Logo: Rhondda Records logo 2

Rhondda Records Home Page

Image: we're back!

Image: People hold up a banner as they protest against Israel at the entrance of the International Criminal Court.

 Palestine Action activist at risk of death

 after beginning thirst strike in UK jail

January 24th, 6:40pm

 (PressTV)

 

Muhammad Umer Khalid, 22, is set to refuse fluids on January 

24, 2026 if his demands, including immediate bail, are not met.

 

A British campaign group has warned that a detained Palestine 

Action activist could die after stepping up his protest to a 

thirst strike, 13 days after resuming a hunger strike. 

 

Muhammed Umer Khalid, who suffers from the rare genetic 

disorder Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy, faces 

“heightened risks” due to his condition, 

according to the campaign group 

Prisoners for Palestine. 

 

Khalid has reportedly told prison staff not to

 intervene .........if he loses consciousness.

 

Dr. Rupa Marya, speaking through the group, said that with no 

fluid intake, “typically people die of acute kidney failure and 

other derangements within 3 to 4 days.” She added that 

with Khalid’s underlying condition, he is “at increased 

risk of death - even sooner.”

 

“By Monday, if the UK government continues to stall, we can 

expect this young man to be well in the process of dying

 if not dead,” Marya warned.

 

Khalid is calling for immediate bail, an end to censorship in 

prison, and a full inquiry into British involvement in Israel’s 

genocidal war in Gaza. He also demands the release of 

surveillance footage from British Royal Air Force (RAF) 

spy flights over Gaza on April 1, 2024, when British

 aid workers were killed in an Israeli attack.

 

Khalid said he only escalated to a thirst strike after 

his attempts to engage the government on these 

issues.... were ignored. 

 

In December, he paused a 12-day hunger strike - due to 

his declining health. His trial is scheduled for January 

2027, by which time he will have spent a year and a 

half in prison.

 

Prisoners for Palestine warned that several activists who 

ended a 73-day hunger strike in recent weeks are now 

experiencing symptoms of refeeding syndrome, a

 potentially life-threatening condition that can 

occur when food is reintroduced after 

prolonged malnutrition. 

 

Several hunger strikers have been hospitalized 

since the protests began on November 2.

 

Palestine Action activists are facing charges they deny, 

linked to actions carried out before the group was 

banned as a “terrorist organization” by the 

UK government.

 

Since the ban, hundreds across the UK - have been arrested 

for opposing the proscription and holding placards reading,

 “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

 

The campaigners say the charges are politically motivated 

--- intended to silence opposition to the UK government’s 

support for Israel.

 

 

____________________________________________________________

Hezbollah supporters to stage mass rally 

in Lebanon - to show solidarity with Iran, 

protest threats against Ayat. Khamenei

January 24th, 4:01pm

 (PressTV)

 

The Hezbollah resistance movement has called upon thousands

of its supporters to stage a mass rally in Lebanon in a show 

of solidarity with Iran, and to express their strong protest 

against the threats against the Leader of the Islamic 

Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

 

According to a report published by the Lebanese al-Manar 

television station, the group urged people from all strata 

of Lebanese society to gather at Sayyid al-Shuhada 

Complex in the southern suburbs of Beirut on 

Monday afternoon.

 

Hezbollah expressed its solidarity with the Islamic Republic 

of Iran, its wise leadership, and the noble nation --- in the 

face of the US-Israeli sabotage and acts of terror.

 

The group also categorically denounced

 threats against Ayatollah Khamenei.

 

Late last month, economic hardships, caused and exacerbated 

by years of Western sanctions, triggered a wave of peaceful 

protests among merchants in Tehran and other cities.

 

The authorities recognized the protesters' demands as 

legitimate, but the demonstrations were hijacked by 

rioters backed by US and Israeli leaders, who 

publicly called for vandalism and disorder.

 

Officials said that some of the mercenaries were armed, 

trained, and recruited by US and Israeli spy agencies 

to incite violence, damage public property, and kill 

civilians and members of the security forces.

