Pentagon plans US ground troop
deployment to force Hezbollah
disarmament: Report
June 30th, 2:34pm
(PressTV)
The Pentagon is, reportedly, preparing to deploy US ground
troops to Lebanon --- to implement the recently signed and
controversial US-brokered ''agreement'' between Lebanon
and Israel, which calls for the disarmament of Hezbollah.
Citing US officials, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday
that US forces would be stationed in Lebanon to monitor
compliance with the agreement by both Lebanon
and Israel.
According to the report, US troops.. would also
be deployed in the Israeli-occupied territories.
The newspaper added that officials from the US Central
Command (CENTCOM) would report any violations of
the so-called ceasefire agreement directly to the
Trump administration. It noted -- however, that
CENTCOM chief Admiral Brad Cooper would
not ---- take a direct role in overseeing
the agreement.
The report came as Cooper visited Beirut on Monday,
where he met Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and
Army Commander Rodolphe Haykal to discuss the
implementation of the agreement’s security
provisions. CENTCOM later said Cooper
also visited Israel during the trip.
Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri says the
agreement signed in Washington, is an imposed
set of dictates rather than an agreement that
safeguards Lebanon.
The agreement, signed in Washington last week, requires
the Lebanese army.... to oversee the disarmament of
Hezbollah and other “non-state armed groups”
ahead of a phased Israeli "withdrawal"
from southern Lebanon.
Hezbollah has rejected the agreement as “null and void,”
warning that attempts to impose it ---- could trigger
internal unrest.
The resistance group reiterated on Monday - that it reserves
the right to self-defense as Israeli forces continue attacks
on southern Lebanon in blatant violation of the ceasefire.
Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem has also
described the US-brokered agreement as “a gratuitous
concession” to Israel and “a stab in the back of
the resistance.”
Instead, he called for the implementation of the Iran-US
memorandum of understanding (MoU) --- whose first
provision calls for a permanent end to hostilities
across all fronts, including Lebanon.
Iran has repeatedly urged the United States to compel Israel
to halt its attacks on Lebanon and fully withdraw from the
areas it occupies under a Tehran-Washington agreement
signed on June 17.
Tehran has maintained that all provisions of the MoU,
including those relating to Lebanon, must be
fully implemented.
____________________________________________
Mission unaccomplished – Part VII:
US war goal shrank from ''ending
Iran's civilization''.... to just
reopening Hormuz Strait
June 30th, 2:05pm
By Press TV Website Staff
The Strait of Hormuz has long been described.... as the world's
most vital maritime chokepoint - situated between the Persian
Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, effectively within Iranian territorial
waters. Approximately 20% of global petroleum consumption
passes through its narrow waters, making it an artery of the
global economy.
But for Iran, the Strait is far more than a strategic waterway. It
is the ultimate expression of sovereignty - the most powerful
instrument of deterrence, and the strategic trump card that
forced the United States to acknowledge a new regional
reality - after the recent war.
Throughout the 40-day war - imposed on Iran, the Strait of
Hormuz emerged as the decisive factor that transformed
battlefield gains ........into diplomatic leverage for the
Islamic Republic.
It was closed from a position of Iranian authority immediately
after the US-Israeli war machine resorted to unprovoked and
illegal military aggression ...amidst nuclear talks.
It was reopened, from a position of Iranian authority, after
the Iranian and US presidents signed a memorandum of
understanding to formally end the US-Israeli war ----
on all fronts.
And in both acts, Tehran demonstrated that control over this
critical energy route belongs unequivocally to the Islamic
Republic, not to the United States, not to its allies, and
not to any international arrangement that fails to
recognize Iran's sovereign rights.
The imposed war made this clear, and
the memorandum of understanding
formalized it.
The strategic significance of the Strait
For decades, US strategists assumed that the Strait of Hormuz
could be secured through military might, that the presence of
the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, the network of occupation
bases across the Persian Gulf, and the projection of
US naval power would guarantee the free flow of
oil ...regardless of Iran's preferences.
This assumption ---- was always flawed,
and the recent war exposed its fallacy.
The Strait of Hormuz is not merely a body of water, but the
gateway through which the energy wealth of the Persian
Gulf reaches global markets – from South Asia to Europe
and beyond. Each tanker that passes through its waters
bears not just oil but the economic vitality of countries
dependent on these energy exports.
Control over this chokepoint translates into leverage over
global energy prices, economic stability, & the strategic
calculations of every major power. Iran's geographic
position, straddling the Strait along its entire
northern coast, grants it a natural
advantage - that no amount of
US military hardware....
can neutralize.
When Iran closed the Strait during the recent imposed war, the
global oil markets reacted with immediate - and sustained -
shock. Prices surged dramatically and supply chains
were disrupted. The economic consequences
rippled across continents, reminding the
world that the stability of the global
energy system ------- rests on US
behaviour in the region.
The reopening: A concession, not a gift
The reopening of the Strait was not a unilateral concession
from Iran. It was the outcome of a strategic calculation in
which Iran secured tangible benefits for restoring the
energy route.
The United States.. having failed to achieve its military
objectives and facing mounting economic pressure at
home, found itself in a position - where it needed the
Strait reopened far more than Iran needed it closed.
This asymmetry of urgency became the
foundation upon which Iran built
its negotiating leverage.
The MoU reflected this reality. Iran's sovereignty over the Strait
was not merely acknowledged, but it was formalized in clear
terms. The provisions governing maritime traffic, the
mechanisms for ensuring compliance, and the
recognition of Iran's rights were all shaped
by the strategic reality that the Strait of
Hormuz is not a global commons to be
managed by external powers ---- but
Iranian territorial waters, subject
to Iranian authority.
This represents a fundamental reversal of the strategic
dynamic that had prevailed for decades. In the past,
the US could threaten to close the Strait to Iran.
