US.. will lose foothold in West Asia
- and be forced out: Iran's Velayati
May 21st, 8:43pm
Al Mayadeen English
Iranian officials warn that the United States will be forced out
of West Asia amid escalating tensions following US-Israeli
aggression, while Tehran --- highlights its domestic unity.
Iran has issued a sweeping warning that the United States will
ultimately be forced out of West Asia, as tensions continue to
escalate in the aftermath of the US-Israeli aggression on Iran.
Ali Akbar Velayati.. senior advisor to the Iranian Leader on
international affairs, said the Islamic Republic - was fully
capable of confronting the United States independently,
adding that “Iran’s friends across the world know, and
its adversaries must also realize” ....its strategic
resilience - and its ability to confront the US
on its own.
He said Washington would “no longer have a foothold” in the
region and would eventually be compelled to withdraw,
framing the US presence in West Asia as part of a
broader pattern of geopolitical contestation...
and military and political pressure.
Velayati also accused the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain
of adopting “the worst positions” in relation to the US-
Israeli aggression on Iran.
Separately, he stated -- that Iraq’s Kurdistan Region maintains
close relations with "Israel", in contrast to Baghdad’s official
position, and suggested.... that the region has become a
logistical hub for Iranian Kurdish opposition groups.
Iran praises domestic unity -
amid US-Israeli threats
On the domestic level, the Iranian presidency - has rejected
claims that foreign-backed efforts to generate armed riots
have succeeded, insisting instead - that such attempts
have been defeated ---- by Iran's national unity and
public resilience.
Ismail Saghab Esfahani ----- who serves as an Iranian Vice
President and an advisor to the Iranian leadership, said
that “the enemies’ scheme to create chaos inside Iran
has failed,” attributing the current stability ----- to the
“steadfastness and resistance of the people.”
He added that Iranian citizens had also been the popular
support base during the US-Israeli aggression, framing
domestic cohesion as a decisive factor in countering
efforts to destabilize the country.
Large-scale demonstrations... have taken place across the
country over recent months ---- with a massive number of
Iranian citizens expressing support for the government
and condemning the US-Israeli aggression against
their country.
Crowds gathered nightly in multiple cities, presenting the
demonstrations as a show of rejection of the external
pressure ---- and solidarity with the state, amid the
heightened regional tensions.
Public demonstrations have served as evidence of domestic
unity, first rejecting armed riots and later --- withstanding
Israeli and US bombings.
Source: Agencies
___________________________________
Hezbollah unveils Ababil FPVs
deployed in its Southern
Lebanon operations
May 21st, 8:14pm
Al Mayadeen English
The Islamic Resistance in Lebanon continues its operations
along the Lebanese-Palestinian border ---- targeting Israeli
occupation forces’ troop gatherings and military vehicles.
The Islamic Resistance in Lebanon - Hezbollah carried out a
series of coordinated attacks on May 20 and 21, targeting
Israeli enemy army positions across several towns in
southern Lebanon -- using rocket barrages, artillery
shelling, and swarms of suicide drones, including
Ababil drones, a name taken from the Quranic
verse: (And He sent against them birds
[Ababil] in flocks).
Following are operations carried out on May 20:
At 12:00 pm and 4:00 pm, resistance fighters targeted an Israeli
artillery encampment in the town of Odaisseh in southern
Lebanon with a swarm of one-way attack drones.
At 2:20 pm, resistance fighters ---- targeted an Israeli artillery
position in the city of Bint Jbeil with a one-way attack drone.
At 3:30 pm, resistance fighters targeted an Israeli artillery
encampment in the town of Rcheif with a one-way
attack drone.
At 4:50 pm, resistance fighters - targeted a grouping of Israeli
vehicles and soldiers in the town of Haddatha with a swarm
of suicide drones.
At 6:50 pm, resistance fighters -- targeted a grouping of Israeli
enemy army vehicles and soldiers in the towns of al-Bayyada
and al-Naqoura with a swarm of one-way attack drones.
Following are operations carried out on May 21:
At 12:00 am, resistance fighters targeted groupings of Israeli
army vehicles and soldiers in the towns of Dibl and Rsheif
with rocket barrages.
