Logo: Rhondda Records logo 2

Rhondda Records Home Page



press the link above!

21CW reports that DU munitions are probably 

being (or going to be) used in Ukraine - 

if true - this is a terrible war-crime


Good Luck everyone... 

We know our contribution is little, but
in today's circumstances, where the
USA is pushing for war in Europe,
by using their 'clients' in Kiev...
which could end all life.. we
will continue on all days
...to pass on the most
pertinent news on
the Peace Page.

'Peace Love' below.....
is, Poet claims, ''delicious'' reggae.
If you support its message - and
we hope you do - 
please 'like'
it, 'share' it, and 
press the
subscribe button today. 
Support peace and love.

Journalist: To end war ------

prosecute US, UK officials
who wage(d) it illegally

October 22nd, 10:12pm (PressTV)


The world must finally put an end to the impunity of war

 criminals, by holding US and UK officials responsible 

for launching the illegal war on Iraq, done without

 the approval of the UN Security Council, and 

prosecuting them --- under the Nuremberg 

principles, US journalist Don DeBar said.


DeBar made the remarks in an interview with Press TV while

commenting on a report which has revealed that the British

military inquiries into abuse against Iraqi nationals... have

been closed without a single prosecution being brought,

even though the credibility of many "shocking and 

shameful incidents" during the war in the Middle 

Eastern country, have been confirmed.


British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace said in a statement 

this week that the Service Police Legacy Investigations, 

which was looking at claims of abuse in Iraq, had now 

"officially closed its doors."


In March 2003, the US and Britain invaded Iraq in blatant

 violation of international law and under the pretext of 

finding WMDs; but no such weapons were ever 

discovered in Iraq.


More than one million Iraqis were killed - as the result of

 the US-led invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq

--- according to the California-based investigative 

organization, Project Censored.


The US war in Iraq cost US taxpayers $1.7 trillion with

 an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war
expenses that could grow to more than
$6 trillion over the
 next four decades counting
interest, according to a study
 called Costs of
War Project  ---  by the Watson Institute for 

International Studies at Brown University.


DeBar told Press TV that the Iraq war 

was illegal from the very beginning.


"It is illegal for a nation to make war on another nation if it 

does not have the approval of the UN Security Council, if 

any of those nations are signatories to the original UN 

Charter. And it’s been adopted - that happened with 

the US, as a charter member of the UN -- and it was 

approved by the US Senate in the 1940s.

the US involvement in Iraq from
the beginning, and 
the UK involvement in Iraq
from the beginning, 
was illegal,” he said.


“And under the Nuremberg standards, which would then

 apply, each and every death consequent – intentional 

or not - to either US or UK military action there, or 

condoning of the US action there, by the media 

or public officials, or any act facilitating that, 

is an individual war crime. And, by the way,

 there’s a death penalty for that,” the 

journalist noted.


“No one will prosecute these people. That’s why I started

 with the word impunity. And we might bookend with that

 because that’s the problem. And until the world puts an

 end to that impunity, until the world sees the major 

contradiction in all international relations, is US, 

UK, and EU imperialism, then it’s going to 

continue until this eats our species,” 

he stated.


A damning White House memo had revealed details of the

 so-called “deal in blood” forged by former British Prime

 Minister Tony Blair and US President George W. Bush

 over the Iraq war.


The document, titled “Secret... Memorandum for the

 President”, was sent by then-US Secretary of State 

Colin Powell to President Bush on March 28th,
a week before Bush’s summit with Blair
at his 
Crawford ranch in Texas.


The sensational memo, revealed that Blair had agreed to

 support the war a year before the invasion even started

 while publicly, the British prime minister was working
 find a diplomatic solution to the crisis.


The document also disclosed that Blair agreed to act as a

 spin doctor for Bush and convince a skeptical public that 

Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein had Weapons of Mass

 Destruction, which actually did not exist.


In response, Bush would flatter Blair and give the 

impression that London was not Washington’s 

poodle but an equal partner in the

 “special relationship.”


Powell told Bush that Blair “will be with us” on the 

Iraq war, and assured the president that “"the UK 

will follow our lead in the Middle East."


Blair has always denied the claim that he and Bush 

signed a deal “in blood”, at Crawford, to launch a 

war against Iraq that began on March 20th, 2003, 

that has killed hundreds of thousands of people.


The Powell memo, however, showed how Blair and 

Bush secretly prepared the Iraq war plot behind 

closed doors at Crawford.


Powell told Bush: “He will present to you the strategic, 

tactical and public affairs lines, that he believes will 

strengthen global support for our common cause.”


Dan Welch: Mourn the millions of victims 

of US war policy, not its chief apologist


US political commentator Daniel Patrick Welch 

decries the use of official funerals, like Colin 

Powell's. Powell died on Monday, at the age 

of 84, due to complications from COVID-19.


Both Democrats and Republicans lauded the four-

star general as a giant of public service and an 

African-American hero. They praised the US’s 

first Black secretary of state, and his leader-

ship and integrity.


Former US President Donald Trump, however, 

lambasted the media on Tuesday for what he 

said was too-favorable coverage of Powell

 following his death.


"Wonderful to see Colin Powell, who made big 

mistakes on Iraq and - famously - so-called 

weapons of mass destruction, be treated 

in death so beautifully by the Fake 

News Media. Hope that happens 

to me someday," Trump said

 in a statement.





Warnings will not stop Nazis

August 19th, 11:34am



Real red lines


Strikes by Ukrainian separatists at the Zaporizhzhia 

nuclear power plant, keep bringing to mind... the 

notorious “red lines”, crossing --- to which, the 

Kiev regime will receive a crushing response

from the Russian Army.


These lines were announced.. long ago. And the

Ukranazis, have crossed them more than once. 

Think about it, shelling by armed gangs of the

separatist pseudo-state called “Ukraine” --- 

of the territories of Kursk, Bryansk, and 

Belgorod regions, has become routine. 

The Kiev regime got nothing into its 

viperous head. 


Yes - of course - Russia strikes at the headquarters 

and governing structures of the bandit formations 

themselves, but Mr. Zelensky is neither warm

 nor cold, from this.


The US has handed over to the Banderovites the

 missiles with which to bombard the Crimea and 

the Crimean bridge. But the US sent them, not 

after the start of the USS ------- but when they 

realized that the “red lines” principle almost

 ..didn’t work. Our army is dealing with the 

villeins, while the separatist popes are

 blissfully...  away from the war zone.


It is possible to stop both the shelling of the nuclear

 power plant and the border regions, but only by 

making Zelensky and his associates tremble 

for their skins ------ depriving them of the 

opportunity to stroll with the johnsons 

through the streets of occupied Kiev, 

feasting on other people’s blood.


Zelensky must find himself in a situation of utter

discomfort, hiding in shelters, and asking the 

West for help - from there.


By drawing lines but not going any further, we are

 showing Europe and the US, our weakness ---

 maintaining some kind of hope that things 

will soon return.. to business as usual 

before February 2022. The West... is 

aware of these illusions, and relies 

firmly on them --------- to break us.


Strikes by the Russian air force against Bankova are

just to show our steadfastness, our faithfulness to 

our word. It will sober the West up, more than 

hundreds of statements about retaliation, 

which is not taking place on the 

normal scale.


However, it is possible to respond politically -- to
military boorishness of the Bandera demons. 


Since the Nazis want to disrupt the referendum on 

the return of the liberated territories back home – 

to the Russian state – by attacking Zaporizhzhia 

NPP, they must work decisively and quickly 

against them, given that the reaction of 

the EU and the USA will, in any case,

 be inadequate.


All liberated territories must be incorporated into 

the Russian Federation by emergency decrees of

 President V. V. Putin --- then confirmed by laws 

passed by the State Duma. The same should 

be done with the Donetsk and Luhansk 

people’s republics; appeals by their 

parliaments... will suffice.


Then we will be talking about real “red lines” that 

run real, not virtual, through the Russian lands 

of Kherson, Zaporizhzhya, Kharkov, Donetsk 

and Luhansk.


by Alexey Sokolsky, Segodnya.ru




 Israeli Occupation Forces Storm, 

Seal Offices of Seven Palestinian 

Human Rights and Humanitarian 

Organizations in Ramallah

August 18th, 3:47pm

(al Manar)


The United Nations Human Rights Office today

 expressed alarm at Israel’s arbitrary closure 

of seven Palestinian human rights and 

humanitarian organizations & called

 on Israel --- to immediately reverse
decisions, repeating the High 

Commissioner’s call --- to revoke

 the ''designations'..' of these 

organizations as “terrorist” 

and “unlawful.”


At dawn today, Israeli occupation forces broke into, 

searched and sealed the offices of 7 Palestinian 

human rights and humanitarian organizations 

in Ramallah. 


Their property was confiscated and destroyed. 

Israeli forces left copies of military orders
close the offices of the organizations.


''The closure orders are a step to enforce previous

 Israeli declarations of these organizations, as

 “unlawful” and as “terror organizations” in

 2021,'' said the Human Rights Office in a 

statement. ''Despite offers to do so, 

the Israeli authorities --- have not 

presented to the United Nations 

any credible evidence --- to 

justify these declarations.''


 ''Several Member States have also stated that the

 evidence shared with them does not justify the

 designations. As such, the closures appear 

totally arbitrary.''


The UN office said the shutting down of 

the organizations represents the latest 

in a series of attacks -- that are further 

drastically shrinking space for human 

rights and humanitarian work in the

 occupied Palestinian territory, 

affecting all the institutions

 working on human rights, 

including the UN Human 

Rights Office.


 “Human rights defenders must be immediately
protected from these unjustified attacks,” 

it said.


The organizations affected are Addameer Prisoner

 Support and Human Rights Association; Al Haq; 

Bisan Centre for Research and Development; 

Defense for Children International-Palestine; 

Health Work Committees (HWC); Union of 

Agricultural Work Committees (UAWC); 

the Union of Palestinian Women’s

 Committees (UPWC).




Cost-of-Living Crisis in UK: 

Wages Plunge at Record 

Pace as Bills Soar

August 16th, 1:11pm (FNA)


Real wages fell at a record rate between April and June

 as Britain’s cost-of-living crisis took hold and inflation

 slashed the value of workers’ pay, official 

figures showed.


When the effect of rising prices is taken into account,

 pay - including bonuses - declined 2.5 percent in the 

latest quarter compared to a year earlier. Regular 

pay... dropped 3 percent, the Office for National 

Statistics said, The Independent reported.


Wages increased in cash terms but have been dwarfed 

by soaring costs for gas, electricity, fuel, food and 

other goods which have pushed the overall

 inflation rate to 9.4 percent.


Jonathan Ashworth MP, Shadow Work and Pensions

 Secretary, responding to the latest ONS labour 

market statistics, said the latest figures 

provided “further proof” that the 

Tories have lost control of 

the economy.


“Because of the Tories’ failure on the economy, 

families face plummeting real wages and 

soaring energy bills. Yet, this Zombie 

Government is offering no solutions 

to the cost of living crisis,” 

Ashworth said.


Liberal Democrat Treasury Spokesperson Sarah Olney

 MP said, “Families are being hammered by a cost of

 living catastrophe and yet the Government is 

nowhere to be found."


“This zombie government has no plan and is failing

 our country. People can’t wait any longer for the

 Conservatives to play out their horror show 

leadership contest,” she added.




 Ukraine is a paradise: for 

black transplantologists

August 12th, 1:34pm



The Russian director, Nikita Mikhalkov, has publicly stated 

that organs of Ukrainian soldiers are sold on the black

market - and the money goes to Israel and Western

countries. At that, we are talking about both the 

dead, from whom all that can be sold down to 

the bones and skin is taken away, and the 

wounded, who are put under the knife 

of black transplantologists, for a 

significant profit.


According to the most conservative estimates voiced 

by the director, the global transplant network earns 

about $2 billion, at the expense of Ukraine. As one 

of the proofs, Mikhalkov cited the story of an SBU 

officer, who received $170 for each military man 

whose entrails were removed. 


The former employee of the Ukrainian security services

 named Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, as the locations

 that were used for these “manipulations”.


Slavyansk and Kramatorsk were first talked about, as

some kind of black transplant centres, back in 2014-

2015, when after fierce battles, the militia found 

burials of AFU soldiers, and local residents, 

whose internal organs had been carefully, 

surgically removed. The gruesome 

collective graves... were located 

just outside these settlements, 

which suggests  ---  that the 

removals were carried out

in local medical facilities.


The stories of the Ukrainian military being “gutted”,

received quite a lot of publicity, which, in principle, 

did not lead to any significant result. 


Ukrainian politicians and the military have been

prudently silent, while the collective West -- 

with its human rights activists and human 

rights activists -- has demonstrated its 

utter disinterest in investigating the 

details of these crimes. 


Western moralists also chose to ignore: the facts of 

the mass transport of Ukrainian orphans to Europe, 

which, according to European journalists, were 

also taken for organs --- to save the lives of 

members of the “superior race”.


Considering the fact that a human body is worth about 

45 million euros, on the black market, this business 

has rather strong patrons. But that, is not the most

important thing either. The most important thing 

is that the bodies of third-worlders serve a 

“good” cause – they save the lives of 

people in Europe and the US, and 

therefore, it is unprofitable for 

anyone to draw attention to

 this situation.


