Ibrahim Shaito was martyred in the Israeli
attack which targeted the citizen’s efforts in serving the
local community, the union’s statement read.
Elsewhere in the border town of Blida, an Israeli glider
targeted an excavator, causing it to catch fire,
according to our correspondent.
The Israeli enemy continues to bomb Lebanon, mainly the
country’s south, almost daily and maintains occupation
over five posts along the southern border - in violation
of a ceasefire deal reached following a brutal 66-day
Israeli war between September and November 2024.
In addition to the Israeli violations, the Lebanese State has
been subjected to unprecedented pressure by the US, the
first sponsor of the Zionist entity, to disarm Hezbollah.
Source: Al-Manar English Website
_____________________________________
Palestinian Factions Denounce
UN Resolution as Trusteeship
for Gaza
November 18th, 9:37am
(al Manar)
Hamas issued a statement on Tuesday condemning the US-drafted
UN Security Council resolution adopted the previous night. The
group asserted that the resolution “fails to meet the political
and humanitarian demands and rights of the Palestinian
people, particularly in the Gaza Strip.”
The statement continued, “It imposes a mechanism to achieve the
occupation’s objectives, which it could not accomplish through
its war of extermination” over the past two years.
Hamas indicated that the resolution “imposes an international
trusteeship mechanism on the Gaza Strip,” emphasizing the
rejection of this proposal by the Palestinian people and
their factions.
The statement further elaborated that “this resolution separates the
Gaza Strip from the rest of the Palestinian territories - and attempts
to impose new realities that disregard the fundamental principles
and legitimate national rights of the Palestinian people. This
deprives them of their right to self-determination and the
establishment of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem
as its capital.”
Regarding the resistance’s weapons, Hamas reiterated that they
are “linked to the existence of the occupation.” It stressed that
“any discussion on the issue of weapons --- must remain an
internal national matter, connected to a political process
---- that guarantees the end of the occupation, the
establishment of a state, and the right to
self-determination.”
While Hamas emphasized --- that resisting the occupation “by all
means is a legitimate right ---- guaranteed by international laws
and conventions,” it clarified that “assigning the international
force's tasks and roles within the Gaza Strip ---- including
disarming the resistance ----- strips it of neutrality and
transforms it ----- into a party to the conflict, on
behalf of the occupation.”
Hamas stressed that if any international force is established,
its presence must be limited to the border, “in order to
separate the forces and monitor the ceasefire.”
Islamic Jihad: US Decision
Constitutes Trusteeship
and Separation
For its part, the Islamic Jihad Movement announced its categorical
rejection of the resolution, asserting that it constitutes an
international trusteeship over the Gaza Strip. The
movement stated this is rejected by all the
components of the Palestinian people,
and their forces, because it “aims to
achieve goals - that the occupation
has failed to impose through its
repeated wars.”
The movement emphasized ---- that the danger of the resolution lies
in its attempt ------ to separate the Gaza Strip from the rest of the
Palestinian territories and to impose new political realities that
contradict the fundamental rights of the Palestinian people. It
described the resolution as a usurpation of the right to self-
determination --- and the right to resist the occupation ---
a right, it stated --- guaranteed by international laws
and conventions.
Islamic Jihad also asserted that imposing an American-backed
governing body, with international cover, on a part of the
Palestinian people without their consent, constitutes
a violation of international humanitarian law.
The UN Security Council adopted the US-sponsored resolution
endorsing President Donald Trump’s plan for the Gaza Strip
on Monday evening. The resolution, which passed with
13 votes in favour, calls for the deployment of an
international force - and the disarmament
of the Palestinian resistance.
Source: Palestinian media (edited
and translated by Al-Manar
English Website)
_____________________________________
The latest UN resolution on Gaza
...opens the door to controversy:
US welcomes it,
Hamas rejects it
November 18th, 8:36am
(al Manar)
The UN Security Council voted in favour of a US-drafted
resolution endorsing President Donald Trump’s Gaza
peace plan, which includes deploying an
international force and a path to a
Palestinian state.
Thirteen members of the Council voted for the text, which US
Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz described as “historic and
constructive.” Russia and China abstained, but neither
country used its veto power.
Waltz said, “Today’s resolution is another important step that will
enable Gaza to prosper and provide an environment that allows
Israel to enjoy security.”
However, Hamas said the resolution: “falls short
of the political and humanitarian demands and
rights of our Palestinian people.”
The movement added, “This resolution separates the Gaza Strip
from the rest of the Palestinian territories and attempts
to impose new realities that disregard our people’s
fundamental principles - and legitimate national
rights, thus depriving our people of their right
to self-determination and the establishment
of their Palestinian state, with Jerusalem
as its capital.”
The text, which underwent several revisions during
negotiations within the Council, endorses the plan
that led to the ceasefire on October 10.
The latest version of the text allows for the establishment of an
“international stabilization force that will cooperate with the
occupying power, Egypt, and the newly trained Palestinian
police to help secure border areas and disarm the
Gaza Strip.”
The “international stabilization force” will also work to
permanently disarm unofficial armed groups, protect
civilians, and establish humanitarian corridors.
The resolution also allows for the creation of a “Peace Council,”
a transitional governing body for Gaza, theoretically headed by
Trump, with its mandate extending until the end of 2027.
The draft states that once the Palestinian Authority implements
the required reforms and begins the reconstruction of Gaza,
“conditions may finally be in place for a credible path to
Palestinian self-determination and statehood.”
For his part... the Algerian representative to the United Nations,
Amar Benjamaa, said that amendments had been made to the
US draft resolution on Gaza to ensure fairness and balance,
noting that “Arab and Islamic countries supported the US
draft resolution.... in its final version.”
The Algerian representative, for his part, stressed the need to
respect “the decisions and choices of the Palestinian people
and their representatives, and to support the continuation
of the ceasefire in Gaza and the Palestinian people’s
right to self-determination.”
The UN Security Council adopted the US resolution
on President Trump’s plan to end the war in Gaza.
In a related context, Russia’s UN representative, Vasily Nebenzya,
expressed Moscow’s reservations about the US resolution on
Gaza, noting that it does not include any reaffirmation of
fundamental principles and resolutions, including the
two-state solution.
Nebenzya also pointed to several shortcomings in the resolution,
including “the absence in Trump’s plan of any reference to the
role of an international force in disarming Hamas, the lack of
a timeframe for the Palestinian Authority to extend its
control over Gaza, and the lack of clarity regarding
a peace council or an international force to
stabilize Gaza.”
The Council ...approved the resolution by a majority of 13 votes out
of 15, with two members abstaining, while the occupation forces
continue to bomb the Gaza Strip and demolish what remains of
its homes, despite the ceasefire agreement reached on the
tenth of last month, resulting in hundreds of Palestinian
martyrs and wounded, as well as restricting the entry
of food and medical supplies.
Source: Agencies (edited
& translated by Al-Manar
English Website)