At 12:10 am, resistance fighters targeted a grouping of
Israeli vehicles and soldiers in the town of al-Bayyada
with a rocket barrage.
At 12:30 am, resistance fighters targeted groupings of Israeli
army vehicles and soldiers in the town of Dibl and the
outskirts of the town of Haddatha with a swarm
of one-way attack drones.
Between 12:00 am and 02:00 am, resistance fighters carried out
a wide-scale fire raid on all positions of the Israeli enemy army
in the towns of Dibl and Rsheif ..and the outskirts of the town
of Haddatha, using one-way attack drones and heavy rocket
barrages in repeated waves.
At 9:20 am, resistance fighters targeted a grouping of Israeli
army soldiers near the riverbed on the outskirts of the town
of Deir Seryan with artillery shells and a rocket barrage.
At 10:45 am, resistance fighters targeted a grouping of Israeli
enemy army soldiers and vehicles in the town of al-Qawzah
with artillery shells.
At 12:00 pm, resistance fighters targeted an Israeli engineering
vehicle at Khallet al-Raj in the town of Deir Seryan with an
FPV, achieving a confirmed hit.
At 12:10 pm, resistance fighters targeted a grouping of Israeli
enemy army vehicles and soldiers in the town of Rsheif with
a swarm of Ababil FPVs.
At 3:35 pm, resistance fighters targeted an Israeli Namer vehicle
in Dibl town ----- with an Ababil FPV, achieving a confirmed hit.
At 6:55 pm and 7:00 pm, resistance fighters targeted groupings
of Israeli enemy army vehicles and soldiers near the port of
the town of al-Naqoura and in the town of Tayr Harfa with
a swarm of Ababil FPVs, achieving confirmed hits.
Also at 6:55 pm and 7:00 pm, resistance fighters targeted
groupings of Israeli enemy army vehicles and soldiers
in the towns of al-Naqoura and Dibl with a swarm of
one-way attack drones.
Hezbollah's FPV drones expose Israeli military crisis
On a related note, Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported earlier
today that Israeli military commanders and settlers in the
north - are experiencing deep frustration and anger over
military and political stagnation on the Lebanon front,
amid the continued confrontations with Hezbollah,
along the border.
The newspaper reported that the Israeli military was "marking
time on a secondary front", unable to advance or impose a
new security reality, while Hezbollah continued to dictate
the pace of the fighting.
The newspaper cited military sources -- saying that explosive
FPV drones operated by Hezbollah using fibre-optic systems
had become the leading cause of injuries among the Israeli
troops... with the military unable to find technological or
electronic solutions....... to intercept them.
Source: Hezbollah - Military Media
______________________________________
IRGC Navy coordinates safe passage of
31 commercial vessels through the
Strait of Hormuz
May 21st, 4:15pm
(PressTV)
The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) says
31 commercial vessels, including oil tankers and
container ships, have safely passed through the
Strait of Hormuz over the past 24 hours under
the coordination and protection of its Navy
despite unprecedented insecurity caused
by the “terrorist US military” in the
Persian Gulf region.
“Despite the aggression of the terrorist US military and the
creation of unprecedented insecurity in the Persian Gulf
- particularly in the Strait of Hormuz - the IRGC Navy
sought to establish a clear and secure route, for
the passage and continuation of global trade,”
reads their statement.
The Iranian authority controlling the Strait of Hormuz in the
Persian Gulf has defined the supervisory management
zone of the waterway, announcing on Wednesday
that movement through the strategic corridor
requires coordination - and a permit.
The Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA) said in a post on its
official X account that the management zone ---- is "the line
connecting Mount Mubarak in Iran and southern Fujairah
in the United Arab Emirates, on the eastern side of the
strait ...extending to the line connecting the end of
Qeshm Island in Iran and Umm Al Quwain in the
United Arab Emirates, on the western side of
the strait."
"Movement within this area -- for passage through the Strait
of Hormuz requires coordination" with the PGSA...... "and
obtaining a permit from this body," the authority added.