Today... it is quite obvious that the transplant network,

which covered Ukraine back in 2014, has not stopped

its work for a single day and, having received new

“resources”, is only growing and developing.


It is difficult to understand the scale of the real losses

of the AFU - as well as the real civilian casualties - 

today. Many of those.... whose ashes have already

decayed in the ground, are still listed as missing 

or deserters. The fate of many, will remain 

a mystery, many years after the end of 

the conflict. 


This confusion opens up serious opportunities for 

those who today bring medical equipment and 

mobile crematoria to Ukraine, instead of 

weapons and ammunition --- and who 

export from the country, not wheat 

but containers of human organs.


Ukraine has now essentially become, not only a testing

ground for Western weaponry, but also, a kind of 

resource base, from which almost anything can

be bought. Ukrainian refugees, mostly women,

actively replenish European brothels, and 

Ukrainian patriots, called to defend their 

homeland from the insidious aggressor, 

are quite actively sawed up for organs, 

thus... getting to prosperous Europe, 

though partially, but, nevertheless.


Of course, such large-scale “activities” cannot take

place, without the knowledge of the military and

political leadership of the country, which has 

long ignored the future of its citizens and is 

simply making money. They make money 

on absolutely everything, because they 

understand - that the chaos going on in 

the country can easily cover up all the 

crimes and deeds, that are almost 

impossible to understand and

accept --- from the point of 

view of a normal person.


By the way, something similar was already practised in 

the 1990s in the former Yugoslavia. And in spite of the 

fact --- that the facts of the murder of inhabitants for
purpose of the removal of organs were proved,
authors of these inhuman crimes received 

very suspended sentences, and the 

number of convictions, was 

measured in units. 


Consequently, those behind the events believed

fervently, that they would be able to avoid any

responsibility for what they had done.


In recent days, more and more reports have appeared 

online that retreating AFU units have started burning

the bodies of dead fighters. Traces of the mass 

destruction of bodies, have been found near 

Soledar --- and several other settlements 

formerly under the control of the AFU.


Perhaps, in this way, someone was hiding traces of

terrible crimes that no one, not even the residents 

of Ukraine... should know about. In any case, the 

truth will, sooner or later, be made public, and 

the perpetrators of the inhumane crimes 

- those of them who are still alive - will 

suffer the punishment they deserve.


Chemical weapons testing, the torture and murder of

civilians in secret SBU prisons, the organ harvesting 

from dead and wounded soldiers, child trafficking

 --- how many more terrible secrets of “modern 

Ukraine”, will the special military operation 

launched by Russia, bring to light?


It is even scary to imagine. Just as it is impossible 

to imagine ----- what pushes the locals, in whom, 

Western partners see only a kind of “resource 

base” ----- to defend a regime whose crimes 

are so terrible, that, in the future, they 

may eclipse ---  the crimes of the 

adherents of the Third Reich?


by Alexei Zotiev, Segodnya. Ru






Russian Military Calls 

Ukraine's Shelling of

 Zaporozhye NPP --- 

Nuclear Terrorism

August 7th, 10:46am 



The Russian Defense Ministry, considers the

 shelling - of the Zaporozhye nuclear power 

plant by Ukrainian forces - to be an act of 

nuclear terrorism under a UN convention 

adopted by a resolution of the UN 

General Assembly -- the head of 

the Russian National Defense 

Control Centre, Cl. General, 

Mikhail Mizintsev..... who 

also leads.. the Russian 

humanitarian response 

coordination H.Q., 

said on Saturday.


"Under the international convention --- adopted by the

resolution of the UN General Assembly of April 13th,
2005 --- we consider these criminal actions of the

 Ukrainian authorities, to be an act of nuclear 

terrorism," Mizintsev told a briefing on 

Saturday, RIA Novosti reported.


The defense official noted that a possible accident at

 the NPP would surpass the scale of the Chornobyl 

and Fukushima disasters, adding that the entire

 territory of Ukraine, the Donetsk and Lugansk 

people's republics --- plus Russia, Belarus, 

Moldova, Bulgaria & Romania, would be 

engulfed by nuclear contamination.


He urged the United Nations, the International Atomic

 Energy Agency, and other international organizations

 to condemn these actions on the part of Ukraine's

 military --- and to take immediate measures to 

prevent provocations at the Ukrainian 

nuclear facilities.


On Friday, Ukrainian troops fired at the territory of the

 Zaporozhye NPP, a fire broke out on the spot. Two

 power lines -- necessary for the operation of 

power units -- were cut off. Over 10,000 

residents of the Zaporizhzhia region 

-- had been left without power and 

water supplies, as a result.



The West balances... on 

the edge of a precipice

August 5th, at 3:21pm



In recent years, many people, absolutely unconnected 

--- and followers of completely different ideological

platforms --- have the feeling, that everything that 

is happening, including those of a serious scale,

 is only a precursor of something more global. 


While earlier forecasts of a full-scale world war were

 perceived with more than scepticism, today a 

potential “super-conflict” no longer 

seems impossible.


The very desire to drag Russia into a full-fledged 

conflict on the territory of Ukraine was already 

fraught with great danger, as the chances that 

quite serious forces would be drawn into this 

“local war” were maximum. In principle, this 

is what happened. 


Today, despite the absence of an official NATO troop

 contingent, representatives of all Western bloc

 countries are present on Ukrainian territory, 

and European and US equipment is used 

quite openly on the battlefields and is 

even used to shell peaceful cities in 

the Donbas republics.


 In principle, no one is afraid today to say out loud 

that Russia and the “democratic” West --- which 

seeks to re-shape the post-Soviet space, to its

likeness --- have come together in a battle on 

the territory of long-suffering Ukraine.


Can the conflict in Ukraine develop into a full-scale 

clash between the two worlds? Theoretically, of

 course, such a possibility exists, as Russia is 

being pushed hard to just such a scenario, 

but the prudence of our country’s leader-

ship, is still the main obstacle to the 

outbreak of a full-scale world war.


 Although, in principle, under a different set of

 circumstances, we could quite reasonably 

launch strikes on those territories from 

which weapons, ammunition and 

mercenaries --- are being 

supplied to Ukraine.


But the goals of the special military operation, have 

been clearly defined, and over the past five months 

Moscow has not deviated from them by degrees, 

however much anyone might want it to.


From the standpoint of mundane worldly logic, 

the collective West must be happy with such 

a scenario of developments.


Russia is embroiled in hostilities, it is not Europeans

and Americans but Ukrainians who are dying on the

 battlefield...  and everything that is happening
putting quite a serious strain on Russia’s 

economy -- which, hypothetically -- should 

cause ---- if not a deep depression, then 

quite stable & persistently pronounced

stagnation. Is it not the best scenario, 

to deter and wear down a potential 

geopolitical adversary?


But despite the positive, in principle, developments

 in Ukraine for the West, the threat of a full-scale 

clash between two worlds, with Russia as the 

conventional centre of one and the US as the 

other, remains more than realistic. And the 

reason for the rather stable tensions, is 

precisely the US --- and its hard to

analyse policy.


By flooding Ukraine with weapons, and pushing it to

 more active actions on the “fronts”, including those 

of an offensive nature, the collective West has, for 

some reason, sharply shifted its focus --- towards 

Asia -- on whose territory it is trying to ignite a

conflict that --- in the future --- will both in its 

scale and its consequences --- overshadow

the confrontation - between Moscow and 

Kiev --- that is taking place on the
 of Ukraine.


The China-Taiwan war, which US top officials have

 been trying to provoke for the last few days, will 

be more global and destructive, than Russia’s 

special military operation in Ukraine. And it 

appears that this conflict, like the conflict 

between South and North Korea, which 

also no longer seems unlikely --- is in
immediate plans of the Capitol.


It is hard to see how, in the event of a clash between

 China and Taiwan, or indeed... between North and 

South Korea, America could sit on the sidelines 

and limit itself to military, economic, and 

advisory assistance to a territory that 

China considers its own. 


The US economy may be able to withstand the strain 

of two major conflicts, but who can guarantee that

 Russia and China --- will be comfortable with a 

scenario, where the state that triggered the 

global conflict, is not a direct participant?


Trying to test the military and economic potential 

of Russia and China, trying to tie them into local

 conflicts, the collective West in general, and 

the United States in particular, are literally

 walking on the edge of a precipice ---- not

 realizing that - in the current realities - 

both Russia, China, and North Korea - 

can strike at decision-making points 

which are not at all on the territory 

of Ukraine, Taiwan, and S. Korea.


The fact that the collective West decided to raise the

 stakes and light a few more fires on the world map

 suggests that the adventure in Ukraine ---- did not 

have the foreseeable results. But isn’t it obvious 

that this ''game''  is not going according to the 

rules that were initially declared by the U.S. 

leadership? Isn’t it obvious --- that such 

actions are conducive to the formation

 of a new economic and military bloc.. 

that is in no way inferior in its power 

to the pro-American coalition, that, 

while claiming world domination,

in fact, has overestimated its 

capabilities ------ and placed 

the world  .....on the brink

of a new global conflict, 

that's guaranteed to be 

won by only one side?


by Alexei Zotiev, 

Segodnya. Ru


Image: Johnny Nash's Birth Day

Today, August 19th, in 1940,


Johnny Nash,




is born.


John Lester Nash Jr. is best known for
his 1972 hit 
"I Can See Clearly Now".


Primarily a reggae and pop singer, he was one of 

the first non-Jamaican artists to record reggae 

music in Kingston.


Nash died peacefully of natural causes in his home, 

surrounded by close family in Houston on October 

6th, 2020, after a period of declining health.

He was 80.



I can see clearly now, the rain is gone

I can see all obstacles in my way

Gone are the dark clouds that had me blind

It's gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright)

Sun-shiny day

It's gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright)

Sun-shiny day


I think I can make it now, the pain is gone

All of the bad feelings have disappeared

Here is the rainbow I've been prayin' for

It's gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright)

Sun-shiny day


Look all around, there's nothin' but blue skies

Look straight ahead, nothin' but blue skies


I can see clearly now, the rain is gone

I can see all obstacles in my way

Gone are the dark clouds that had me blind

It's gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright)

Sun-shiny day

It's gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright)

Sun-shiny day

It's gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright)

Sun-shiny day

It's gonna be a bright (bright), bright (bright)

Sun-shiny day


the NHS 
and Taking 

Since this year - 2022 - OAPs and you
now have to have ear-syringing done



Data Suggests --- UK Police

Abuse Stop, Search Powers

to Target Protesters

August 19th, 11:34am (FNA)


Stop and searches in central London increase by 

more than a fifth on weekends, when protests

 take place, according to civil liberties 

campaigners who say police are 

misusing the tactic, to 

deliberately target 



Except in special circumstances, stop and search can 

be used only for a handful of specific reasons, mostly

 covering drugs, weapons and stolen goods, 

suggesting, according to activists, that 

police are stretching the limits of 

their powers, The Guardian



“Our research shows an alarming pattern of police

 disproportionately using existing powers --- to 

deliberately target people exercising their 

right to protest,” said Mark Johnson,

 legal and policy officer at Big 

Brother Watch (BBW).


The civil liberties group’s investigation into stop and 

search data comes as Priti Patel, home secretary, is 

proposing a significant extension of the grounds for 

justifying a search. A new public order bill now

 before MPs --- would allow police to search
anyone close to a protest ---
deemed to be 


“With new anti-protest legislation looming, this should 

come as a warning to anyone who believes in a free

society, where our democratic rights are 

protected,” Johnson said.


“The public order bill would grant officers new protest-

specific stop and search powers which can be used 

without suspicion. This is a disaster for civil 

liberties in the UK. Protest should be 

treated as a vital part of our 

democracy and not as an 

inherent threat. It is the 

job of the police, to 

facilitate peaceful 

protests, not to

inhibit them,” 

he added.


Big Brother Watch analysed stop and search data for

 central London, the arena for most of the UK’s most

 significant protests, for the summers of 2020 

and 2021.


On average weekends with protests, the number of 

stop and searches rose 20.5% above weekends 

without protests, suggesting, the researchers 

said, that police were targeting protesters,

 extensively, with the powers.


“Even when controlling for differing levels of

coronavirus restrictions ----- the number of 

stops in central London was significantly 

higher, on days there were protests 

compared to those without, even 

though the data shows, that the

demonstrators were no more 

likely to be arrested after a 

search, than the general 

public,” --- researchers 

ponted out.


The disproportionate targeting of black people, 

among other concerns, has made police stop 

and search powers highly controversial. 


Those weekends in the early summer of 2020 

when black people took part in Black Lives 

Matter anti-racism protests in central 

London saw the highest increase in 

the number of stop and searches, 

BBW’s analysis showed – 

although the rise was

 from a low baseline.


Patel’s public order bill, at committee stage in the 

Commons, will extend the reasonable grounds 

for a search to include a suspicion that 

someone is carrying items “made, 

adapted or intended to be used 

in connection with protest-

related offences”.


It will also grant police a new power to stop and search

 without suspicion, allowing any officer of the rank of 

inspector or above to make an order allowing 

officers to search anyone in a specified 

area for a specific period --- when 

protest-related offences may

 be committed.


A number of new protest-related offences are 

proposed in the bill, including locking on or 

going equipped to lock on, obstructing 

major transport works, interference 

with key national infrastructure, 

and causing disruption... 

by tunnelling.