 

In a post on his account on the social media platform X 

on Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi 

highlighted the destruction of public property 

during the foreign-backed unrest, that also 

left thousands dead.

 

“Mayhem of the recent terrorist operation in Iran: 

 

(the destruction of) 305 ambulances and buses; 24 gas stations; 

700 convenience stores; 300 private homes; 750 banks; 414 

government buildings; 794 police stations; 120 Basij 

centres; 200 schools; 350 mosques; 15 libraries; 2 

Armenian churches; 253 bus stations; 600 ATTs; 

800 private cars; Total death toll: 3,117: 

Civilians and security forces: 2,427; 

Terrorists: 690,” Araghchi said.

 

 

____________________________________________________________

 

 

Why Western left fails to grasp the link 

between imperialism, Zionism, and 

‘regime change’ in Iran

January 24th, 3:12pm

 by David Miller

 

When the Israeli spy agency Mossad called for riots in Iran 

on its Farsi-language social media on January 1, almost 

no one in the West took notice.

 

Yet the very next day, former US Secretary of State Mike 

Pompeo made his famous intervention, openly calling 

for riots in Iranian cities and wishing a Happy New 

Year to “every Iranian in the streets – and “also

 to every Mossad agent walking beside them.”

 

After that, there was little justification for critics of Western 

foreign policy to ignore the role of foreign intelligence 

agencies and terrorist elements, in the events 

that followed.

 

Nevertheless, a widespread reluctance persists to confront 

the involvement of Mossad – and indeed the CIA and MI6 – 

in the two days of riots between January 8 and 9.

 

The Western left has largely failed to understand the “regime-

change” alliance linking Mossad, Pahlavist monarchists, the 

cult-like terrorist group Mujahedin-e Khalq and a wide array 

of CIA-backed “opposition” groups – almost all based in 

the US, with a smaller presence in the UK .....and 

across Europe.

 

Few have grasped that Britain’s MI6 has also played a role in 

this sinister “regime-change” project targeting Iran. Instead, 

many on the Western left tend to interpret these attempts 

as a “freedom struggle,” viewing them as expressions of 

popular agency, or even as a working-class or trade-

union uprising. They are not.

 

What follows.... is an examination of the multifaceted errors, 

misunderstandings, and intellectual degradation displayed 

by far too many leftists – from the liberal and secular left 

to the revolutionary left, including those who claim to

be anti-Zionist or supporters of the Palestinian

 liberation movement.

 

Before proceeding, however, it is necessary to briefly outline 

the correct framework for understanding the role of the

Islamic Republic of Iran.

 

It is the world’s leading anti-imperialist state, and the tip of the

spear in the struggle for the liberation of Palestine. One need 

not take my word for this, nor even that of Sayyed Ali 

Khamenei, or General Qasem Soleimani.

 

Instead, one should listen to the words of the leaders 

of the Palestinian Resistance themselves.

 

Here is the martyr Yahya Sinwar --- in 2019: “If not for Iran’s 

support for the resistance in Palestine, we would not have 

obtained these capabilities [rockets and the technical 

means to produce homegrown rockets]. Indeed, our 

[Arab] nation has deserted us in our difficult 

moments, while Iran has supported us 

with weapons, equipment 

and expertise.”

 

And here is the former Hamas chief, Martyr Ismail 

Haniyeh, on International Quds Day --- in 2020.

 

“The essence of strategy --- is the resistance project. Complete 

resistance, including the armed military resistance at the top. 

From here, I salute all the components of the nation that 

embrace and support the choice of resistance on the 

ground in Palestine. I am particularly specifying the 

Islamic Republic of Iran, which has not faltered in 

supporting and funding the resistance financially, 

militarily, and technically. This is an example of 

the Republic’s strategy that was established 

by Imam Khomeini, may God have mercy 

on his soul."