Iran shut down the waterway to enemies and their allies in
retaliation for the latest round of unprovoked aggression
by the United States and Israel.
Tehran began applying stricter controls --- after US President
Donald Trump announced on April 13 the continuation of an
illegal naval blockade of Iranian vessels and ports, which
Iran said violated the terms of a ceasefire ---- Trump had
unilaterally announced ---- earlier that month.
Iran introduced the PGSA as a new institutional mechanism
to regulate and oversee vessel traffic through the strait.
In its first post on X, the authority said the account
would provide real-time updates on operations in
the waterway ---- and developments related to
maritime transit management.
Iranian officials said the new communication channel is part of
a wider operational system designed to improve coordination
with commercial shipping.
Under the mechanism, vessels intending to pass through
the strait receive direct electronic notifications outlining
any applicable rules, regulations, and procedural
requirements ...before transit.
________________________________
Barakah ------ false flag: How Israeli drones
targeted UAE nuclear plant to frame Iran,
unleash nuclear catastrophe
May 21st, 2:06pm
by Ivan Kesic
(PressTV)
A drone strike on an electrical generator just outside the inner
perimeter of the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant in the United
Arab Emirates on May 17, 2026, suddenly brought the
Persian Gulf to the brink of an environmental and
nuclear catastrophe.
Iranian military sources have confirmed -- what the evidence
overwhelmingly suggests: the attack was carried out by the
Israeli military in a calculated provocation designed to
push the UAE toward greater hostility against the
Islamic Republic of Iran.
The UAE now finds itself at the epicentre of a dangerously
escalating crisis following the attack on its only nuclear
power facility, which, if breached, could irradiate the
entire region.
While Emirati officials have made veiled accusations pointing
toward Iran, couched in ambiguous statements about the
drones' origin, a sober examination of the technical
evidence - tells a different story. The flight path
impossibilities, the operational sophistication
required, and the consistent, decades-long
pattern of US-Israeli false-flag operations
across the Persian Gulf region ---- all
converge on a single point.
Iranian military sources --- have explicitly identified the Zionist
regime as the perpetrator. The attack serves Israeli interests,
with surgical precision: driving a wedge between Iran and its
Persian Gulf Arab neighbours, sowing regional discord, and
creating a pretext for further escalation, all while the
regime in Tel Aviv celebrates the chaos
and destabilization.
The Barakah plant, situated on the UAE's far western coast near
the Saudi border, is not an ordinary industrial site. It houses
thousands of kilograms of nuclear material. Any direct hit,
or even a well-placed strike on its supporting
infrastructure.... could have triggered a
catastrophic release of radioactivity,
poisoning the entire Persian Gulf.
The consequences would not have respected borders: Iran's
own coastline, from Asaluyeh to Bandar Abbas, would have
been among the first to suffer. This -- was not an attack on
the UAE alone. It was an attack on the Persian Gulf itself.
Attack on Barakah nuclear plant
and official UAE statements
The Barakah Nuclear Energy Plant sits in Abu Dhabi's Al Dhafra
region, approximately 225 kilometres west of the UAE capital,
hard against the Saudi border. Its location is strategic and
so is its vulnerability.
Construction work on the facility began in 2012.... and the first
reactor became commercially operational in 2021. Today, the
facility boasts four advanced APR-1400 pressurized water
reactors, developed in South Korea, each capable of
generating 1,400 megawatts of electricity.
According to the Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation ---- the
plant's reactors produce 40 terawatt-hours annually, meeting
roughly 25 percent of the UAE's total electricity needs. It is
a cornerstone of the country's energy strategy ....and its
flagship nuclear achievement.
The environmental benefits are substantial: the plant saves
up to 22.4 million tonnes of carbon emissions each year,
equivalent to removing 4.8 million cars from the roads.
But beneath these impressive figures lies a sobering
reality. Those same reactors house thousands of
kilograms of nuclear material. What powers the
Emirates ----- could also poison it.
On May 17, Abu Dhabi authorities responded to a fire that
broke out in an external electrical generator located
outside the plant's inner perimeter, a critical
component whose destruction could
cascade into larger systems.