Many of the proposals in the bill were previously

 knocked out of the Police, Crime, Sentencing 

and Courts Act by the House of Lords, 

but the Home Office has said they

are necessary to deal with 

“increasingly common” 

disruptive protests.


In a factsheet about the bill, officials highlighted the

 £4mln policing cost of protests by Insulate Britain 

last autumn, ongoing protests by Just Stop Oil, 

which officials claimed cost police £5.9mln 

already so far in 2022, the £37mln bill for 

Extinction Rebellion’s protests in April 

and October 2019, and a claim by the 

developers of an HS2 high-speed rail 

link, last October, that sustained 

protests had inflated the cost 

of that project by £80mln.


A Metropolitan police spokesperson said, “The Met

 is not targeting protesters in their use of stop and

 search. We fully understand and support every

one’s rights to protest and we are always 

mindful of how we use our powers, 

especially stop and search."


“During protests there is naturally a higher number 

of people on the streets, and so there is also an

 increased number of officers deployed to these

 footprints to manage the protests and ensure 

disruption is kept to a minimum for those
 are living, working and travelling
 the spokesperson said.


“Because of these factors, we would expect to 

see an increase in policing tactics being used 

– including stop and search,” the spokes-

person added.


Extinction Rebellion said, “Protest is essential to the 

healthy functioning of democracy, and as we move 

further into multiple crises of inequality and 

climate breakdown it is more important 

than ever that everyone is able to 

make their voice heard."


“Instead, the home secretary is using this moment of 

increased civil unrest to withdraw our democratic

 freedoms --- in a frenzied power grab. This 

discriminatory use of stop and search 

makes protests and the expression 

of dissent --- less accessible to 

marginalised people and the 

public order bill will only 

make the situation 

worse,” it added.




Lawyers Warn:

‘No Jab, No Job’ 
Policies in UK
 Set to Spark Deluge of
Employment Tribunals

August 2nd, 1:33pm (FNA)


 Lawyers expect a wave of legal action against UK 

companies over attempts to make sure staff are 

double-vaccinated against COVID, amid 

growing fears of draconian “no jab,
job” policies in the workplace.


Trade unions have criticised the government for 

encouraging the idea of mandatory vaccination 

for office staff: after transport secretary Grant

 Shapps, said it was a “good idea”... for 

companies to insist staff are double-

jabbed, The Independent reported.


Tech giant Google, has said mandatory jabs for US employees 

will later be rolled out to staff in 40 countries where it operates, 

and Mr Shapps said he expected some British firms will soon 

“require” full vaccination.


Employment lawyers told The Independent that British companies 

had been in touch to explore their options on putting COVID 

vaccination requirements in place.


“We’re definitely going to see a lot of employment tribunals on this,” 

said Elissa Thursfield, head of employment lawyer and a director 

at Gamlins Law – predicting a wave of vaccine-related 

discrimination claims in the months ahead.


Lawyers and union chiefs warned that a blanket approach to 

making jabs mandatory could breach the Equality Act by 

discriminating against some groups, including those 

with disabilities or certain religious beliefs.


“Having a blanket policy is almost always dangerous – it’s 

fraught with legal difficulties,” said Thursfield, adding, 

“For existing staff, if you don’t have a clause in your 

contract that says you can receive mandatory 

instructions on health, which is rare, that’s 

potentially a breach of contract... as
well as
 the discrimination claims.”


She added, “If the government pushes any further on this,

 in terms of encouraging employers, they are going to 

start getting into hot water.”


Charlie Thompson, an employment partner at law firm 

Stewarts, also predicted legal action against 

companies that don’t consider their 

vaccine policy carefully enough.


“If you’re not able to go back to your existing job, or
denied a job, and the employer’s justification
vaccination] doesn’t stack up, then I can see

 legal claims,” he said.


Responding to Shapps’ encouraging remarks about companies 

asking staff to get the jab, Labour leader Keir Starmer said he

 did not think “no jab no job” policies were wise.


“I don’t agree with that,” said Starmer.


“For day-to-day routines, access to the office, access to health 

services or dentistry or even food – I don’t agree with vaccine 

passports for day-to-day access,” said the Labour leader.


Downing Street has made clear the government has no plans to

bring legislation to make full-vaccination mandatory for entry

into offices.


Unison General Secretary Christina McAnea said the government 

should not be encouraging any form of “coercion” when it comes

 to employees getting the vaccine before returning to work.


“Only with widespread take-up can the virus be defeated,” she 

said, adding, “Achieving this requires persuasion and 

encouragement – not compulsion and coercion. 

Forcing people can only lead to needless 

confrontation at work and legal cases

 that could drag on for years.”


Unite’s National Health and Safety Adviser Rob Miguel said COVID

 vaccine compulsion would be a “bad” way for companies to 

encourage a return to work, and is “embroiled with issues 

such as equalities, human rights, privacy and 

ethical breaches”.


Goldman Sachs raised alarm bells last month when it sent a memo 

to UK staff saying the company “strongly encouraged” them to 

report their COVID vaccination status before returning to the 

office – before clarifying vaccination was not compulsory.


In the US, companies are beginning to be more severe in their 

demands. Google and Facebook, along with Delta and United 

airlines, have said full vaccination will be mandatory for staff.


The Independent understands leading UK companies are 

examining how they can make sure staff are double-

jabbed, despite potential legal difficulties.


Some keen on getting offices fully-staffed say employees have 

told them they are uncomfortable about returning to the office 

until all their colleagues are vaccinated.


Others have said they would not try to enforce 

any rules about the COVID vaccine.


Imran Hussain, director at Harmony Financial Services, said 

it would be “ridiculous” to try to draw up a policy about 



“The whole idea is highly undemocratic and draconian,” he said, 

adding, “People should be allowed to make their own decisions 

and if they wish to take the jab, that’s great.”


The Confederation of British Industry (CBI), warned 

against blanket mandatory policies on vaccination.


A spokesperson for the CBI said, “The bar for compulsory 

vaccination is high, and there will be few industries
this approach would be appropriate."


“However, in some sectors it could prove necessary. 

Wherever possible, businesses will be approaching 

questions like this trying to bring their staff with 

them,” the spokesperson added.





Planning ahead? Firms land 

Covid passport contracts

 that could last until 2023 

...even as UK govt hints
 could be dropped

July 30th, 3:06pm (RT)

The British government has awarded potentially years-long 

contracts to help develop a domestic vaccine passport, as 

Downing Street simultaneously hints that the whole idea 

could be abandoned... if enough people get the jab.


The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) published

 information earlier this week on two new contracts with 

private tech firms hired to work on the country’s 

“Covid-19 certification programme.”


US-based Entrust will receive close to £840,000 ($1.2 million) 

for the development of the NHS health pass. The deal will 

last until at least July next year but pricing for a two-year 

contract is already detailed in official documents, 

suggesting that the UK government may be 

eyeing a long-term arrangement.


While the contract was made available to the public online, 

information about specific services that Entrust will be 

providing has been completely redacted, with several 

pages of the document blacked out. 


The US tech company was awarded £250,000 earlier this 

year as part of its ongoing work on the health pass 

program. The contract raised eyebrows, after it 

was revealed that Entrust had openly boasted: 

about how Covid-19 vaccine passports could 

be retooled to create national IDs as part of 

the “infrastructure of the new normal.”


The DHSC also signed a 2nd vaccine passport contract 

this week, worth up to £873,000, with Cambridge, 

Massachusetts IT firm, Akamai Technologies.

 Like the agreement with Entrust, the one-

year deal is designed... so that it can be 

seamlessly extended for an additional 

12 months. The US firm pocketed 

£50,000 in May, as part of its

 involvement in the creation

 of the digital vaccine ID.


Akamai, which specializes in cybersecurity
purchased online identity
management company,
in 2019. 


In total, the government has now spent nearly
£23.6 million 
($32.9 million) on its Covid
certification programme,

 iNews reported.


The new contracts coincide with the introduction of new 

features on the NHS app', that will allow it to serve as a 

digital vaccine certificate. 


In a controversial reversal of its position on domestic 

health IDs, the government revealed last week that, 

starting from the end of September, proof of 

vaccination will be required... in order to 

enter nightclubs and attend events

 involving large crowds. 


With around 70% of adults in the country already vaccinated, 

UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab suggested on Thursday 

that the threat of the vaccine passport may be enough to 

“cajole” young people into getting the shot. 


“Once we’ve done that, the wider questions of vaccine 

certification become much less relevant and salient,”

 Raab said, suggesting that the whole plan could be 

dropped if vaccine uptake increases over the next

 two months. 


But the newly inked contracts seem to be sending mixed 

messages about the government’s intentions for the 

controversial health certificate. A spokesperson for

 the health department insisted back in June that

 the NHS app used to certify vaccination status 

would not be used as a national ID system, 

describing the scheme as a “simple and 

secure means” to allow for 

international travel. 




100,000+ Britons sign petition to
outlaw discrimination against 

unvaccinated as govt moves 

forward with Covid 

vaccine passports

July 20th, 11:32am (RT)


More than 100,000 people have called on the British 

government to review its plans to bring in vaccine 

passports and prevent discriminatory policies

 against people who have refused to be part 

of the national inoculation programme.


A petition which started in February has gathered pace 

on Tuesday, with thousands adding their names to the 

growing list of people, calling for the government 

to do more to prevent legalised ‘discrimination’ 

against people who aren’t vaccinated against 



“The Government must specifically outlaw discrimination 

based on vaccine status, this includes access to private 

businesses, jobs and public life. No individual should 

ever feel coerced into having a vaccine,” the 

petition states.


Tens of thousands of people signed the petition on Tuesday

 morning, following a day of unrest in the capital, in which, 

hundreds of angry protesters clashed with police, having

 called for the arrest of Prime Minister Boris Johnson.


Links to the petition have been widely shared across Twitter, 

with English band Right Said Fred receiving more than 

1,200 retweets on their call for people to sign. 


Others vented their anger in other ways on Twitter, calling 

once again, for the prime minister to be arrested. Many 

went as far as comparing the Covid-19 restrictions to

 Adolf Hitler’s Germany, with ‘Nazi’ trending on the 

social media platform. 


On Monday, people gathered outside the Palace of Westminster

 to protest measures aimed at preventing the continued spread

 of Covid-19 virus. While Monday, termed ‘Freedom Day’, saw 

the last of the major restrictions lifted, the government has 

laid out plans to mandate the use of vaccination 

certificates at crowded venues in England.


Despite having one of the world’s highest vaccination rates 

against Covid-19, many young people have elected not to 

get jabbed. Under the government’s current plans, 

unvaccinated individuals will be prohibited from 

entering venues - such as nightclubs - from 

September. Johnson’s government had, 

previously, ruled out the idea of
making the 
entry to venues be
dependent on 


The government’s U-turn came just hours after nightclubs 

were allowed to open for the first time in 16 months.
 the condemnation of Johnson’s plans, some
suggested, that mandatory vaccination
will help provide peace of mind
to some 
Covid-wary clubbers and others 

attending large gatherings.



COVID19 in the UK the story so far...
please see our Health page.

United Nations Universal Declaration on Bioethics and 

Human Rights, Article 6 - Consent: Any preventive, 

diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention 

is only to be carried out with the prior, free and 

informed consent of the person concerned. 

Article 3 - Human dignity and human rights: 

The interests and the welfare of the 

individual should have priority over 

the sole interest of science 

or society.


Roger Waters formerly of Pink Floyd, in an open letter,
 calls on his fellow musicians to boycott the Zionist
Israeli regime and follow the example of the cultural
boycott against the ex South African Apartheid regime.

“Given the inability or unwillingness of our governments
 [to act] …. I write to you now, my brothers and sisters …
 to ask you to join with me, and thousands of other artists
 around the world, to declare a cultural boycott on Israel,”
Roger Waters says in his letter.

Waters says the Zionist regime has been found guilty of
 major breaches of human rights and international law
 by international organizations, UN officials and the
International Court of Justice.

He touches on two such cases, saying the regime has been
 identified as perpetrating the “crime of Apartheid”, including
 in a statement on March 9th, 2012 by the UN Committee on
the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and the “crime of
ethnic cleansing” including in East Jerusalem (al-Quds).

Waters adds that he has been a member of the Boycott,
 Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against the
 Israeli regime’s occupation of the Palestinian lands and
 Tel Aviv’s violations of Palestinian human rights for 7
 years, and now wants other musicians to also join
anti-Israeli front.

“Please join me and all our brothers and sisters in global
 civil society in proclaiming our rejection of Apartheid in
 Israel & occupied Palestine, by pledging not to perform
 or exhibit in Israel or accept any award or funding from
 any institution linked to the government of Israel, until
 such time as Israel complies with international law
universal principles of human rights.” 

The former Pink Floyd Musician also says he has recently
 faced a boycott by the US media after his November 29th,
 2012 address at the UN on behalf of the Russell Tribunal.

In the address, he sought accountability for the Zionist
 regime’s violations of the international law and the lack
 of United Nations resolve that prevents the Palestinian
 people from achieving their inalienable rights,
the right of self-determination.



Tickets from



browse venues in Wales


02920 230130

Cash tickets from:

The Factory, Porth
Instrumental Music, Penygraig
Spillers Records, Cardiff

For more details visit

Twitter @TheFactoryPorth
01443 687080


Daytime Delights...