 

Against the Islamic Republic (and the Palestinian Resistance) 

are, first and foremost, the Zionist colonists in Palestine and 

their main supporters, the US and the UK. 

 

We also need to note the Iranian self-styled "opposition," which 

takes the form of the monarchist supporters of the former 

Shah who want to install his son as the new king. Then 

there is the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MKO, aka People’s 

Mujahedin of Iran/National Council of 

Resistance of Iran)

 

The MKO is a designated terrorist group based in Albania,

a NATO member state, where it maintains a troll farm 

alongside other operational infrastructure.

 

It was removed from the US list of terrorist organizations in

 2012 ---- following an extensive lobbying campaign 

supported by Zionist lobby networks.

 

In June 2023, Albanian police raided the group’s premises, 

seizing around 150 computer devices. The raid followed 

the China-brokered rapprochement between Iran and 

Saudi Arabia, after which Riyadh, having long 

denied any connection to the MKO, was 

forced to withdraw its backing.

 

The Saudis had also denied funding the anti-Islamic Republic 

media outlet, Iran International, but once the agreement 

mediated by China was signed - financial support was

abruptly cut and the channel’s London office closed.

 

Several months later, however, a new London office was opened 

after fresh funding was secured from the Zionist entity, which 

continues to bankroll the propaganda outlet to this day.

 

The case of Iran International highlights the broader ecosystem

 of external opposition groups targeting Iran. Many of these are 

financed through deniable intermediaries such as the National 

Endowment for Democracy & a network of affiliated agencies.

 

Journalist Alan MacLeod has recently documented several of 

these organizations in MintPress, including Human Rights 

Activists in Iran / Human Rights Activists News Agency,

the Abdorrahman Boroumand Center for Human Rights

in Iran, and the Centre for Human Rights in Iran. 

There are, however, many more such entities 

operating within this parallel infrastructure.

 

Leftist take on Iran

 

We should begin with those “leftists” who have historically held 

deeply flawed positions on “regime change” and the roles of 

the CIA, MI6, and Mossad.

 

Many are already familiar - with the limitations of figures such 

as Bernie Sanders, who spoke of an “abhorrent regime” and 

praised the “incredible courage” of Mossad-directed 

“protesters”; or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, often 

scathingly referred to by critics as “AOCIA”; or 

Jeremy Corbyn, who stated that he was 

“appalled by the killing of protesters”; 

or Zarah Sultana, who declared, 

 

“The images of body bags leave no doubt about the brutality 

of Iran’s repression, and a communications blackout

 is indefensible.”

 

In the UK, Owen Jones, Michael Walker of Novara Media, 

and many others followed the same pattern. For those 

who remain unconvinced on these points, I suggest 

consulting the sources linked in the 

preceding statements.

 

The “Mullahs”, the “Ayatollahs” and the “Islamists”

 

Part of the problem is that Islamophobia runs deep within 

the left. Often disguised... as morally upright secularism,

 a closer look reveals much more beneath the surface.

 

Back in 2017, I co-edited a book on Islamophobia -- which 

proposed a theory identifying five pillars of Islamophobia. 

 

Alongside Western states, neoconservatives, the Zionist 

movement, and the far-right, we argued that a fifth pillar 

was found within certain elements of leftist, secular, 

and feminist movements.

 

In the book, we examined the so-called pro-war left, the New 

Atheists, feminist groups, and strands of secularism. Back 

then, we concluded that:

 

It is clear that, while some within these groups did not initially 

set out, to campaign against the oppressive conditions faced 

by Muslims in the West, many have ultimately ended up there.

 

In this sense, we describe these movements as “social 

movements from above,” whose trajectories.... have 

effectively aligned them with other Islamophobic 

currents – whether intentionally or not.

 

However, the problem on the Western left runs much deeper.

 It permeates the core of anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist 

movements and is evident across the so-called 

‘revolutionary’ left.