Officials insisted there was no impact on radiological safety
levels and that all units continued operating normally.
But the official narrative began to fray almost immediately. The
UAE Ministry of Defense claimed that its air defense systems
intercepted three drones that had entered Emirati airspace.
Two were successfully destroyed, the ministry said. The
third ------ struck the generator.
And then came the telling detail – one that speaks louder than
any statement. For the first time in several weeks, the UAE
Defense Ministry did not claim.... that the drones had
entered the country from Iran.
Previous allegations of Iranian origin had never been confirmed
by Iran's Armed Forces. The absence of the usual accusation,
was itself an admission. And the evidence, as Iranian military
sources confirm, points not east to Iran, but west to Tel Aviv.
IAEA assessment of the attack's grave implications
On May 19, 2026, the Director General of the International
Atomic Energy Agency addressed the United Nations
Security Council. His assessment was stark ---
and deeply alarming.
The IAEA chief confirmed that a drone strike on the morning
of May 17 caused a fire in an electrical generator located
outside the inner perimeter of the Barakah plant.
Radiation levels remained normal and no
injuries were reported.
On the surface, these details offered a narrow sigh of relief.
But he then laid bare the true gravity of what nearly
transpired. He made clear that a direct hit on the
Barakah Nuclear Power Plant could result in a
very high release of radioactivity into
the environment.
Even a strike that merely disabled the power supply lines to
the plant, he explained, could increase the likelihood of
reactor core melts, the nightmare scenario --- that
nuclear safety regimes are designed to prevent.
A meltdown at Barakah would not be a local
problem but a regional catastrophe.
In their worst cases, both scenarios would necessitate urgent
protective actions: mass evacuations, population sheltering,
and the distribution of stable iodine tablets to prevent
thyroid cancer. The reach of such measures would
extend from a few kilometres to several hundred
kilometres. Radiation monitoring would need to
cover distances.... of hundreds of kilometres.
Food restrictions - would likely need to be
imposed across multiple countries.
The IAEA chief did not stop at technical warnings. Attacks
on nuclear facilities devoted to peaceful purposes are
unacceptable, he said, consistent with IAEA General
Conference resolutions. He added that such
attacks are even more dangerous when
directed against operating nuclear
power plants – whether
Zaporizhzhya, Kursk,
Bushehr, Barakah,
or any other.
Nuclear power plants, he noted, are protected
under international humanitarian law.
He then called for maximum restraint, stating that military
attacks against nuclear power plants and other nuclear
facilities ---- carry undeniable risks.
The message was clear: the world came closer than it knows
to a nuclear environmental disaster in the Persian Gulf. And
the only reason the catastrophe was avoided was not that
the attack was minor, but because the drone struck a
secondary target rather than the core itself. That
is not a measure of safety.
Iranian military sources identify
Israeli responsibility
An informed Iranian military source has delivered a decisive and
informed assessment of the May 17 drone attack on the UAE's
Barakah nuclear facility: it was the handiwork of Israel.
The source, cited by a local news agency, said the Zionist
regime is deliberately seeking to push the UAE toward
deeper, more negative involvement in the region –
against Iran and other Islamic nations. It is an
operational reading of enemy intent.
He further noted that the UAE has engaged in various malicious
actions over the past three months, while Iran, for its part, has
clearly announced the operations it has carried out against
the UAE, for its direct and indirect involvement in the
recent war against Iran.
Transparency, in this context, is a form of warning. The same
cannot be said of Tel Aviv. Some of the attacks targeting the
UAE, the source emphasized, were also conducted by the
Israeli regime – operating in the shadows, using proxies
and false flags, always to maximize regional chaos
while minimizing its own exposure.
The military source then delivered a blunt strategic advice to
Abu Dhabi. The UAE should realize – more clearly than ever
before – that friendship with the child-killing Israeli regime
brings neither security nor economic benefit. Instead, it
inflicts severe damage on the Arab country's security,
economy, and regional reputation.