Starts at 1pm

The Parc & Dare, Treorchy

Lunchtime Concerts in the Lounge Bar.

Indulge in a delicious cake and a cup of tea
while enjoying music and sing-along songs
from fantastic Welsh musicians.

Ticket information:

The Cultural Services Booking & Information Line:

08000 147 111
or book online at



Mid Rhondda Modelling Club...

7pm - 9pm

Tonyrefail Comprehensive School
Mid Rhondda Modelling Club

has been running for over 30 years.

We meet on a regular basis

& enjoy making models for display.

We encourage both Gentlemen

and Ladies to attend,
and also young people aged 12+.

However, Young people under 16,
must be accompanied by an adult.

Ticket information

£1 contribution every week. Under 16's free

Telephone Mr. Davies on 01443 686658


 Comedy In The Laughter Lounge

The Park & Dare Theatre, Treorchy.


Join us once a month in the intimate setting
of the Laughter Lounge for some
top notch comedy with some of the
biggest and brightest

rising comedians on the circuit.

Laugh? You'll snort like a pig!

Hilarious - TimeOut.



Rhondda Records exists to express the Rhondda's
vision --- when it was confident, powerful, caring,
and socialist.

A Rhondda very aware
of the media's poisonous
tricks -- how they con working class people into
attacking each other, or racial groups, or, often,
even their best allies and friends... instead of
seeing their real enemies:--- an elite who hate
the very idea that working people can think,
create, or achieve a fairer society.

Thatcher said her proudest achievement was
Blair and New Labour - who parachuted in
careerists and expenses fiddlers - to stop
local Labour members having a say, and
who made genuine socialist MPs leave
the Labour party in disgust and many
members and voters to despair...
and the young to stop voting.

Jeremy Corbyn was always attacked because
he was trying to reverse all that New Labour
corruption --- that's why membership was
flooding in all over the UK - watch this
video in Kilburn, London: don't believe
the dripping poison of the media and
the corrupt MPs -- and understand
Jeremy's role !



March 22nd, 2018 
Karl Rogers Analysis, UK
Spread the word: Facebook Twitter

On 20 March, the Labour Party appointed Jennie Formby
as its new general secretary. The right-wing press
immediately attacked her appointment.

 Ignoring her formidable record as a union organiser and
work in the NEC, Formby has been represented as
Jeremy Corbyn’s puppet - and as evidence of his
 “hard-left” seizure of the Labour Party machine.
But it’s obvious why the press barons
running scared.

Media red scaremongering

Formby barely had time to update her Linkedin profile
and Twitter feed...  before the right-wing press came
gunning for her. Predictably, the billionaire-owned
 propaganda machine, spun the news of her
 appointment, as a sinister seizure of power
by Corbyn & Unite leader Len McCluskey.

The Telegraph ran the headline: Corbyn and McCluskey
 tighten grip on Labour party as ally Jennie Formby
 appointed party’s new general secretary. The
 Express went with: Corbyn cements grip on
Labour as hard-left union boss Formby
named general secretary. The Sun
also framed the appointment as
an imposed “hard-left” takeover
 of the Labour Party. And The
Times declared “moderates
are no longer welcome”
 in the Labour Party.

Heather Stewart, political editor of The Guardian,
termed the appointment a “coronation” and
declared it the culmination of Corbyn’s
“two-year battle” to gain “complete
 control of the party machine”.

She has been a member of the Labour Party for 40 years.

She was regional officer in the UK’s largest trade union
– Unite – for 17 years. In 2004, she became the national
officer for Unite’s Food, Drink, and Tobacco Sector.

Between 2013 and 2016, she was political director
 of Unite, before becoming the southeast regional
secretary. She has been on the NEC for
seven years.

In other words, her appointment to general secretary of
the Labour Party, is the result of her experience and
abilities as a trade union organiser.

As Corbyn said, when he congratulated Formby:

''Her talent, experience and commitment to the Labour
and Trade Union movement, makes me confident
will play a crucial role in building on last
inspiring General Election advance
and taking
our party forward to victory.''

Her predecessor, Iain McNicol, said:

''As someone who has dedicated her life to fighting for
workers’ rights, equality and social justice, I know
Jennie will put all the commitment, drive and
organising talent, into getting Labour into
government and Jeremy into Number 10.''

Running scared

The press is scared of Formby......
she will be good at her job.

Get Involved!


Jewish Labour Movement Chair & exec
call for investigation into Israeli

5th of February 2017
by Mike Sivier

This is deeply disturbing information
 from the Skwawkbox. Read:

Riverside Labour MP Louise Ellman is Chair of the JLM
(Jewish Labour Movement) and vice-Chair of Labour
Friends of Israel (LFI). The former organisation is
highly controversial because of its affiliation with
 the openly pro-apartheid Israeli Labour Party
‘Havoda’ and the latter as it was specifically
mentioned by the Israeli
embassy operative
filmed by an
undercover Al Jazeera reporter,

 in connection with his actions: in setting up
pro-Israeli groups
inside the Labour party.

Supporters of both groups have been prominent
in the discredited, but persisting, antisemitism
smear against the national party.

And it appears that Ms Ellman and her allies in
 Riverside CLP – in spite of the obvious conflict
 of interest – have no intention of allowing
members to add their voices to the calls
for a full Labour investigation into the
 infiltration of the party by a foreign

Source: JLM Chair and exec block CLP call
for investigation into Israeli interference:



REVEALED: NUS official colluded with
Israeli embassy to oust student leader
Middle East Eye

by Mike Sivier
of Vox Political

The worms are coming out of the woodwork now.

Shall we pencil in the Union of Jewish Students
as one of Shai Masot’s “front” organisations for
 the Israeli government?

A senior official from the UK’s National
 Union of Students, has been covertly
filmed conspiring --- to oust the NUS
president Malia Bouattia as part of a
 sting involving the Israeli embassy.

An undercover Al-Jazeera reporter – known
only as Robin – posed as a political activist
with links to the now disgraced Israeli
diplomat Shai Masot - to investigate
 the influence the Israeli embassy
 exerts on British politics.

“Robin” is heard discussing how to oust
Ms Bouattia from her position as NUS
president with NUS Vice President
Richard Brooks --- after Masot
 introduces him as the Chair
of the Young Labour
Friends of Israel.



Ms Walker, a lifelong anti-racist campaigner and
 socialist, was suspended from the Labour Party
 in May, amidst allegations of anti-Semitism. She
was reinstated but has been suspended again, 
after apparently being “set up” at a training
event organised by the Jewish Labour
Movement during the party’s national
conference in September.

She writes: “I was suspended from the Labour Party
in May of this year, amidst what appears to have
a breach of Data Protection law, by Iain
McNicol, as
General Secretary of the
Labour Party.

“I was suspended for the alleged (subsequently
cleared) charge of antisemitism. As a Jewish
person, whose partner is Jewish, this was

“Since May I have continued to be targeted by
 the media, in print, online and in other places.

“Currently I am suspended for questions asked at
 a training session on ‘Confronting Antisemitism
& Engaging Jewish Voters’ at this year’s Labour
Conference, after being unethically filmed by a
 Jewish Labour Movement campaigns officer
who is also a Labour councillor. It seems this
training was not a ‘safe space for all Jews’
by any means.

“As soon as the first article was released before
my notification had even arrived, trolls circled
the kill, posting spooky blacked up faces
worse) to my Facebook account. The
& national newspapers led the
querying my Jewish identity (a
racist move
in itself), my work as an
anti-racist activist
and my political

“When my suspension was lifted, things got worse.
Indignation at my alleged breach reached the heights
 of irony, when Nigel Farage, anxious not to miss out
on the fun being had by among others, the Spectator,
a number of Labour MPs and officers of the Party...
 dedicated an article in Breitbart, and a good
of righteous indignation on national
TV, to
publicly calling me out as a racist.

“The widespread hate campaign against me, led
to public abuse, strangers shouting ‘racist’ as I
walked to the tube. With the murderous racist
political discourse now taking the place of
debate, I became conscious I was
recognisable on the street.

“My story is just one of many where Labour members
have found themselves in a similar position. While
 this may not be the only case where a breach has
 occurred, as I was abroad at the time, it may well
be the most provable.

“We invite anybody who has a personal interest
in this case, or the wider public, to contribute.”

Solicitor Martin Howe, representing Ms Walker,
added: “Jackie Walker has faced a barrage of
 hurtful, threatening & nasty abuse since the
 private details of her investigation by the
Labour Party over alleged anti-Semitism
leaked to the press before she even
of her suspension by the Party.

“This apparent breach of her private data has
had a devastating impact on her public and
private well-being and has led directly to her
being pre-judged & unfairly cast as a racist
-- before she was given any opportunity to
her side of the story.

“Data Protection laws are there to protect all
of us and any breach is a very serious matter.”

If you would like to contribute to her fund,
details are on the web page.

Source: CrowdJustice –
Crowdfund public interest law

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget
 to share it. Politics is about everybody – so
try to get everybody involved!


Get Involved!

– If you feel you’ve been ‘purged’,
take this online survey:


or this one:


– Request all your own data that
the Labour Party holds on you:


– Sign the petition in support of
Jeremy Corbyn, if you agree:




“Any member who is suspended & intends
to appeal the decision should throw in a
 ‘Subject Access Request in accordance
with the Data Protection Act’ --- for ALL
 data that the Labour Party hold on them.

The Labour Party are Data Controllers and
 therefore have to, by law, provide you with
 all material/information they hold on you.”

If anyone is in contact with anyone who
was barred from voting --- please can
you pass this info on:

The Labour leadership election was under the
jurisdiction of the electoral reform services.

If you were unfairly deprived of your vote you
can call them on 0208 365 8909 and lodge
 your complaint, and inform them of your
Data Protection request.


The notification letters barring new members
did not give a clear reason, or information on
how to appeal, so Vox Political suggests that
 anyone in this situation, could also contact
 Liz Davies here: http://www.whycantivote.com

She is a barrister --- who can
advise members on what to do.



1)  "Military action was not a last resort".

2) UK government "undermined the
of the UN security council.

3) Weapons of Mass Destruction presented
 "with a certainty that was not justified".

4) UK forces were "ill-prepared".

5a) "The government failed to
achieve its stated objectives."

5b) Post-war planning: Blair "should
 have known what might happen".

6) Chilcot says Blair also "overlooked the
 threat the invasion would pose to Britain."


Blair to Face Law

The former prime minister has been put on notice
 by families of dead servicemen, that he will face
 legal action, for his part in the illegal Iraq war.

They are being crowd-funded now, and
have raised so much money, that Blair
probably heading for a big fall...

Shadow Commons leader Paul Flynn:
the Iraq Inquiry's findings are an "utter
 condemnation" of his terrible decision
 --- and his prosecution should now be
given "serious consideration".

Former Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond:
"I would like to see Blair investigated by
International Criminal Court (ICC),
the crime of a war of aggression,
face parliamentary action to
him holding public office
ever again."

A former British ambassador to the UN:
 "The UK was pushed into entering
military action, too early."

Stop the War Coalition Convener Ms German:
“This is an incredibly damning report for Tony Blair.
It will not call for legal sanctions, but it says that
Blair is culpable for the war, in many ways.

“He needs to be driven out of public life. He is
still part of the Labour Party. We need to make
 sure that truth & justice prevails. There must
 be legal action against Blair, & he should no
 longer be considered fit for any office.”

CND general secretary Kate Hudson:
 “The report shows that Tony Blair had
no respect for cabinet procedure, no
respect for Parliament, & no respect
for international law.

“Chilcot reveals the evidence that must now be
 used to bring Tony Blair to justice. This is our
 demand. Only when justice is served, can we
prevent disasters like the Iraq war from ever
happening again.”

 Iraqi journalist Juma al-Quraishi:
"Everyone who took part in the war against Iraq
should be condemned, either Britain, or others."

Baghdad resident Ali al-Saraji:
"Ex-UK prime minister, Tony Blair, destroyed
 our country. From 2003, to now, our country
has been the scene of destruction, killing,
massacres, explosions and sectarianism."

A defiant Blair refuses to accept accusations
 from service families that he was wrong and
reckless, and he insists that he would make
 the decision again, 'come what may'.

 Families of some of the 179 military personnel
 killed in Iraq, say the former PM is "a terrorist".

 Jeremy Corbyn has offered an apology,
 on Labour's behalf, for the "stain on
our party and our country".


Tony Blair: Guilty In The
 Eyes Of The Public
August 1st
by Steve Sweeney

Teflon Tony Blair escaped justice yet again yesterday -
after High Court judges blocked a private prosecution
against the former PM for war crimes over the
invasion of Iraq.

Campaigners accused the Establishment of a “concerted
 and coordinated effort” to exonerate Mr Blair for his role
 in the Iraq war, in which one million people were killed.

Stop the War Coalition convener Lindsey German branded
Mr Blair as “the most protected war criminal in the world.”
However, she said: “In the court of public opinion
he has
long been found guilty.”

Iraqi General Abdul Wahed Shannan al-Rabbat had sought
 a private prosecution against Mr Blair, along with then
foreign secretary Jack Straw and attorney general
 Lord Goldsmith.

He accused Mr Blair of committing a “crime of aggression”
 by invading Iraq in 2003 and his lawyers asked permission
 from the High Court to seek judicial review to get the
Supreme Court to overturn a 2006 House of Lords
ruling that there is no such crime under the law
 of England and Wales.