Today, Iran holds the power to open or close it,
and the US must negotiate..... to ensure its
continued accessibility. The shift.... is not
merely tactical but structural. The Strait
of Hormuz is now a source of Iranian
power rather than a vulnerability to
be exploited by adversaries.
A card to consolidate battlefield gains
The Strait of Hormuz was never a negotiating tool --- but the
mechanism through which Iran consolidated its battlefield
achievements. Throughout the war, the Iranian forces
demonstrated their ability to strike US bases with
precision, to repel aggression, and --- to defend
Iranian territory against overwhelming odds.
But military success, however impressive,
must be translated into political
outcomes to be sustained.
The Strait ....provided
that translation.
By linking the reopening of the energy route - to the broader
terms of the understanding, Iran ensured that the strategic
gains achieved on the battlefield ---- were not lost at the
negotiating table. The terms of the understanding,
including the recognition of Iran's nuclear rights,
the preservation of its missile and drone
capabilities, and the commitment to
end hostilities on all fronts, were
all reinforced by Iran's control
over the Strait.
The message was clear: the US could not expect the free
flow of oil through the Strait ...while simultaneously
denying Iran its fundamental rights.
This integration of military capability and diplomatic
leverage represents one of the most sophisticated
strategic achievements in modern Iranian history.
The Strait of Hormuz ...thus serves - as a force multiplier
that enhances every aspect of Iran's strategic posture.
It provides Tehran ...with a sustainable means of
ensuring its security.. obtaining compensation
for war damages, and securing the country's
economic prosperity.
It transforms Iran from a reactive power into a determining
regional superpower capable of shaping the region's
political and economic trajectory.
The implications for regional security
The era in which ''external powers'' could impose their will on
the region without regard for Iranian interests - has
effectively ended. The Strait of Hormuz... now
serves as both a symbol and an instrument
of this new reality.
Every country that depends on Persian Gulf energy exports,
must now recognize that Iran's cooperation is essential for
stable access to global markets. Every power - that seeks
to project military force into the region must accept that
Iranian sovereignty over the Strait is a red line that can
not be crossed --- without a cost.
The understanding between Iran and the US has formalized
this new arrangement. But -- the true significance of the
Strait of Hormuz lies not in any diplomatic document
but in the strategic reality it represents.
Iran has demonstrated that it possesses the capability, the will,
and the strategic sophistication to use its geographic position
as a source of enduring power. The US, by contrast, has
demonstrated that its ability to project force into the
region... does not translate into control over the
region's most vital strategic assets.
A victory consolidated
The Strait of Hormuz ---- is now a strategic trump card that has
transformed Iran's military resilience into diplomatic leverage.
Its closure and reopening from a position of Iranian authority
has established a new strategic reality – Iran's sovereignty
over the Strait is non-negotiable, its control over the
energy route is absolute, and its willingness to
use this leverage ---- is beyond question.
The 40-day war may have been imposed on Iran... but what
happened after that ---- was dictated by Iran. Through the
intelligent and resolute exercise of sovereignty over the
Strait of Hormuz, Iran ------- has secured a position of
enduring strength that no amount of US military
pressure can reverse.
The energy route will work on Iranian terms from now on.
Even allies such as Oman cannot bypass these terms
and designate a corridor through it without taking
Iran into confidence. And that is the most
powerful message of all: in the new
regional order, power flows
through the Strait of
Hormuz, and Iran
holds the keys
to the gate.
_________________________________________
Israeli army demolishes buildings
across Gaza ---- as ceasefire
violations continue
June 30th, 11am
(PressTV)
The Israeli army has demolished buildings and civilian
structures in northern and southern Gaza, as artillery
shelling and heavy gunfire were reported in multiple
areas, according to local sources and witnesses.
The demolitions occurred on Tuesday amid what
continuing Israeli violations of the ceasefire
that took effect on October 10, 2025.
According to local sources and witnesses, Israeli forces
carried out three large-scale demolition operations
targeting remaining homes and structures
northeast of the city of Khan Yunis
in the southern Gaza Strip.
The operations coincided... with heavy gunfire from Israeli
military vehicles. Witnesses also reported Israeli artillery
shelling northwest of the city of Rafah in southern Gaza.
In northern Gaza, witnesses said they heard a massive
explosion caused by an Israeli demolition operation
near the al-Sanafour junction in the al-Tuffah
neighbourhood, east of Gaza City.
Israeli military vehicles also opened heavy fire east of the
al-Tuffah and Shujaiya neighbourhoods in the city, while
residents reported additional explosions in areas
under Israeli control.
The latest demolitions come as Israeli forces
have expanded their control over parts of
the Gaza Strip - in recent weeks.
According to local accounts, the Israeli troops have moved
concrete barriers westward along the so-called "Yellow
Line," widening the restricted zone ------- and forcing
additional Palestinian residents to flee.
Israeli forces remain deployed along the zone, a security
buffer inside the Gaza Strip that prevents Palestinians
from accessing nearby areas.
Both the ceasefire and the zone were envisioned as part of a
US-proposed plan to supposedly end the war of genocide
that the Israeli regime had begun against Gaza -------
in October 2023.
The plan, however, stopped far short of securing necessary
commitments from the regime, which is currently reported
to be controlling over 70% of the Palestinian territory.
According to Gaza's health ministry, Israeli ceasefire
violations since the truce took effect.. have killed
1,045 Palestinians and injured 3,380 others,
most of them women and children.
The ministry also said that since October 8, 2023, when the
regime began the genocide, more than 73,000 Palestinians
have been killed --- and over 173,000 others wounded
across the coastal sliver --- while about 90% of
the territory's civilian infrastructure ..has
been destroyed.