The source ------ further reaffirmed Iran's consistent position: the
Islamic Republic harbors no hostility toward any country in the
region. On the contrary, Iran has repeatedly called on regional
states to collectively ensure the security of this strategic
part of the world, and to utilize their abundant resources
for the welfare of their peoples, rather than squandering
them on imported wars and foreign-backed adventurism.
This assessment ---- is not new. It aligns with earlier Iranian
diplomatic communications. On May 15, 2026, just two
days before the drone strike, Iranian Foreign Minister
Abbas Araghchi stated during a BRICS meeting that
the UAE had stood alongside the United States and
the Israeli regime ---- during the recent aggression
against Iran.
He added that he had personally advised the UAE
representative that neither the Zionist regime
nor the United States can bring security
to the Emirates.
Technical contradictions - in Emirati claims
The UAE Ministry of Defense did not directly accuse any
regional actor of responsibility for the attack. Instead,
it offered two pieces of information: first, that the
drone struck the power plant from the western
border; second, that it was launched from
Iraqi territory, along with the two other
alleged downed drones.
This constitutes a subtle, indirect accusation
against Iran, channeled through its allies
in the Iraqi Axis of Resistance.
There is a problem, however. The second official
Emirati claim is inconsistent with the first. And
both are technically unfounded, as the
assessment reveals.
The Barakah nuclear power plant is located on the far western
coast of the UAE, relatively close to Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Any drone targeting the facility, would have followed one
of two possible flight paths: either over the Persian Gulf
from the north, or over the Saudi mainland from the
west and south.
Consider the first option. An attack launched from Iranian soil
would require the drone to arrive over the sea from the north.
Yet Emirati officials themselves have denied this scenario,
explicitly citing the western border as the point of origin.
In other words, not from Iran – from Saudi Arabia, a
country ......conspicuously absent from the
ministry's announcement.
Now consider the second option, combined with the claim that
the drone's flight originated in Iraq. This represents a serious
and unspoken indictment of Riyadh. It would mean that the
drone flew over ....at least 800 kilometres of the Saudi
mainland, traversing the more densely populated
and energy-critical eastern coastline, a region
blanketed by radar systems ---- without
triggering any reaction - from Saudi
air defenses or the Royal Saudi
Air Force.
Kamikaze drones are indeed difficult to detect by radar due to
their small cross-section and low-altitude flight, but that very
difficulty - cuts against the Emirati claim.
If the drone was so hard to track, then tracing its origin to Iraq
– a distance of approximately 1,000 kilometres – becomes
virtually impossible. The UAE cannot simultaneously
argue that its radars identified the launch point and
that the drone was too stealthy to be intercepted
along a 1,000-kilometre path.
The UAE operates several layers of air-defense radars..... with
vastly different ranges. That layered architecture is designed
precisely to prevent such ambiguities. Yet the official
narrative leaves more questions than answers,
however indirectly ---- toward uncomfortable
truths about regional airspace, complicity,
and ---- the real actors behind the attack.
The UAE's long-range AN/TPY-2 radar, integrated with the
THAAD missile-defense system, can reportedly detect
ballistic missiles at roughly 1,000 to 2,000 kilometres
- under optimal conditions. General air-surveillance
radars like the Ground Master 400 typically track
aircraft out to about 470 to 515 kilometres.
Patriot system radars, used for engagement and fire control,
usually operate in the 150 to 300-plus kilometre range,
depending on target type and altitude.
None of these radars can detect the launch or low-altitude
flight of a small kamikaze drone originating in Iraq. That
is a technical fact, not a matter of interpretation.
Even if the Emiratis possessed precise intelligence from Iraq
about the exact time and location of the drone's launch, a
highly unlikely scenario given the operational security of
such attacks, a more fundamental question remains.
Why would Abu Dhabi not inform its Saudi neighbours that a
hostile drone would be traversing at least 800 kilometres
of the Saudi mainland, flying freely for up to five hours,
without any reaction from Saudi air defenses? The
absence of such a notification... is telling.
What can be determined with certainty - is this: the drone attack
was indeed carried out from the western border and over Saudi
territory. And, there is no evidence – technical or otherwise –
to support the claim that it was launched from Iraq.