Gen al-Rabbat brought the case after Westminster magistrates
refused to issue summonses in November last year claiming
 the trio had immunity from prosecution for decisions taken
 while in government.

However the appeal was dismissed yesterday by the Lord
 Chief Justice as having “no prospect” of succeeding.

But Michael Mansfield QC said that the findings of the
Chilcot Report justified the prosecution of Mr Blair.

He said that the inquiry showed Saddam Hussein did not
pose an urgent threat to British interests and that the
 intelligence regarding weapons of mass destruction
 had been presented with “unwarranted certainty.”

The QC said that as the international crime of a war of
aggression had been accepted at the time of the
Nuremberg trials of nazi war crimes, it was the
duty of British courts to follow the example
and prosecute those responsible for the
 Iraq war.

The Nuremberg judges had said that war “is essentially
 an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the
 belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world.

“To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an
international crime; it is the supreme international crime
differing only from other war crimes in that it contains
within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament general secretary
Kate Hudson branded the decision as “hugely
disappointing” and said that “justice had
been left undone.”

She said: “Last year’s Chilcot report showed that Blair
had no respect for Cabinet procedure, no respect for
Parliament and no respect for international law.

“Iraq was devastated by the war Blair led Britain into,
 millions of innocent Iraqis were killed, British
were killed and terrorism has
spread across the
Middle East.

“Chilcot revealed the evidence that must now be used
 to bring Blair to justice. Only when justice is served
can we prevent disasters like the Iraq war from
happening again.”

(Source - Morning Star)



A huge drop in working-class Labour MPs,
caused a massive drop in support among
 voters with similar backgrounds, reveals
 research seeking to explain why support
has dwindled in the party’s heartlands.

The study says past leaders like Kinnock
 and Blair made a concerted effort to pick
 “more and more middle-class candidates
to run for office, during the 80s and 90s,
 as part of an effort to rebrand” -- which
had initial successes at the ballot box.

But this “conscious electoral strategy”
stored up problems, as working-class
 voters who initially, just didn’t vote in
response, now seek an alternative.

The solution? Trust each constituency to put
forward its own candidates, and don't impose
 ‘party-approved’ choices who can't do the job.

Now, unfortunately, there are "entryist"  MPs who, for
decades, have been groomed by CIA cold war relic
organisations -- like the Atlantic Council -- and are
now trying to misdirect the Labour Party towards
cuts, a militarised police, and a US war agenda...

- and their anti-Corbyn slant is hobbling Labour.

‘How Can I Deselect My Labour MP?’ A Short Guide
to Reselection and Democratic Accountability
by Eric Sim, excellent free advice here:




Chris Bryant, the Rhondda's dodgy MP,
was on TV -- as soon as the PLP coup
started -- telling us that Jeremy MUST
go, because it was the ONLY way to
act in the Labour Party's interest...

Chris Bryant's voting record:
from TheyWorkForYou.com

On Tuition Fees:

On 27 Jan 2004:
Chris Bryant voted in favour of university tuition
fees increasing from £1,125 per year, to up to
£3,000 per year.

On 31 Mar 2004:
Chris Bryant voted to allow university tuition fees
 to increase from £1,125 per year, to up to £3,000
 per year.

On 31 Mar 2004:
Chris Bryant voted for the introduction of variable
university tuition fees (top-up fees) of up to £3,000
per year in place of the previous fixed fee of £1,250
per year.

On 31 Mar 2004:
Chris Bryant voted to allow university tuition fees
to increase from £1,125 per year to up to £3,000
per year, and to make other changes to higher
education funding and regulation arrangements.

On 14 Sep 2004:
Chris Bryant voted against: the immediate abolition
 of all tuition fees, the re-introduction of maintenance
grants of up to £2,000 for students from low-income
homes, and changes to the country's higher
education system.

On 14 Sep 2004:
Chris Bryant voted to reject the Liberal
Democrat policy of abolition of tuition fees.

On 25 May 2016:
Chris Bryant was absent for a vote on Queen's
Speech - Forcing Schools to Become Academies
- Further Rises in University Tuition Fees

On Human Rights:

Consistently voted for introducing ID cards

Almost always voted for requiring the mass
retention of information about communications

Generally voted for mass surveillance of
people’s communications and activities

On the Environment:

Generally voted against greater regulation
 of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) to extract
 shale gas

On Special Interests:

Almost always voted against limits
 on success fees paid to lawyers in
no-win no fee cases

Generally voted against a
statutory register of lobbyists

On War or Peace:

Generally voted for use of UK military
 forces in combat operations overseas

Consistently voted for the Iraq war

Consistently voted against an
 investigation into the Iraq war

Generally voted for replacing Trident
 with a new nuclear weapons system

On 2 Dec 2015:
Voted to support UK airstrikes in Syria
[without UN authorisation]

On 2 Dec 2015:
Voted to support UK airstrikes in Syria
[without UN authorisation]

On Independence:

Generally voted for more EU integration


Chris Bryant Labour MP
From Wikipedia

(aka 1962-1986: Mr Christopher John Bryant
1986-1991: The Reverend Christopher John
Bryant, 1991-2001: Mr Christopher John
Bryant, 2001-: Mr Christopher John
Bryant MP.)

Born in Cardiff, to a Scottish mother & a Welsh
 father, Bryant grew up in Cardiff, Wales (where
 his father worked for 5 years), and Cheltenham.

He was educated at Cheltenham College, an
independent school for boys in the spa town
of Cheltenham in Gloucestershire, where he
was captain of the school swimming team,
and Mansfield College at the University of
Oxford, where he graduated in 1983, with
 a Bachelor of Arts (BA) degree in English.
 This was later promoted to a Master of
Arts degree (MA (Oxon)), as per tradition.

After completing his first degree, Bryant began
 training to be a priest in the Church of England
at Ripon College, Cuddesdon, in Oxfordshire.
There, he obtained a degree in theology.

Although a member of the Conservative
 Party, and an elected office-holder in the
 Oxford University Conservative Association,
he joined the Labour Party in 1986, after
leaving Oxford.

He was ordained deacon in 1986 and priest in
1987. He served as a Curate at the Church of
 All Saints, High Wycombe, from 1986 to 1989;
then as a Youth Chaplain in Peterborough,
as well as travelling in Latin America.

In 1991 Bryant left the ordained ministry, after
deciding that being gay and being a priest,
were incompatible. Statements made by
 Richard Harries, then Bishop of Oxford,
 also influenced his decision.

After leaving the priesthood in 1991, Bryant
worked as the election agent to the Holborn
 and St Pancras Constituency Labour Party,
 where he helped Frank Dobson hold his seat
 in the 1992 general election.

From 1993, he was Local Government officer
for the Labour Party; he lived in Hackney and
 was elected to Hackney Borough Council in
1993, serving until 1998. He became Chair of
the Christian Socialist Movement.

 He is both a member of the Labour Friends
 of Israel and Labour Friends of Palestine &
 the Middle East. From 1994 to 1996 he was
 London manager of the leader-grooming
 "charity", Common Purpose.

 He was Labour candidate for Wycombe, in the
 1997 general election (he lost by 2,370 votes),
and Head of European Affairs for the BBC,
from 1998.

His selection for the very safe Labour seat of
Rhondda, South Wales in 2000, shocked many
 people given Bryant's background – gay, an ex-
Anglican vicar, and someone who was a Tory,
while studying at Oxford, and a member now,
of the Henry Jackson Society 'think tank' ---
 described by The Guardian newspaper as
 'neoconservative'. It is pro-US, pro-NATO
and pro-military intervention, as well as
being fundamentally anti-socialist.

 Fifty-two people applied for the candidature
and a local councillor was hot favourite to
 win, before Bryant was parachuted in.

In 2004, a photograph of Mr Bryant in his
 underpants, which he had posted to a gay
 dating website, was published in 'papers.

When an interviewer suggested he was
 a 'disgrace to the Rhondda', he replied:
"They can't get rid of me."

His pay, allowances and some expenses:

The basic annual salary for an MP, from
April 1st, 2016 is £74,962.  MPs also get
 expenses: to cover the costs of running
 an office, employing staff, having some-
where to live in London, plus, in their
constituency and travelling between
 Parliament and their constituency.

His MP's expenses story:

Chris Bryant changed second home
 twice to claim £20,000: the deputy
leader of the House of Commons,
 "flipped" his second home twice,
 in 2 years, allowing him to claim
 almost £20,000 for renovations
 and fees.

Chris Bryant, MP for the Rhondda, split over
 £92,000 of expenses between 3 properties
 in Wales and London --- within five years.

In 2004, he attempted to claim £58,000 to
 overhaul his second home in Wales, after
allegedly complaining that properties in
his constituency were "terrace or mine
 owners' houses".

Mr Bryant, a former Church of England clergyman,
wanted the money for a new bathroom & kitchen,
 and to demolish his conservatory. He'd bought the
 detached house for £97,500, under a year earlier.

 He submitted a claim to the Commons fees office for
 £58,493.26 --- almost 3 times the annual maximum.
 He noted that the claim exceeded his allowance.

His alleged justification was disclosed... in
 correspondence between Commons officials.
 By email, an official wrote: "He had problems
finding a suitable property because in the
Rhondda there is a choice mainly of terraced
 property or mine owners' houses." When
approached by the Daily Telegraph,
Mr Bryant said: "I have never said
 or thought anything of the sort".

 In all, he successfully claimed over £13,000
 for renovations, repairs & appliances, in 2004.
Along with other bills, his annual claim was

In April 2005, he flipped his expenses to his flat in
 west London, which he bought for £400,000 in April
 2002. He also claimed £630 a month for mortgage
 interest, along with other bills. After claiming over
 £3,600 over 3 months, he sold the flat in July 2005
 for £477,000.

Mr Bryant used his profits to buy a more expensive
 flat in west London, which was valued at £670,000.
 He immediately flipped his second home expenses
 there, claiming almost £6,400 in stamp duty, legal
fees and mortgage fees, incurred in the purchase.

He then began claiming interest of £1,000 a month
on the mortgage. He also claimed a further £6,000
 a year for the flat's service charge and ground rent.

In all, he claimed £92, 415 in second
home expenses, from 2004 to 2009.

Mr Bryant said at the time: "I moved flat in
 London, so as to be closer to Parliament."

Research by Channel 4 News in 2015 found that
at least 46 MPs had this kind of system in place
– a move one Labour backbencher described as
“a new fiddle”. Channel 4 reported then:

“Our investigation found that many of the MPs
 bought their London properties with the help of
the taxpayer, when a previous expenses system
 allowed them to claim back mortgage payments.
But when those claims were banned, following
 the expenses scandal, they switched to letting
out their properties, in some cases for up to
 £3,000 a month. They then started claiming
 expenses for rent and hotels in the capital.”

Among those identified was Chris Bryant, shadow
leader of the House of Commons. He had already
 bought a penthouse in London back in 2005 and
 claimed around £1,000 a month in mortgage
claims under the old system.

But after the expenses scandal, he started renting
the property out. It’s since been advertised by estate
 agents as having a private lift and a porter, with rent
 at about £3,000 a month. Meanwhile, Bryant moved
 into a new flat;- claiming his own rent on expenses.

Image: Wales elderly paying for health care

Figures released by The Office for National Statistics
(ONS) reveal that UK pensioners are 4th worst off....
out of all of the countries in the European Union.


Survey Finds UK
Failing on Childcare

September 13th, 11:13am (FNA)

Tens of thousands of working parents said the government

 is failing them with inadequate childcare policies that leave

 them financially crippled, stymied in their careers and 

desperate for radical change, according to a 

major survey.


The survey of more than 20,000 working parents, which was 

shared with the Guardian and involved more than a dozen 

organisations, found that 96% believed ministers were 

not doing enough to support parents with the cost 

and availability of childcare while 97% said 

childcare in the UK was too expensive.


One-third of parents said they paid more for childcare than 

their rent or mortgage. This proportion rose to 38% for 

both those in full-time work or were single parents, 

and to 47% of respondents from a black ethnic 



The survey comes before a debate on childcare in parliament 

on Monday that was triggered after over 100,000 parents 

signed a petition calling for an independent review of 

childcare funding and affordability.


According to data from the Organisation for Economic Co-

operation and Development, the UK has the third most 

expensive childcare system in the world, behind only 

Slovakia and Switzerland; a full-time place costs 

£12,376 a year on average.


Research by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) found that 

between 2008 and 2016 the cost of a one-year-old child’s 

nursery provision grew four times faster than wages in 

England. In London, it was more than 7 times faster.


Warnings that the early years sector is at risk of collapse have 

been largely ignored and morale is low: research by Nursery 

World, found that one in 10 childcare workers, is living

 in poverty.


Justine Roberts, the chief executive of the online forum Mumsnet, 

said, “This is a problem that’s been hiding in plain sight for years,

 and parents know exactly how badly they’re being failed. The 

government must not ignore the misery and stress this 

issue causes for parents across the whole country.”


The survey found that people who were struggling the most were 

on the lowest incomes, on universal credit, were single parents,

 had disabilities or had a black ethnic background. One in three 

parents with a household income of less than £20,000 has had 

to cut back on essential food or housing as a direct result of 

childcare bills, while four in 10 single parents have had to

 use credit cards to pay for essential items.


