# CONFIRMED ---- The IDF ploy to capture
the Chief of Internal Security Service in
Gaza has failed, and the Katz' claim of
taking the "senior Hamas leader"
is outright false
September 1, 3:40pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
The IDF ploy to capture the Chief of Internal Security Service
in Gaza has failed, and Katz' claim of capturing the "senior
Hamas member" is outright false.
However.... the cabal did succeed in capturing an officer
in Internal security Mu‘in Al‘Arabid, after he fell injured
while participating in the clashes.... to compensate.
Source: Telegram "GeoPWatch",
repost "conflictarchive"
_______________________________________
No going back: Iran’s strategic control
of Strait of Hormuz signals new
regional order - and end of
US naval hegemony
September 1, 1:15pm
by Press TV Strategic Analysis Desk
The strategic waters of the Strait of Hormuz, through which
approximately 20 percent of the world's oil passed before
the recent war, stand at the epicentre of a fundamental
power shift that has permanently altered the
geopolitical landscape of the region.
For the Islamic Republic of Iran, the return to the pre-war status quo
is out of the question. The country has signaled with unmistakable
clarity - that the old arrangements, under which all vessels would
pass through the waterway while Iran simultaneously dealt with
economic strangulation and military threats, are consigned to
the annals of history.
What has emerged now is a new strategic reality defined by Iranian
leverage, regional realignment, and the permanent erosion of US
naval dominance in the Persian Gulf.
Even as the US military aggression and maritime banditry continues,
Iran has made it emphatically clear that the strategic waterway will
not reopen until all its demands are met. And, even if the waterway
is reopened, Iran will maintain its full control over it.
The new strategic reality
More than six months after the United States and its Zionist proxy
launched what US war planners initially forecast would be a
week-long “regime change” campaign, there is no clear
off-ramp in sight for the aggressors ..after they ran
out of all their cards.
The goals that Washington set at the outset, have shifted
dramatically and uncomfortably. Reopening the Strait of
Hormuz ---- which was not among Trump's original
objectives, has now become a prime US priority.
This inversion of strategic priorities speaks
volumes about the miscalculation that has
unfolded and the extent to which Iran has
successfully transformed the strait from
a vulnerable chokepoint into an
impregnable instrument of
national power.
The Iranian military has made clear ---- that the strait is under its
“complete and unchallenged” control, with no enemy warships
allowed near the Iranian waters. All hostile naval vessels are
hundreds of kilometres from the strait. This is a remarkable
testament to Iran's ability to project power, deny access
to the enemy, and impose costs on those who once
sailed through these waters ------ with freedom
and impunity.
From a military and regional perspective, no vessel can cross this
waterway without Iran's permission and active management.
This transformation did not happen overnight. It is the
product of decades of investment in asymmetric
naval capabilities, including an extensive fleet
of fast attack craft, coastal defense systems,
naval mines, and anti-ship missiles.
Iran has also invested substantially in underwater warfare
capabilities and unmanned systems that can saturate
defensive networks and overwhelm superior naval
forces. The Islamic Republic has effectively
created a layered defense architecture
that makes any naval operation in the
strait --- extraordinarily risky for an
adversary, regardless --- of its
technological superiority.
The Iran-Oman framework
The arrangement between Tehran and Muscat, details of which are
still under discussion, represents a fundamental re-ordering of the
rules governing the world's most strategic oil chokepoint. It also
marks an end to US naval hegemony in the region.
Under the temporary corridor agreement.. vessels entering the
Persian Gulf will use a northern route passing entirely through
Iranian territorial waters, while outbound traffic will traverse
a southern route through Omani waters. The corridor will
function like a controlled highway with a total width of
approximately seven miles. This is not a return to
free navigation, but a managed transit system
subject to Iranian oversight and approval.
The Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister, Kazem Gharibabadi -- recently
emphasized with characteristic clarity that this arrangement does
not mean the reopening of the strait in a conventional sense. The
waterway --- remains effectively closed, with no military vessels
permitted to pass under any circumstances. Only commercial
ships will be allowed to transit, and even that privilege.... is
contingent upon US compliance with Iranian conditions.
The negotiations with Oman.... have taken place through a joint
working group that included the foreign ministry, the ports and
maritime organization, and the armed forces. This broad
institutional participation underscores the national
consensus behind Iran's new approach to
managing the strategic waterway.
The US miscalculation
Washington's approach to the strait, has been marked by strategic
confusion and shifting rhetoric that betrays a fundamental lack of
coherent policy. Trump --- has claimed the waterway is open, and
functioning, telling conservative commentators that the strait is
operational despite occasional incidents. This characterization
sits awkwardly alongside the reality of a waterway that has
been largely closed for six months, driving up fuel and
fertilizer prices and creating sustained economic
pressure in the US and its allied countries.