Now consider Iran's position. The Islamic Republic operates its
own nuclear power plant, Bushehr, on the Persian Gulf coast.
Both Bushehr & Barakah are used exclusively for electricity
production. Both operate under IAEA supervision. Both
incorporate international management – Russian at
Bushehr, South Korean at Barakah. Neither can
be diverted for military purposes. Tehran has
consistently denounced US-Israeli attacks
on the Bushehr nuclear complex and has
never labeledthe Emirati Barakah plant
as a hostile target.
The strategic logic is irrefutable. Radiation from a damaged
Barakah nuclear power plant would not respect borders. It
would affect every country in the Persian Gulf region –
including Iran itself. The plant sits on the coast at
the widest part of the Persian Gulf, between Iran,
the UAE, and Qatar, where sea currents....
move counterclockwise.
That means radioactive contamination would particularly
affect the Iranian coast between Asaluyeh and Bandar
Abbas ------ the country's most important energy,
transport, natural, and tourist coastal zone.
Tehran -- has no conceivable interest in attacking a facility
whose destruction would directly poison its own shores.
The only parties ------with both the capability and the
incentive to carry out such a strike -- are those
who would remain... untouched by its
radiological consequences -- and
who stand to benefit from the
regional chaos ------ that
would follow.
US-Israeli false flag campaign
using cloned Iranian drones
Since the launch of the US-Israeli military aggression against
Iran on February 28, a parallel shadow war...... has emerged
across the Persian Gulf, one fought, not with conventional
arsenals, but with cloned weapons designed to deceive.
As Iranian armed forces continued to conduct retaliatory strikes
on US and Israeli strategic and military assets, a sophisticated
network involving the US, the Israeli regime and Ukraine, have
deployed ------ hundreds of replica Shahed-136 attack drones
against the infrastructure of Persian Gulf states.
These attacks, confirmed by multiple Iranian military sources
and documented through the recovered wreckage, represent
a calculated strategy ---- with a single purpose: to fracture
regional unity and draw Iran's neighbours.. into a direct
confrontation with the Islamic Republic.
The central objective of the US-Israeli false-flag campaign ---- is
as simple as it is destructive. Convince the Arab states of the
Persian Gulf - that Iran is attacking their sovereign territory.
Provoke military retaliation and transform the current US-Israeli
aggression against Iran into a full-scale regional war, exactly
what the enemy could not achieve through direct military
confrontation. The Iranian military authorities ----- have
documented this strategy with increasing specificity,
noting that the enemy.. having failed to achieve its
stated objectives on the battlefield has resorted
to trickery and deception.
From a distance, the cloned drones are visually and audibly
indistinguishable from Iran's original Shahed-136 loitering
munitions. They share ---- the distinctive delta-wing
configuration. They emit the same characteristic
pusher propeller engine sound. They fly - the
same low-altitude profile that has become
familiar across conflict zones from
Ukraine to the Persian Gulf. To
the naked eye and ear, they
are identical.
But Iranian military intelligence has identified a crucial
distinction. These drones are not Iranian. They are
produced under the designation Lucas, by US
arms contractors.
Spektre Works unveiled this Shahed replica at a Pentagon
event as early as summer 2025, months before the
current aggression began. The Lucas drone, was
explicitly designed to emulate the Iranian model
at a comparable cost point, of approximately
$35,000. That price point is not accidental.
It is sufficient....... to create plausible
deniability when debris fields are
examined by non-specialists -
while low enough to enable
their mass deployment.
It leverages --- the very success of Iran's indigenous drone
program --- against the Islamic Republic itself. The
Shahed's reputation as a battle-proven, cost-
effective weapon... has been turned into a
weapon of confusion. The more effective
the original ---- the more plausible the
counterfeit. And the more regional
states misattribute the attacks.
Ukrainian arms manufacturers have spent years reverse-
engineering captured Shahed-136 airframes. By early
2026, the Ukrainian industry had developed the
capability ------ to produce Shahed-compatible
drones using authentic Iranian components
harvested from battlefields.