Ninety-two percent of parents said the cost of childcare had 

affected their standard of living, while 50% said the cost was 

completely unaffordable or had resulted in a substantial 

impact. Ninety-four percent of parents who changed their 

working patterns after having children... said childcare 

costs were a factor in the decision.


The survey also revealed how heavily parents relied on family 

for childcare – while 75% used private nurseries for childcare,

 56% of parents said they relied on grandparents for help. 

Overall, the survey found 99% of all respondents agreed 

that childcare should be recognised as a vital part of the

 UK’s economic and social infrastructure.


Joeli Brearley, the founder of the charity Pregnant Then Screwed, 

said, “All we want from the government is transparency. The cost 

of childcare continues to increase, forcing more parents out of 

their jobs, and the quality of our early years settings decrease, 

which will have serious long-term consequences for all of us.

 We don’t believe the government has a grasp of how big the 

issue is... and the impact it is having on families and

 the economy.”


The survey was produced and distributed by.. Mumsnet, Pregnant 

Then Screwed, the TUC, the Fawcett Society, the Women’s Budget 

Group, Gingerbread, Working Families, the Fatherhood Institute, 

Maternity Action, Music Football Fatherhood, Mother Pukka, 

Tova Leigh, Black Mums Upfront, the Young Women’s Trust 

and Cathy Reay (That Single Mum).


The data, which was not weighted, was collected from 20,046 parents

 in the UK with at least one child aged 18 or under, carried out 

between 20 July and 31 August 2021 – with 97% of the

respondents being women.


It presented compelling evidence, that lack of access to childcare 

was preventing progress on gender equality. Only 16% of women 

said childcare had not affected their seniority or income at work, 

compared with 42% of men. Of the female respondents, 83% 

said childcare costs and availability affected mothers more 

than fathers; 41% of male respondents said it affected 

parents equally. Two-thirds of female respondents 

reduced their hours after having a baby,

 compared with 26% of men.


Felicia Willow, the chief executive of the Fawcett Society, said, 

“Our government cannot drop the ball on this – it’s clear that 

a lack of access to childcare is stopping women both going 

to work and progressing at work.”


The survey also suggested the government’s flagship shared 

parental leave policy was a particular failure; only 17% of 

respondents said it was useful for their family.


Ros Bragg, the director of Maternity Action, said, “The deeply 

flawed shared parental leave has been about as helpful to 

working parents as a chocolate teapot. Take-up rate 

among eligible families is now less than 4% in its 

fifth year of operation. It’s clear that we need to 

start again.”


Elliott Rae, the founder of Music Football Fatherhood, said...

“Extortionate childcare costs reinforce traditional gendered

parenting roles and make it difficult for dads to have 

flexibility in their work and be fully active and 

engaged fathers.”


The survey suggested that respondents wanted to see a radical

 overhaul of the childcare system: 90% of all parents supported 

at least three months of “use-it-or-lose-it” parental leave for 

fathers, paid at at least minimum wage level, while 94% 

believed subsidised childcare should start from the 

end of paid maternity leave.


Frances O’Grady, the TUC secretary general, said, “We don’t 

want tinkering around the edges. Our broken parental leave 

system is in need of a complete overhaul.”


The Department for Education said parents’ ability to claim 30

 “free” hours a week during term time for three- and four-year

-olds could save them up to £5,000 a year and the number of

 childcare places offered by providers was stable.


A spokesperson said early years providers had been given 

financial support during the pandemic, and the government 

had invested £3.5bln yearly in childcare since 2018, adding,

 “We’re making millions more available through our 

recovery fund to level up children’s early 

outcomes, raising the quality of early 

education even further.”




Watchdog Finds UK Police 

Tasering Children and
Mentally ill People

August 25th, 1:37pm (FNA)


Police must be trained to use Tasers only when “absolutely 

necessary”, a watchdog said, after a review found the

weapons were being used against children and

mentally ill people.


The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) reviewed 

around 100 of the most serious cases involving Tasers in 

England and Wales, including 16 where people died, The 

Independent reported.


Inquests found that the use of Taser contributed to four 

of those deaths, and inquiries are ongoing in others, 

including the killing of former footballer, Dalian 

Atkinson, by PC Benjamin Monk.


Last year, a coroner who examined the death of 30-year-old 

father Marc Cole, warned that “future deaths will occur,

unless action is taken”, but the Home Office rejected 

his call for a review of the physical effects of Tasers.


The IOPC said they had been used on people with underlying 

health problems, including epilepsy and heart conditions, 

and that, in some cases – including three where people 

died – officers had suspected they were “feigning 

being unwell”.


A report published on Wednesday also raised concerns about 

the “increasing use of Tasers on children and vulnerable 

people with mental health, drug and alcohol issues”.


The review warned that police had used the weapons in 

unsafe locations, and had not always considered the 

“risk of injury”, properly.


In a quarter of the cases examined, Tasers had been wrongly 

used to make people “comply with instructions”, and in a

third, officers had missed opportunities to de-escalate 



The IOPC said that current Taser use was threatening public 

trust in the police, especially over the disproportionate use 

against Black men.


IOPC director general Michael Lockwood stated, “Tasers are 

available to more officers than ever before, but engagement 

with communities has highlighted a stark difference 

between their expectations about when a Taser 

should be used, and the situations in which a

Taser can be used, under current national 

guidance, particularly on those who 

are vulnerable.


“Police forces must be able to explain this clearly, or risk

further eroding public confidence,” Lockwood added.


Lockwood said that although Tasers were a valuable tool 

for protecting both the public and police officers... 

independent scrutiny must ensure that they
used appropriately.


“Clearer national guidance on the circumstances in which Tasers

should and should not be used - and better training - will improve 

officer safety, as well as give the public reassurance that Tasers

are being used, only when absolutely necessary,” he added.


“Police forces must be able to justify to the public the 

circumstances in which a Taser is deployed, 

particularly when children and vulnerable 

people are involved. Forces must also 

respond to the disproportionate use 

of Tasers against Black people,” 

he said.


The IOPC made 17 recommendations, including improvements 

to police guidance and training, the scrutiny and monitoring 

of Taser use and data and research.


The Inquest charity said they do not go far enough and called for

“systemic change”, saying Tasers were dangerous weapons, 

that had resulted in serious injury and death.


“They are increasingly used, as a first, not last resort,” added 

Director Deborah Coles, adding, “Ultimately to prevent further 

deaths and harm, we must look beyond policing and redirect 

resources into community, health, welfare and 

specialist services.”


The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of 

Policing announced research on racial disproportionality in 

police use of Tasers last year.


A National Taser Stakeholder Advisory Group in this area has 

also been set up, and there are new conflict management 

guidelines and training proposals.


The NPCC said the IOPC’s review only covered 0.1 percent of

all Taser use, because so few cases had been referred to 

the watchdog.


Home Office figures record Taser use if the weapons are 

drawn, used to plant a red target dot on a suspect, or 

fired. In 86 percent of recorded Taser incidents, 

they are not fired.


Chief Constable Lucy D’Orsi, the national police lead on 

Tasers, said work was already underway... to make



“Focusing on these smaller number of cases missed an 

opportunity to consider Taser use more broadly and, 

unfortunately, has resulted in recommendations 

which are mostly out of date and not based
 the realities of policing,” she added.


“Policing is not easy and in many violent situations I believe 

Taser is a viable, less lethal option for officers, between 

using a baton and the lethal force of a gun. Taser has 

a critical place in protecting the public and our 

officers,” she said.


The IOPC said it could only investigate “the most serious 

and sensitive cases” because of its remit, and aimed to 

contribute to the growing evidence base around 

Taser use.


The Association of Police and Crime Commissioners said
would act as a bridge between police forces and the
to ensure concerns were addressed.


The watchdog also uncovered evidence that some officers made

inappropriate comments, including derogatory remarks, during 

these incidents, in an analysis of 101 investigations involving 

Tasers, between 2015 and 2020.


Some 60 percent of Black people involved in Taser discharges 

were subjected to continuous discharges of more than five 

seconds, compared with 29 percent of White people.


The longest length of continuous use, was 67 seconds.




Watchdog Finds UK Police

 Failing to Impose Orders 

on Men Accused of Abuse

August 24th, 12:05pm (FNA)


Police are failing to impose restraining orders
bail conditions on men accused of rape,

domestic abuse, harassment and 

stalking, a watchdog found --- 

placing women and girls at

 increased risk of harm.


A police super-complaint, submitted by the Centre

 for Women’s Justice (CWJ), raised concerns that 

police were failing to use protective measures
cases involving violence against women
girls, The Guardian reported.


A joint investigation between HM Inspectorate of 

Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services, the 

Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), 

and the College of Policing found there was
lack of understanding in police forces of 
how and/or when to use such protective 

measures, which could lead to women
and girls being 
harmed, or victims 

being less likely to report crime 

in the future.


However, the CWJ expressed disappointment that 

the recommendations did not go far enough.


Nogah Ofer, a solicitor at the CWJ, stated, “The super-

complaint recommendations are welcome. However, 

they do not get to grips with the severity of the 

problem, or go far enough to ensure that 

police forces make real changes 

in practice."


 “Some recommendations, require improved data-gathering,

 and tell chief constables in general terms to prioritise and 

monitor use of orders, but there is a lack of specifics and 

no discussion of under-resourcing, which is the elephant 

in the room. We fear that in five years’ time the situation 

will not be much different to today,” Ofer added.


The report made several recommendations, including that 

chief constables should ensure their officers understand 

all the protective measures available & the Home Office 

and Ministry of Justice should intensify and accelerate 

their consideration of creating a bespoke offence, of 

breaching pre-charge bail.


The director general of the IOPC, Michael Lockwood, said: 

“Police have a key role in protecting vulnerable people 

and this super-complaint has highlighted clear gaps 

where improvements must be made in protecting 

vulnerable women and girls."


“The right training, support, guidance... and leadership, is 

critical to police using protective measures to help keep 

women and girls safe from harm," Lockwood added.


“However, this is a community-wide issue and one that 

needs not just a policing response, but a response 

from the whole criminal justice sector, non-

government organisations and others," 

he said.


“More than ever, we need a consistent approach to 

stopping appalling crimes of violence against 

women and girls, from occurring in the
place,” Lockwood added.

[Rhondda Records adds:

 Damned if you do, and damned if you
don't... think, change, and improve!!!]


UK head teacher prompts outrage, 

heated debate -- after revealing her 

school ban on ‘sexist’ expressions

 like ‘boys and girls’

April 29th, (RT)


UK head teacher prompts outrage, heated debate 

after revealing her school ban on ‘sexist’ 

expressions like ‘boys and girls’.


A UK primary school headmistress has kicked off a storm 

after revealing that she has instructed her teachers not to

 use a number of “sexist” phrases, including ‘let’s go, 

guys’ and ‘boys and girls’.


Sarah Hewitt-Clarkson, who heads the Anderton Park 

primary school in Birmingham, told the Good Morning 

Britain show on Thursday that students as young as 

three are taught to reject the use of the banned

 expressions by holding up posters.


The program – which has stoked fierce debate among 

parents – rewards the two students who flag the ‘best’

 instances of such usage with certificates at the end 

of the week.


“If our boys and girls grow up and in school we don’t 

challenge this sexist language and boys are told, 

‘man up’, ‘grow a pair’ and ‘boys don’t cry’, it’s 

very damaging for them...abusers later on 

potentially, or bullies, will also use this 

fear,” Hewitt-Clarkson said.


“Fear is the biggest weapon that abusers have and if 

boys are told, ‘boys don't get scared’, ‘boys don’t talk 

about their feelings’, then where are they going to go 

when they are afraid and they are frightened?” 

she added.


“Fast forward a little bit to when the children are older

 just to see why this is so important because it’s a tiny

 part of a huge jigsaw,” said Hewitt-Clarkson, who had 

previously said that there was a thread tying tragic 

outcomes like the murder of Sarah Everard to 

casual ‘banter’ and the examples adults set.


When asked how the school handled the resulting issues

 in addressing students in a classroom setting, Hewitt-

Clarkson said that the preferred greeting should be 

“good morning everyone” since that does not 

create a gender divide and includes people 

who might not identify as either sex.


Journalist Nana Akua, who was also part of the show, 

called the move “absolutely ridiculous” and warned

 that “we’re creating a generation of wallflower kids 

who are listening for an offence.”


Noting that the “context of language” was important, 

Akua told Hewitt-Clarkson her “energy is in the 

wrong place.”


Social media users were divided on the school’s emphasis

 on gender identity and inclusion with as many supporters

 defending the program as important as there were critics

 who called it unnecessary.


Describing it as “absolutely ridiculous”, one person, a p

rimary school teacher, tweeted, “Let kids be kids. They 

grow up too fast as it is.”


Another user, identifying herself as an academic, said 

Hewitt-Clarkson was right since “we do segment” 

others based on lessons learned early on.


A number of users suggested she stick to teaching 

students “reading, writing, arithmetic and also how 

to be kind” instead of “any of this other stuff.”


The majority of users agreed with the need to “phase 

out” some phrases like ‘man up’ and ‘grow a pair’ but 

called for “balance and some common sense”. Some

 also expressed concern about the long-term effects 

of the program.