 

Thus, beyond the “pro-war left,” when it comes to Iran, we must 

also critically examine the anti-war and pro-Palestine left.

 

Many on the left hold anti-theist and anti-Islamic views. Perhaps

 tentatively at first, they eventually adopt the racist language 

commonly used to describe Muslims and Muslim societies.

 

Terms like “Mullahs,” “Ayatollahs,” and “Islamists” – the latter, 

as I have argued elsewhere, being popularized by Zionist 

ideologues and curated by none other than Benjamin 

Netanyahu – come to be accepted.... as 

natural descriptors.

 

“Islamic fundamentalism”

 

Another key term in left-wing Islamophobia is “fundamentalism.”

 In the UK, a certain current of feminists formed a group called 

Women Against Fundamentalism, in the late 1980s.

 

They did not adopt a nuanced or narrow definition of 

“fundamentalism” limited to a small subset within 

religious movements. Rather, they explicitly 

stated (1994, p. 7) that they were referring

 to movements that “use religion as a 

basis” for political strategies.

 

This description - covers nearly all Muslim political movements, 

with the exception of a handful of Westernized secular groups

—almost all of which are funded by state-related interests.

 

By their definition, Christian liberation theology and even

the Quakers, a well-known liberal Christian group, 

would also qualify.

 

It is remarkable --- that this Islamophobic term was deemed

 appropriate for an organization claiming to be progressive, 

but there it is. One of the key activists, was Julia Bard, a 

member of the Jewish Socialists’ Group, raising several 

questions about that organization.

 

Others involved included Nira Yuval-Davis, who describes 

herself as “an anti-Zionist diasporic Israeli Jew,” a 

phrase that appears to legitimize the false Zionist 

notion that Jews outside Israel, constitute a 

diaspora and lends political legitimacy to

 the concept of “Israel.”

 

Perhaps the best-known figurehead of Women Against 

Fundamentalism was Gita Sahgal, infamous for 

labeling the civil rights group Cage as “Jihadi,” 

a subject I have explored in depth elsewhere. 

The term “Jihadi” is another Islamophobic 

label ....used to demonize Muslims 

engaged in political life.

 

Maryam Namazie and the secular/feminist/

communist  alliance ------ with Mossad

 

Gita Sahgal has also been closely associated with the Council 

of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB). For example, she appeared 

for “evening drinks” at a 2013 meeting alongside Maryam 

Namazie, the spokesperson for CEMB.

 

Founded in 2007, CEMB is an anti-Muslim organization. 

Namazie, who is Iranian, was prominent in the early 

October 2022 demonstrations against the Islamic 

Republic in Trafalgar Square on behalf of CEMB.

 

Images of her topless protest were subsequently

 removed by Instagram and Twitter.

 

That day, she joined forces with Islamophobic monarchists and 

other anti-government factions. Namazie is a former leading 

member of the Worker-Communist Party of Iran, though as

 of 2017 she still identified as a “communist.”

 

This has not prevented her from collaborating with far-right 

groups through her “anti-Shariah” campaign organization, 

One Law for All. Among its supporters from Islamophobic 

networks are prominent neoconservatives like Ayaan 

Hirsi Ali and Caroline Fourest, as well as Zionists 

such as Alan Johnson, who works for the 

Israeli lobby group BICOM.

 

Additionally, various UK anti-Muslim civil society groups, 

including the Lawyers’ Secular Society, the National 

Secular Society, Women Against Fundamentalism 

(mentioned earlier), and British Muslims for 

Secular Democracy, have been involved.

 

One Law for All - has also worked closely with far-right figure 

Baroness Cox, who is known for inviting Dutch Islamophobe 

Geert Wilders to the UK.

 

On January 16 of this year, Namazie published a piece on

 the website of the Islamophobic UK NGO, the National 

Secular Society, titled Iran: The Generation That 

Broke Faith with Theocracy.