The June 2026 memorandum of understanding between the US &
Iran was designed as a pathway to end US military aggression
and maritime banditry and piracy ---- and restore normalcy.
Under that agreement, Iran would have allowed ships to
transit the strait for 60 days. The ceasefire prompted
a surge in crude shipments, with Iran exporting
over 40 million barrels of oil ...in the 2 weeks
after the lifting of the US naval blockade.
Yet the 60-day negotiating period expired without any agreement,
primarily due to constant US breaches of the MoU. Trump even
warned Oman ---- against interfering in US negotiations with
Tehran, threatening military action against the sultanate.
Such threats against a so-called “ally” - reveal the depths of US
frustration but also underscore the limits of US leverage in the
region after the 40-day war. Oman has not backed down, and
the corridor arrangement continues to function, according
to Iranian specifications.
Iran's conditions: No return to the old order
Iran's position is clear, uncompromising, and grounded in both legal
argument and strategic necessity. The strait --- will never return to
its pre-war arrangements, a position that Iranian foreign ministry
officials have described as definitive state policy.
The Iranian proposal to Oman demands that one shipping lane
through the strait must be entirely under Iranian control, with
part of the other lane also subject to Iranian authority. It
represents a projection of power that will give Tehran
effective veto authority over all maritime traffic
through the critical chokepoint.
The legal framework underpinning this position is drawn from Article
5 of the US-Iran memorandum, which clearly states... that Iran is
responsible for determining navigation arrangements, mine-
clearing operations, and security measures. The US, as
Gharibabadi stated, violated the memorandum by
opening an alternative southern shipping route
with Omani cooperation, a path Tehran will
not recognize ---- even for one hour.
Iran has also made clear that any sustainable agreement must
recognize its core interests. No stable arrangement can be
implemented while an illegal blockade continues or
while there are aggressive attempts to prevent
Iranian exports.
The end of the US naval siege must be a practical precondition for
a full return to normal shipping conditions. This, is a reflection of
Iran's experience over the past decade. Iran has vowed never to
return to that state of vulnerability --- and the strait negotiations
are a direct expression of that unwavering will & determination.
The economic dimension
The economic stakes of this reordering can not be overstated. Iran's
ability to export oil freely, with more than 40 million barrels shipped
within two weeks after the blockade was lifted, fundamentally
altered its economic position and restored a degree of
fiscal stability - that had been absent for years.
The restoration of maritime commerce - sent oil prices sharply lower,
with Brent crude trading near 73 dollars a barrel, down ..almost 40%
from the war's peak of 118 dollars in April. That, however, changed
again after the US reimposed the blockade in a desperate move &
---- Iran also closed the Strait of Hormuz to all unregulated traffic.
Iran is not simply seeking a return to pre-war trade patterns. As
Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher
Ghalibaf stated, the sovereignty of the Strait of Hormuz
lies with Iran and Oman, and traffic in the strait is
subject to arrangements determined by Iran.
Iran will not give up its rights in the Strait
of Hormuz - under any circumstances.
This --- is a statement of national policy that has been
institutionalized through the negotiating framework
and the operational arrangements now in place.
The economic implications extend far beyond Iran's oil revenues.
The Strait of Hormuz handles approximately 30% of the world's
seaborne oil trade & a significant portion of liquefied natural
gas shipments. Any disruption to this flow -- has cascading
effects on global energy markets, industrial production,
and consumer prices -- worldwide.
It is the Trump administration that has, through its hard-nosed
policies and military adventurism, wreaked havoc on the
world economy and energy security.
The regional implications
The emerging Iran-Oman alliance in managing the strait represents
a broader realignment of regional power that will shape West
Asian politics for decades to come.
For decades, the United States built its Persian Gulf presence
around the assumption of freedom of navigation, the belief
that its navy could come and go as it pleased, that its
bases were inviolable, and that its regional
hegemony was uncontested.
That assumption is now ---- definitively dead. Iran has become
a regional superpower --- that is capable of imposing costs,
controlling access, & reshaping the rules of engagement
at the regional and global level. Iranian management
and sovereignty over the strategic waterway have
fundamentally altered the balance of power
and leverage in the region.
The implications for Iran's neighbours - are equally profound. The
Persian Gulf Cooperation Council states, have long relied on US
“security guarantees” to protect their maritime trade & energy
exports. The new reality forces them to recalibrate their
relationships. The corridor arrangement may serve as
a template for future regional security architectures
that reduce US influence .....while increasing
Iranian responsibility.
The future of the Strait of Hormuz will be determined through
continued negotiations between Iran and Oman. The goal is
to establish a permanent corridor and determine how the
strait will be administered in the long term without any
foreign interference.