But some denounced the program as evidence 

of “brainwashing” and “stifling freedom of 

speech” in schools, while others said the 

problem lay with the English language,

which doesn't use gender.


Tweeter: The problem is English Language. 

Only English and Turkish do not assign 
gendered pronoun & cases in discourse.
English denotes 
everything as Male with
satisfactory gender neutral alternatives,

Learning non-gendered language early is 

the best solution and avoids confusion


If you like this story, share it with a friend!




UN hits out at UK decision
cut family planning aid
£154 million to £23m

April 29th, 2:39pm (PressTV)



The UK faces criticism from a UN agency, over
government's decision to cut aid for family 

planning by 85 percent.


The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has 

launched a scathing attack on the UK’s decision
cut family planning aid from £154 million to 

£23m this year, warning that women and 

girls around the world, will suffer as

 a result.


The aid cut, which indicates a reduction by 85% 

could have helped prevent “250,000 maternal 

and child deaths.”


Prior to this decision, Britain was the biggest 

donor to the initiative, run by the UNFPA.


UNFPA provides contraception and maternal health 

medicine to millions of women in some of the world's

 poorest nations, as well as training maternal health 

staff and promoting efforts to prevent child 

marriage, unintended pregnancies and 

unsafe abortions.


Natalia Kanem, UNFPA executive director, accused 

Britain of “stepping away from its commitments at 

a time when inequalities are deepening and 

international solidarity is needed more 

than ever.”


She branded UK government’s decision as “devastating” 

& said that "with the now-withdrawn £130m, the UNFPA

 Supplies Partnership would have helped prevent around

 250,000 maternal and child deaths, 14.6 million

 unintended pregnancies and 4.3 million 

unsafe abortions.”


Kanem said the UN agency “deeply regrets” the UK’s 

decision, before adding that - upon slashing funds -

“women and girls suffer, especially the poor, those 

living in remote, underserved communities and 

those living through humanitarian crises.”


In response to a UN statement on Thursday, Liz Sugg, 

the former Foreign Office minister, who resigned in 

protest of the cuts, said that Britain's withdrawal 

of financial funding for the women's health 

organization was a "double hit on the 

world's poorest."


“This is money the UK committed to in the UN chamber, 

signed an agreement and now we’re walking away from 

it – it’s pretty unheard of," Sugg told the BBC Radio 4 

Today program on Thursday.


The UK declared this year that it would reduce its total 

foreign aid budget from 0.7 percent to 0.5 percent of 

national income, a £4 billion cut.


Meanwhile, Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said he did

 not recognize the figures, but admitted no area was

 immune to cuts.


The move has triggered an outcry from charities and aid

organizations that argue it will harm poor communities 

already reeling from COVID-19 and could also hamper

efforts to curb climate change.


UKAid has long been a cover for the government’s foreign

policy deployment in the poorer countries and its drastic

aid cuts happen, even as the British military and 

intelligence services step up their activities in

the subject countries.


The UK’s retreatment from its financial commitments 

comes after other world powers’ increase their aid 

spending to the poorest, because their need is 

increasing, given the global health crisis.


UK: Domestic Abuse Victims 

‘Forced to Sell Homes or Rack

 Up Debt to Get Justice’

April 28th 5:08pm (FNA)

Domestic abuse victims who can’t get legal aid

 are being forced to sell their homes or rack up 

debts, to bring perpetrators to justice,

 campaigners warned.


New legislation introduced in January eradicated 

the cap -- previously used -- when determining 

eligibility, but charities say domestic abuse 

survivors are still being refused help, due 

to owning their home, The Independent 



Experts say victims who cannot afford legal representation 

are being forced to face their abusive former partners 

alone in court, due to the changes not being
rolled out.


The warning flies in the face of a December 2020 High Court 

ruling that stopped a legal loophole that blocked a domestic 

abuse survivor who was a single mother from obtaining 

legal aid, despite her only having £28 in her bank 

account. Legal aid helps people pay for legal 

advice and representation in court.


Lola, a domestic abuse survivor, said she reapplied for legal 

aid twice after learning the law had changed but has been

 rejected both times, due to owning her home.


The 36-year-old, who is unemployed and struggling for money, 

added, “I was also rejected before the law change. I meet all 

the criteria, except for the fact I own my house."


“They asked: ‘Why haven’t you got a loan out? and ‘Why haven’t

 you asked friends and family?’ The process is re-traumatising.

 But my ex has got full legal aid," she added.


“He manipulated a professional by saying he had suffered 

domestic abuse from me and got them to write this down 

in a letter, which he then used to apply for legal aid. You 

don’t need any proof for this. He’s taking me to court 

for nothing,” she said.


Lola, who has had two restraining orders against her ex-

partner, said she qualifies for free school meal vouchers.


“I have to represent myself alone in court,” she said, adding, 

“I’m not legally trained. It's the most triggering, traumatising

 experience. He has a barrister. They talk to me like I’m the 

lowest form of humanity. Like I’m scum. He’s got an 

endless pit of my money to keep taking me to 

court. It’s like I’m his plaything.”


Lola criticised the legal aid agency which gave her ex money 

for not even checking if there were legal proceedings or a 

restraining order against him - adding it should be 

standard practice.


She warned the “injustice” of the situation was “so huge” it 

means she is “consumed by anger” every day, and warned

an individual as dangerous as her ex-partner, who refuses 

to pay child maintenance, should not be granted “all that 

power” in the courts.


Lola, who is being supported by domestic abuse charity 

Women’s Aid, recalled the abuse suffered during her



“It was never physical,” she said, adding, “But it was getting 

to that point. It was emotional and financial abuse. He 

starting reading up on conspiracy theories and 

taking an interest in flat earth theories. He 

completely lost his grip on reality.”


Lola said he would regularly scream at her in front of their son 

for trivial issues such as leaving lights on and constantly 

ringing her when she was at home due to his 

“possessive nature”.


She said her son is keen to do school activities but she has 

had to request grants from charities to afford them — 

adding she is terrified she won’t be able to “afford 

to let him pursue his passions”. Money set aside

 for her son’s future is being spent on solicitors 

and barristers, she said.


“I’m in a horror film,” Lola said, adding, “This man has got all 

his support. He is hunting me down. I’m going from room to 

room and there is no escape. He was bad enough but now

 the legal aid is abetting him to do this to me.”


Refuge found 1,780 women seeking help – more than a third of 

the total – had faced economic abuse from their partner. On 

average, the mistreatment, which includes being denied 

access to money or a bank account, as well as having 

debt placed in their name, lasted more than six years.


Charlotte Proudman, a family law barrister, told The Independent 

she had referred domestic abuse survivors to solicitors since

 the changes were in introduced but they had nevertheless 

not been eligible for legal aid.


Dr Proudman added, “Solicitors have said it hasn't come into 

force. On the ground, it is not happening. The legal aid 

agency might be refusing because they own 

properties, which defies logic and law."


“There is one woman in particular, who because she owns half 

of the family home, they have said she is not eligible for legal 

aid even though she is on benefits. She is a domestic abuse 

victim. It is awful," Dr Proudman said.


“If victims haven't got any money to seek protection through 

courts, it leaves them in a vulnerable situation, unable to 

escape abusive partners and seek court protection. 

Such as, orders which block the abusers 

contacting them or approaching them 

in person,” she said.


Dr Proudman warned women who are not legally trained do 

not know how to “navigate” the legal system - with victims 

of domestic abuse being particularly scared to face their 

abuser in court alone.


“It is a process of them being re-traumatised without the 

protection of a lawyer to speak on their behalf,” she said, 

adding, “An abuser can continue abuse by taking them 

back to court as a way of continuing harassment and

 stalking them.”


Legal aid for domestic abuse victims needs to be non-means

 tested and universally available for all irrespective of their

 finances with no delays, she added.


“Sometimes it can take weeks to get a legal aid agency to 

decide if they are going to get funding,” Proudman said, 

adding, “In that time serious physical or psychological 

harm could have been caused.”


Olive Craig, senior legal officer at Rights of Women, a 

leading women’s legal rights charity, told The 

Independent recent changes to legal aid are 

“applied inconsistently and do not go far 

enough to address the many problems

 presented by the legal aid means test”.


She added, “We expect the government’s long overdue review 

of the means test to address those deficiencies and ensure 

access to justice for all.”


While Lucy Hadley, of Women's Aid, said they have been 

“disappointed” to learn domestic abuse victims who 

own their own homes are still being blocked from 

getting legal aid, in spite of the High Court’s

 key ruling.


She demanded the legal aid means test to be completely 

axed for domestic abuse survivors to make sure “no 

woman who needs to access legal advice and 

representation when escaping an abuser 

is barred from justice“.


The Home Office has been contacted for comment.




UK breakup? Welsh

 more popular
than ever

April 8th, 8:56pm  (Press TV)


New polls suggest that support for Welsh independence 

from the UK is at an all time high. This has created fear 

in Downing Street, over the real threat of a Kingdom 

breakup, with the Welsh parliament elections on 

the way. 


The idea of a Welsh breakaway from the United 

Kingdom is high on the agenda, ahead of this 

year's Welsh elections.


With the country’s biggest pro-independence party 

Plaid Cymru, pledging to secure a vote on Welsh 

independence within the next five years.


The idea of Wales going alone has traditionally been 

an obscure viewpoint, however, since Brexit, public 

support for an independence vote has skyrocketed.


One poll conducted this year actually suggested that 

Welsh support for independence, could be as high 

as 39 percent, that would be the highest level 

ever recorded.


No.10 has reportedly become very aware of the growing 

anti-Westminster sentiment outside of England, and are

 drawing up plans to counter the trend.


The Welsh elections are taking place in May. Plaid Cymru 

have been recording great successes in past votes, and

 hopes are high of major gains.


Although support for independence is not yet near a 

majority view, Westminster’s poor handling of the 

coronavirus crisis, and the negative effects 

Brexit has had for Wales, appears to have 

created greater belief in the virtues of 

self-government. With Scotland also 

pushing hard for a UK divorce... 

No.10’s concerns are growing

 as fast as Welsh patriotism.





Hello darkness my old friend
...Peter Mandelson is back 

advising Labour, why not 

just go the whole hog & 
bring back Tony Blair?

by Chris Sweeney

February 15th (RT)


Chris Sweeney is an author and columnist who has written 

for newspapers such as The Times, Daily Express, The 

Sun and Daily Record, along with several international-

selling magazines. Follow him on Twitter



Keir Starmer is so devoid of original ideas he is bringing back 

the Prince of Darkness to help him crowbar his way into 

Number 10, but if the plan is Blair 2.0, why settle for an 

impersonator when the original is still available?


Lord Peter Mandelson is not a name that will resonate beyond

 the UK, but he is one of Britain’s most infamous spin doctors. 

The type of character who has seemingly exerted an extended

 sphere of influence without it ever being clear exactly what he 

does. He arrived into the Labour Party in 1985 and it’s now 

been revealed he is still pulling strings today, 36 years later.


Tony Blair adored his style but some of the left-wing union 

devotees had no time for the man who became known as 

‘The Prince of Darkness’. So, to appease them, and to 

keep his involvement in Blair’s leadership campaign 

secret, he was issued a code name – 'Bobby'. 


Since then, he’s inhabited a range of roles; minister without 

portfolio, secretary of state for Northern Ireland, European

 commissioner, business secretary --- and then Baron 

Mandelson as he entered the House of Lords. After 

Blair left - and was replaced by Gordon Brown - 

Mandelson retained an iron-grip on the levers 

of power. In that period, he was a member of 

35 cabinet committees, and some referred 

to him as the “unelected prime minister.”


Mandelson likes a frontman, a lead singer to shield him while 

he writes the lyrics. So it’s business as usual now that’s he 

back in alongside current Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer. 

There is only a decade or so in age between the two, but

 the level of experience in the dark arts of politics, is 

heavily tipped in Mandelson’s favour. The notoriety

 is why he chooses to remain in the shadows, as a 

lot of voters detest him. He represents the back-

room dealmaking and media manipulation that

 turns so many off politics.


Mandelson is like a lightning rod, he takes the surge and 

allows his ‘stooge’ to carry on. He ended up in the public 

court of shame, for spending a New Year’s Eve, on Paul 

Allen’s yacht, while Microsoft was at the centre of an 

EU investigation.


Another yacht trip got him in hot water, this time,
oligarch Oleg Deripaska, as Mandelson had
part of a decision to cut aluminium tariffs.
At the 
time, Deripaska owned United Company
one of the world’s biggest producers of
the metal.


Mandelson was also friendly with Jeffery Epstein,

 and has been pictured with the disgraced financier. 


So for Keir Starmer to bring in a man with that amount of 

baggage, proves how desperate he must be. Starmer 

replaced Jeremy Corbyn - the most socialist main-

stream figure seen in British politics for decades - 

but has as yet done nothing of substance. He's a 

more centrist figure, but Boris has that sewn up:

 he won the last election, with an affirming 80-

seat majority. The so-called Red Wall, fell to 

the Conservatives, proving that the working 

class heartlands, no longer had faith in 

their old ally Labour. And still there’s 

no spark or idea from Labour, to 

turn that around.


Since Blair left office, the party hasn’t won an election. Their

 last victory was in 2005 and before Blair led them to victory

 in 1997 they hadn’t won an election since 1974. Blair is the 

only person who has led the Labour Party to victory in the 

last 47 years, and it seems they’ve simply decided to 

revert to what worked then and hope it does now.