 

The article echoed many of the main falsehoods circulated 

by Mossad and CIA-linked actors, including blaming deaths 

caused by foreign-backed terrorists on the police and 

Basij, claiming that families must pay for the bullets 

that killed their loved ones, in order to reclaim 

their bodies, and more.

 

Left opposition and ‘workerism’

 

There is also a tendency ---- to seize upon any criticism 

of governments in Western-designated enemy states. 

Liberal opposition suffices, but it’s often preferable

 if it can be framed as left-wing or ‘progressive’ 

criticism or revolt. Thus, Owen Jones has 

made himself appear misguided.... by 

citing Tudeh, the marginal, counter

-revolutionary, and Islamophobic 

Iranian “Communist” party.

 

The naive “workerism” prevalent among large sections of the 

left is also noteworthy. Consequently, many leftists have 

circulated statements from unions in Tehran and 

elsewhere, attempting to leverage these as 

proof of genuine grassroots dissent,

thereby obscuring the cover they 

provide to acts of terror.

 

One of the more sophisticated examples of this approach 

appeared in a piece published by Progressive 

International, the think tank funded in part 

by proceeds from the Sanders Institute, 

established by Bernie Sanders.

 

While the article offered an otherwise nuanced analysis of the 

forces arrayed against the Islamic Republic, it slipped into 

imagining that workers’ struggles in Iran might be free 

from foreign intervention. However, as British writer 

Phil Bevin demonstrates, the backing of such 

actions by the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MKO) 

terror cult --- seriously undermines 

these arguments.

 

It comes as no surprise that Progressive International, with its 

star-studded roster of intellectuals including Noam Chomsky, 

Jeremy Corbyn, and Yanis Varoufakis --- is also a strong 

supporter of the recently collapsed CIA operation in

 northeast Syria, commonly known as Rojava.

 

Those involved in running Rojava.. are closely linked to the 

Sanders-Corbyn political current. Its director, David Adler, 

came from the Sanders Institute, and communications 

director James Schneider, is the highly controversial 

former spin doctor for Corbyn. Their involvement 

inthe “Justice for Kurds” campaign aligns 

seamlessly with their effective cover 

for CIA and Mossad-backed terror 

in Iran.

 

Anti-zionists against Islam

 

Here are some words from a self-proclaimed anti-Zionist

 and supporter of Palestinian liberation, spoken within 

the last fortnight.

 

To be clear, this is not someone who is a “watermelon” 

supporter of Palestinian “rights,” but a genuine 

supporter of the resistance and the liberation 

of Palestine, at least according to their 

public statements.

 

“Yes, Israel and the USA were involved in attacking the regime 

during the protests, but to miss the hatred of the Iranian 

people for the repressive, corrupt, theocratic rule of 

the Mullahs is racist and orientalist. The clerical 

regime of Iran is bated in the blood of their 

own people.”

 

“The clerical regime in Iran bears resemblance to fascism.”

 

“I happen to believe that when religion takes over 

the state, it inevitably means it is repressive.”

 

It is truly breathtaking to hear these racist beliefs spill from the 

mouths of self-proclaimed anti-racists and anti-Zionists. Every 

term from the Islamophobic bingo card is there: “regime,” 

“theocratic,” “mullahs,” “repressive,” and, of 

course, “fascism.”

 

This example is just one of many that reveal how deeply 

Islamophobic ideas run on the left — including within 

anti-Zionist circles, Jewish anti-Zionist 

groups included.

 

Revolutionary socialists for Mossad terror

 

Here is a ‘revolutionary socialist’ posting on Facebook, a 

post that received 172 likes from prominent British and 

international leftists, including many members of 

Trotskyist groups such as Counterfire and the 

Socialist Workers Party.

 

The author, John Clarke, a Canadian academic and socialist 

activist, opened his brief piece by stating that “the struggle 

in Iran should be supported but, at the same time, we must 

speak out against US and Israeli interference 

and intervention.”

 

There seems to be no recognition... that this amounts to 

simultaneously supporting Mossad and condemning it. 