The United States and its allies face a strategic choice. They
can accept a new regional architecture in which Iran
exercises effective sovereignty over the strait, or
they can continue a struggle that has already
proven far more costly and protracted
than they had anticipated.
What they cannot do, however, is restore the pre-war status quo.
That chapter has closed, and the rules of the game have been
rewritten ------ by Iranian resolve, strategic patience, and the
demonstrated ability to impose costs on adversaries.
_______________________________________________________
US’ ‘unsinkable aircraft carrier’
just got wiped out by Iran
September 1, 12:16pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
At its height, Naval Support Activity Bahrain (NSA Bahrain) housed
~8.5k troops, supported 30+ forward-deployed warships, and
served as the primary operational hub and HQ of the
US Fifth Fleet.
Wide-area maritime surveillance, regional early warning and point
defense were made possible using an AR-327 long-range
surveillance radar, a powerful AN/TPS-59 missile
defense radar, and an AN/MPQ-65 fire-control
radar. Integrated defenses included
PAC-3 batteries and C-RAMs.
Base C&C systems for C4I included Naval Computer &
Telecommunications Station Bahrain – which tapped
into EHF and AEHF satellite networks for real-time
coordination, and targeting. Paired with the Isa
and Al Udeid air bases --- NSA Bahrain packed
firepower equivalent to that of whole nations.
Then, in the space of a just a few days, from late February-early
March, the facility was pounded so hard by Iran that it was left
a “virtually uninhabitable” hollowed-out husk. Retired US
Navy Captain John Cordle characterizes the base’s fate
as “unimaginable.”
“The installation ...provides the physical infrastructure that keeps
American military power continuously available in a strategically
vital region. It is foundational to America’s ability to project
maritime power in this critical theatre,” Cordle lamented
in a wistful MilitaryTimes op-ed.
Accordingly, “the idea that the US could not prevent and defend
against a predictable attack on a Fleet Headquarters – and our
sailors stationed there – is quite startling.”
Without access to the base, US Navy logistics and resupply have
evacuated to Diego Garcia – some 2.2k+ nautical miles away.
The Fifth Fleet’s HQ has fled to Florida.
“The potential loss of NSA Bahrain is effectively the equivalent of
losing an aircraft carrier,” Cordle complained. “If NSA Bahrain is
not reconstituted to something near its pre-attack capabilities,
it will fundamentally change how the US Navy operates,
supplies and maintains its ships. It will also upend
how we support regional coalition partners in
the Gulf region.”
“Potential” loss? “Reconstituted” to its pre-war status? How cute.
Top Iranian officials have warned ------ that they would not let that
happen. And why would they? If Iran stationed military forces in
Mexico and used them to repeatedly attack the US in the
middle of negotiations, would the US tolerate it?
Source: Telegram "geopolitics_prime"
______________________________________
Resistance detects, thwarts
Israeli special forces op
in Gaza City
August 1, 1130am
Al Mayadeen English
The Israeli occupation claims.... there is a ceasefire in
Gaza, but this is the truth pic.twitter.com/nkCXOI7JvY
— Motasem A Dalloul (@AbujomaaGaza) September 1, 2026
An Israeli special forces unit reportedly infiltrated western Gaza City
before being detected, sparking clashes with the Resistance and
intense airstrikes.
An Israeli special forces unit attempted to infiltrate western Gaza
City on Monday in an operation reportedly targeting a Resistance
commander, but was detected before it could complete its
mission, according to Al Mayadeen's correspondent.
The detection triggered an armed confrontation between the
Palestinian Resistance and the infiltrating occupation unit.
The correspondent reported that several Israeli
occupation troops were eliminated in the
confrontations, forcing the occupation
to intervene using air power.
The confrontation prompted the Israeli occupation to provide aerial
support to the unit, with over 10 warplanes deployed over the area,
which carried out a series of intense and heavy strikes.
Several Palestinians were martyred during the attack, while others
sustained varying injuries, according to our correspondent.
Five martyred in Israeli attacks on Gaza City
At least five Palestinians were martyred in Israeli attacks on Gaza
City since dawn on Monday, Al Mayadeen's correspondent in
Gaza reported, as occupation forces continued their
bombardment of the Strip.
Three of the martyrs were killed when occupation aircraft bombed a
car in Gaza City's Tal al-Hawa neighbourhood. Nearby in Shujaiya,
east of the city, an Israeli drone dropped bombs on the Basatat
market area, the correspondent said.
West of Gaza City, two more people were martyred and several
others wounded when occupation aircraft bombed a group of
civilians near Baladiya Park.
Al Mayadeen's correspondent also reported IOF troops
carrying out excavation work around the Beit Lahia
sports club in the northern Strip.
Source: Al Mayadeen English