The Batyar drone – Ukraine's domestically produced Shahed
copy – shares the same delta-wing configuration, engine
type, and flight characteristics as the original Iranian
system. But the real deception lies deeper.
Harvested components from captured Shahed-136 airframes,
including engines, flight control modules, and navigation
systems ---- complete with authentic Iranian
manufacturing marks, are incorporated
into new airframes.
This component re-use means that - even when debris is
recovered - the presence of Iranian-manufactured parts
appears to confirm Iranian origin. Only comprehensive
forensic analysis – which includes examining serial
number ranges, component wear patterns --- and
firmware signatures - can reveal the deception.
And such analysis takes time, expertise, and
political will that is rarely available in the
immediate aftermath of an attack.
False-flag attacks and sinister objectives
The pattern of attacks falsely attributed to Iran - escalated
sharply in early March 2026, coinciding precisely with the
onset of US-Israeli aggression against Iranian territory.
Saudi Arabia reported multiple drone incursions, including
the interdiction of 13drones over Riyadh and the Eastern
Province. The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC)
issued a categorical denial ----- of any connection to
these strikes.
Drone strikes targeted fuel storage tanks at the port of Salalah
in Oman. The Iranian Embassy responded through social
media to refute claims of Iranian responsibility, calling
it a false-flag operation. The response was swift,
public, and unambiguous.
Kuwait has also been targeted. An attack on Kuwait
International Airport's radar system - represented
a particularly dangerous escalation. Civilian
aviation infrastructure is not – and has
never been – a legitimate target for
Iranian military operations.
The Barakah attack fits seamlessly into this established
pattern of US-Israeli false-flag attacks. The objective is
consistent: turn regional opinion against Iran while the
Zionist regime's hands remain hidden.
_____________________________________
Iran to Europe: Learn from Nazi
experience ---- after Ben-Gvir’s
humiliation of humanitarian
activists
May 21st, 12:55pm
(PressTV)
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman has called on European
nations to learn from the Nazi era, warning that history's
harsh lesson will repeat itself if the West continues to
remain silent ---- in the face of Israel’s systematic
humiliation of the humanitarian activists..
seeking to break the siege of Gaza.
In a post on X on Thursday, Esmaeil Baghaei described the
images ...of Israeli minister of so-called internal security
Itamar Ben-Gvir at Ashdod Port, personally humiliating
handcuffed humanitarian activists — many of them
European citizens — as "profoundly shocking."
“They evoke the darkest echoes of history— moments when
a regime, long protected from accountability, comes to see
itself as exceptional, untouchable, and above the law,”
he noted.
Baghaei recalled that in the 1930s, Europe comforted itself
with the illusion that it could remain silent and immune in
the face of a systematic degradation of human dignity,
international law, and basic moral principles -------
without ever paying a price.
"History delivered a brutal lesson," he said, adding that the
normalization of lawlessness and atrocity -- never remains
confined.. to its original target.
The spokesman noted that today's real danger
extends beyond any certain conduct by an
Israeli official.
"The deeper issue ---- lies in the complicit silence, passive
acceptance, and institutionalized inaction, vis-à-vis the
occupation, apartheid, and genocide -------- that have
granted such policies and behaviour ........an
appearance of normalcy, continuity, and
growing audacity," he wrote.
Baghaei warned that if the West continues to widen the gap
between its proclaimed core values and its actual conduct,
it will -- once again -- have to learn history's harsh lesson.
"Endless impunity does not moderate lawlessness — it
normalizes atrocity and emboldens its perpetrators,"
he said further.
The Global Flotilla of al-Sumoud announced on Tuesday that
Israel has confiscated all 50 ships carrying activists and
humanitarian aid to Palestinians. The flotilla included
428 activists from 44 countries and had set sail
from Marmaris, Türkiye.
Ben-Gvir released a humiliating video showing the abduction of
al-Sumoud activists, who were apprehended in international
waters ------- forced to their knees - with their hands bound.
The abductees of the humanitarian flotilla aimed at breaking
the siege of Gaza were transferred to Ashdod port after
their ships were seized in the international waters
of the Mediterranean Sea.