 

Clarke goes on to acknowledge that “there is no

doubt that Western and Israeli intelligence 

agencies are seeking to influence the 

movement in Iran.

 

Doubtless, there are also reactionary and monarchist 

elements on the ground who are doing all they can 

to ensure the struggle serves US interests.”

 

In reality, the original demonstrations beginning December 28th 

were protests over economic grievances, not protests against 

the Islamic Republic itself. The left appears oblivious to the 

internal political dynamics at play. When Pahlavists and 

Mossad agents showed up, they were roundly 

condemned by the demonstrators.

 

Following the two nights of rioting and terror -- instigated by 

Mossad and its recruits, million-strong marches took place 

in Tehran and other cities across the country. Virtually no 

Western leftist - has acknowledged this massive display 

of national unity.

 

Most strikingly, Clarke quotes Lenin on the 1916 Easter Rising 

in Ireland, writing that Lenin “took on those who focused on 

the imperfect form of the struggle and stressed the way 

forward that it pointed to.” While true, it is utterly 

fanciful to compare an anti-colonial uprising in 

Ireland --- to a Mossad-orchestrated terror 

attack in Iran.

 

The latter signals the potential end of the Islamic Republic, the 

balkanization of Iran, and its elimination as a threat to the so-

called “Greater Israel” project and the leading global 

supporter of Palestinian resistance.

 

Clarke claims socialists - should offer “winning strategies,” but 

Mossad and CIA subversion of the Islamic Republic is a losing 

strategy, both for the prospects of socialist revolution and for 

human civilization.

 

It is also - a surefire way to guarantee full Zionist triumph in 

Palestine, expansion into Greater Israel, and even further, 

towards a new Jewish empire.

 

The New Left for “nuanced” analysis

 

Then there is the tendency to produce “sophisticated” and 

“nuanced” academic-style writing that deliberately says 

very little. Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi, an Iranian 

lecturer at the University of St Andrews, writes

 on the New Left Review blog:

 

“Some cast the unrest as an imminent revolutionary rupture; 

others as exclusively the product of foreign destabilization; 

still others as the delayed reckoning of a society finally 

pushed beyond endurance. Each captures part of the 

picture, but none adequately explains the dynamics 

of the present conjuncture. What is unfolding is 

better understood as the convergence of 

accumulated social exhaustion, acute 

distributive shock - and a crisis of 

governance... which the Islamic 

Republic no longer possesses 

the ideological, bureaucratic 

or fiscal resources 

to manage.”

 

So far, so apparently nuanced. But there is a red flag in that 

phrase “present conjuncture,” which signals that this 

account ultimately carries water for Mossad-

backed terror.

 

This term -------- is a staple of poststructuralist and postmodern

 academic work, which often tries to maintain the appearance

 of a radical, even Marxist, spirit. It originates.. from Italian 

Marxist Antonio Gramsci’s work, later adopted by French 

structuralist Marxist Louis Althusser, whose “glacial 

grip,” as Terry Eagleton put it, was passed on to 

British cultural studies scholar Stuart Hall 

and his followers.

 

The problem is, that by the time Hall domesticated the concept 

in the 1980s, it had been stripped of any recognisable Marxist 

or anti-imperialist politics. Now, forty years later, the term is 

confined to academic debates and has no practical use 

whatsoever for actual movements seeking to defeat

 imperial power.

 

And so it is that only a few paragraphs later, we find this:

 

At the same time, there is video evidence of armed protesters 

confronting security forces with knives, machetes, and, in 

some cases, firearms, supposedly indicating how years 

of repression have radicalized segments of 

the opposition.

 

The evidence for this claim is, of course, nonexistent. These 

weapons did not arise from the radicalization of Iranian 

citizens but were supplied by foreign 

intelligence agencies.

 

Moreover, this narrative completely ignores the open boasting 

by Mossad and even Mike Pompeo’s January 2nd post on X, 

claiming Mossad agents were on the ground. Did Sadeghi-

Boroujerdi overlook this crucial information in his 

research? In fact, the word “Mossad” does not

 appear once in his piece.

 

The most glaring failure of analysis is the suggestion that 

Mossad’s involvement only strengthened the Islamic 

Republic’s arguments.

 

“Acknowledging foreign interference does not mean endorsing 

the claim that the nationwide protests were purely foreign-

engineered. A widespread uprising... rooted in years of 

social and economic hardship, cannot be reduced to 

external intelligence machinations—even if Israeli 

and US agencies - sought to hijack it. What they 

chiefly achieved, was to provide a convenient 

alibi for repression, reframing the protests 

as a continuation of the June war, 

thereby... justifying a state of 

exception under the guise 

of national security.”

 

This is a truly awful way to describe an assault on the very 

foundations of the Islamic Revolution. Unsurprisingly, 

Sadeghi-Boroujerdi resorts to the racist label 

“Islamist” in his analysis of the Republic.

 

He closes his post by lamenting a “rapidly narrowing space for 

political agency.” Yet in this context, the idea of “agency” 

reeks of one of the key CIA talking points routinely 

deployed in regime change operations, an 

agenda tied closely to a specific 

intelligence agency.

 

In the end, there is no way around it: the international left is, 

at best, providing cover for and advancing Zionist efforts to 

destroy the Islamic Republic – and with it, the material 

defense of the Palestinians.

 

At worst, they are direct collaborators in the Zionist assault on 

Iran and -- by clear extension -- in the genocide in the Levant. 

And if they are Iranian, they are traitors to their own people.

 

David Miller is the producer and co-host of Press TV’s weekly 

Palestine Declassified show.  He was sacked from Bristol 

University in October 2021 over his Palestine advocacy. 

 

(The views expressed in this article do 

not necessarily reflect those of Press TV)

Image: National Girl Child Day 2026 in India

Image: No thanks to Israeli goods App

Image: Russian scientists and Scottish ones

Image: BRICS

Image: March 26 London anti cuts demo

Image: China's rapeseed blossoms this Spring.

Image: retirement China style

Image: unemployment in Wales

Other pages:

Rhondda Records Home Page

Peace Page
A Page from the Rhondda dedicated to Peace
One Union
A Page to help unity among working people
The Miners' Next Step and Donbass news
A pamphlet,a song and a future for loving people everywhere
Rhondda Records Cartoon Page
A page to help the Rhondda laugh
Quotations Page
Words said in truth or jest
Your Health Page
A page to help your health - be positive !
Africa Page
Africa - news, progress, events
genuine leftwing Mass events Page
Some activities you just might like to aid Peace
Discussion Page
Let's open up and share (communicate)
Poisoning Earth and our terrible fate, if, if, if
Human degradation ruins our beautiful planet
Siarad Gwmraeg? A page for Welsh patriots
Wales News and our Welsh language News
Poetry and Literature in Wales & the World, Page
Poetry and Literature in Wales
Rhondda Records' Top Recommended Books Page
Great Thinkers point the way forward
FOLK REVOLUTION
A Page for those who DO care about true folk
Richard Gould's Page
Move over Titch Gwilym and Micky Gee, Richard Gould IS the new Welsh virtuoso
Efran Kaye's Page
The master of music, Efran Kaye is here!
Glynbyerful Male (voice) Choir's Very Own Page
a choir from all the Glyns of the Rhondda for nutters
Rhondda History Page
A page to help those who want to know the Rhonddas past
Penrhys, Rhondda Page
A page telling the story of a unique magical village - Penrhys, in the Rhondda !
Poet's Page
music and opinion from Wales' wandering poet.
The Novel --- as promised
The Boy Who Lived Up A Tree

This is the text-only version of this page. Click here to see this page with graphics.
Edit this page | Manage website
Make Your Own Website: 2-Minute-Website.com