So welcome back Mandelson, who is right in his sweet spot, 

without an official position but is there to “broaden the party’s

 appeal.” It seems a redundant mission, as you’re asking 

Mandelson to recreate the old magic. For that, he needs 

his protege and the man who brought those ideas to life

 – Blair. Why bother trying to copy him, when he is still 

out there, sitting around not doing very much? Blair 

has been quite vocal and made quite a few public 

interjections into the Covid-19 effort. It was his 

idea to stagger the two vaccine doses, which 

Britain and other countries are now 

actually doing. 


If Labour's desperation is so great they need to face facts. 

Starmer is keen to paint himself as a paragon of the good 

and just. He created a big spectacle over the investigation

 into anti-Semitism within Labour and also fired a member 

of his shadow cabinet for making a remark that was

 judged to slight the Jewish faith.  


Starmer’s previous profession was as a barrister where he 

worked on human rights cases before becoming a QC and 

the Director of Public Prosecutions. He also spoke out 

and protested against the Iraq war. 


Yes, the same war that Blair led Britain into, after years of 

working with Mandelson. So if Starmer is so willing to 

embrace Mandelson, is he really as principled and 

motivated by integrity as he’d like to have us think?


All of this also reflects an extremely depressing facet to 

British politics. The country has suffered the most 

deaths in Europe due to incompetent leadership.


The list of ludicrous decisions has been recounted many

 times and if the opposition cannot muster up a feasible 

counter after all these months, they really are 

beyond hope.


The vaccination rollout is the only thing Boris has handled 

well, but it won’t erase the number of families left to rue the 

unnecessary loss of loved ones. There is also the much-

covered resurgence in support for independence in 

Scotland and a growing movement in Wales. Brexit 

was another shambles, with a deal agreed days 

before everything went into meltdown. How is it 

possible that an allegedly well-run, professional, 

perceptive political party ,can’t muster up a 

credible opposition?


Winding the clock back 20 years and hoping that the same 

things will work is, in my view, a fantasy. Society and 

attitudes have changed, there was no social media 

in 1997 and simply looking plausible and playing

 'Things Can Only Get Better' on a loop isn’t 

going to win you 80+ seats. But let us 

suppose, for a minute, that it might, 

if the Labour party & it’s leadership 

really believe that’s their greatest 

hope and the best plan they have 

for the British people is New 

Labour 2.0, then why isn’t 

Blair involved?


Starmer talks a bit like him, has a similar presence, they were 

even both barristers before entering politics, but trying to 

‘out Blair’ Blair is futile. If Starmer isn't able to lead and 

create his own vision, then why did he put himself
for the job? Trying to get Peter Mandelson to 

Svengali you into some sort of Blair tribute act
is never going to work. As Queen fans
Adam Lambert, is no substitute for 

Freddie Mercury.


Step up or step aside, don’t be a down-
copy of your predecessor.


Think your friends would be interested? 


Share this story!




Boris Defends Bully Patel
but Not Pensioners –
Govt is Morally Repugnant

by Tommy Sheridan

22/11/2020  (Source - Sputnik)

Anyone surprised by BoJo’s decision to condone shameful bullying at

 the heart of his government and order a “square” of defence be formed

 “around the prittster” after he decided to keep Priti Patel in his cabinet

 despite her being found guilty of breaching the Ministerial Code and

 bullying, has plainly been sleeping over the past eleven months.

That period has exposed the rancid hypocrisy, corruption, cronyism, 

and lack of integrity which characterises Johnson and the Tories 

under his leadership.

Priti Patel was accused of disgraceful conduct and bullying while an 

employment Minister under Theresa May in 2015, behaviour which 

drove a female civil servant to attempt suicide on at least two 

occasions and ended with a Department of Work & Pensions

 pay-out of £25,000 in April 2017 to avoid the scrutiny of an 

Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal, harassment, 

discrimination, and victimisation.

Patel the Bully Became Patel the Liar

Patel was then moved to the role of International Secretary only to be

 found out as a devious liar whom May had to sack after her deliberate

 misleading of the PM and Parliament over secret meetings with Israeli 

officials, business representatives and lobbyists was exposed. She

 lied and was caught. She had to go.

Being a dishonest bully presented no barrier to Boris Johnson’s 

cabinet however and he appointed Patel as his Home Secretary 

in July 2019 after he became Tory leader.

Within weeks the top civil servant in the Home Office, Sir Philip Rutnam, 

felt compelled to warn her about her conduct and lack of respect for 

staff before eventually resigning from his post at the end of February

 this year in a move which caused shock waves in the civil service 

and government. He accused Patel of lying about a “vicious” 

campaign orchestrated against him and creating a climate 

of fear in her department.

Patel Investigation Handicapped from the Outset

A high-level investigation was reluctantly ordered into the allegations

 made by Rutnam, and he vowed to pursue a constructive dismissal 

claim against the government which is yet to be concluded. It is 

increasingly clear that the investigation has been less than 

rigorous as the senior civil servant appointed to conduct 

it was refused access to Rutnman despite him being the 

best equipped to inform the investigation. 

However the report that was compiled was laid on Johnson’s desk 

in April and he refused to act on it for months before recently 

contacting the author, Sir Alex Allan, and leaning on him to 

water down the conclusions. Despite the limited access to 

witnesses the investigation still found Priti Patel "shouted 

and swore" at staff in actions "that can be described 

as bullying" and that she had indeed breached the 

Ministerial Code which is normally an automatic 

resignation offence.

The fact Sir Alex Allan, former chair of the prestigious Joint 

Intelligence Committee, chose to resign rather than alter his

 report to save Patel’s reputation is admirable, but the full 

report is being kept secret. It must be revealed in full and 

the fact it was severely handicapped by the barring of 

access to Rutman’s input must also be highlighted.

Johnson Willing to Protect Patel
but not Pensioners in Care Homes

Patel was ordered to issue an apology on camera on Friday but all

 it did was rub salt in the wounds of the campaign against bullying

 as she smugly smirked and smiled when she claimed to have no

 knowledge of bullying but apologised anyway. Please watch and

 remember - her conduct drove a lowly paid civil servant to 

attempt suicide on two occasions and compelled a very 

senior civil servant to resign. The lack of contrition for 

her actions and empathy for her victims is truly


If Johnson and his Tory gang of millionaires and spivs showed an iota 

of the concern and commitment to defend elderly care residents as

they have shown to defend lying bully Patel at least 20,000 lives 

could have been saved. A shocking report compiled by Amnesty

 International last month received very little media attention but 

condemned the Tory Covid19 response as a dereliction of duty 

and care towards elderly citizens.

Read the document and understand just how complicit this Tory

 government is in the deaths of thousands of senior citizens. It 

presents evidence that the government’s policy of herd immunity

 was responsible for mass murder. The government was entirely 

aware of the probable outcome of their policy and went ahead

 regardless of the risk to thousands of lives.

The report, “As if expendable: The UK government’s failure to protect 

older people in care homes during the Covid-19 pandemic”, details 

how, between March 2 and June 12, 18,562 residents of care homes

 in England died with COVID-19. The vast majority (18,168) were 

aged 65 and over, representing almost 40 percent of all deaths 

involving the virus in England during this time frame. Of these, 

76 percent (13,844 deaths) occurred within care homes for

 the elderly.

During this brief period, 28,186 “excess deaths” were recorded

 in English care homes, a 46 percent increase in comparison 

with the same period over previous years.

Amnesty conclude that the Tory government together with its 

agencies at national and local level have “taken decisions and 

adopted policies during the Covid-19 pandemic that have directly

 violated the human rights of older residents of care homes in

 England—notably their right to life, their right to health, and 

their right to non-discrimination”.

The report argues that the decisions and policies of the Tory

 government “impacted the rights of care home residents to 

private and family life, and may have violated their right not 

to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment”.

Johnson was determined to “form a square around the prittster”

 to defend his lying bully Patel at the Home Office but didn’t lift a 

finger to defend thousands of pensioners in care homes. That is

 the warped and putrid priorities which define this government.

A Litany of Government Failures but No Resignations

Their top advisor broke lockdown rules but there was no resignation.

They have been caught awarding contracts worth over £20 billion of 

public money without proper scrutiny or tendering processes to

 friends of senior Tories and companies known to donate to the 

Tory party and no one has resigned.

The UK government’s late response to Covid-19 and failure to 

impose lockdown measures caused the unnecessary deaths 

of 20,000 --- but no one resigned from government.

International law will be broken because of the government’s

 Internal Market Bill --- but no one resigns.

The Johnson government backs bullies, liars, public contract 

cheats and international law breaking. It is morally repugnant 

and thoroughly incompetent. No wonder Scotland is so keen 

to break away as soon as possible.


Report: Patients Discharged from 

UK Hospitals without COVID Test

October 28th, 2020 (FNA)

Almost half of hospital patients have been discharged 

without receiving the results of their coronavirus test 

– including some patients who were sent to care 

homes, new research revealed.

Independent national patient body Healthwatch England 

said it had learned many patients were discharged from 

hospitals between March and August this year without 

proper assessments with many vulnerable people sent 

home without medication, equipment or the care they 

needed, The Independent reported.

At the start of the pandemic thousands of patients were 

discharged to care homes as NHS England instructed 

hospitals to free up 15,000 beds ahead of the first 

wave of coronavirus.

Approximately 25,000 patients were sent to care homes 

with some not tested, sparking fears this helped seed 

care homes with the virus. There have been around 

16,000 care home deaths linked to COVID-19.

According to a survey of almost 600 discharged patients 

and interviews with 60 NHS staff, Healthwatch England 

said it had found serious flaws with the way hospitals 

had followed NHS England’s instructions.

In joint research with the British Red Cross, shared with 

The Independent, it found that 44 percent of patients were 

discharged without knowing the result of their corona-

virus test - including some to care homes.

It said, “Despite the policy stating that all patients 

discharged to a care home should be tested for 

COVID-19, we found that 26 percent of our 

survey respondents who were discharged 

to a care home were not tested.”

While the numbers involved were small, only 13 out of 50 

patients, the report added that this was “still a significant 

proportion of people who were required to be tested 

but did not receive one”.

Healthwatch added that while patients going to care homes 

must have the results available and shared with the home

it was still not national policy to test everyone being 

discharged. It argued this should now be an 

''ambition'' for the government.

Its report also raises concerns about the wider care 

of vulnerable patients sent home from hospital.

88 percent of patients reported having care needs 

after being discharged that have still not been met.  

82 per cent did not receive a visit or any

assessment from a health professional

Almost one in five of those who did not 

receive a visit, reported unmet needs.

In total 45 percent of people with a disability and 

20 percent of people with a long-term condition 

had support needs that were not being met, 

following their discharge.  

Healthwatch England criticised the national discharge 

policy put in place by NHS bosses, as “confusing” in 

places which it said may have contributed to some 

patients missing out on the care they needed.

Robert Francis QC, chair of Healthwatch England, said, 

“In March, hospitals were asked to discharge patients 

with little or no notice and the speed with which this 

took place was important, but led to mistakes."

“We do not want to detract from the heroic efforts of
hose on the frontline, who often put themselves at 

great risk to care for their patients, but services 

and system leaders have now had more time 

to prepare," he said.

“It’s essential that we learn from what people have 

shared with us about the impact that a poorly 

handled discharge can have on them and 

their loved ones. Taking action now will 

not only reduce the risk to patients but 

will also help improve the way people 

leave hospital in the future,” he added.

The British Red Cross and Healthwatch England said 

assessments for patients needed to be prioritised.

They also called for discharge checklists to make 

sure patients were asked if they needed help with 

transport and equipment.

Other recommendations included making sure carers 

and patients had a single contact for support, which 

was already national policy but still not fully adopted.

The report also said community services needed 

to be boosted, to cope with increased demands.

British Red Cross Chief Executive Mike Adamson said, 

“We’ve seen first-hand the huge efforts made to 

improve the discharge process for patients and 

their families. However, we also know, despite 

good intentions and hard work, there are still 

barriers to making the ideals of discharge 

policy a reality."

“The Red Cross has been bearing witness to these 

issues for years, and we hope that the increased 

urgency of the situation will bring lasting change. 

Many of the people we support are older or more 

vulnerable, & fall into the higher-risk categories

 for COVID-19," Adamson said.

“Simple interventions, like getting equipment and 

medicine delivered, or follow-up visits, can make 

the difference between a good recovery or some-

one regressing to the point of readmission - 

precisely at the time we want people to 

stay well, and stay at home,” he said.

Professor Stephen Powis, NHS national medical director, 

said, “There has long been a wide consensus about the 

benefits for patients of being able to return home as 

soon as their specialist hospital care is complete, 

and it is good that delays have been reduced in 

recent times. While this is a very small snap-

shot survey, local hospitals will want* (sic) 

to take account of the points it makes.”

 (*No they won't!)



By backing housing charity’s
‘Jewish only’ rule, 
UK court drops
the ball. Aren’t we all equal in Britain?

by Chris Sweeney October 17th, 2020 (Source: RT)

A small legal challenge has turned into a precedent-

setting case about whether someone in today’s 

Britain can be prioritised or denied housing on 

the basis of their religion.The law isn’t always 

right and it’s not just people who can be 

taken hostage.

In a disgraceful decision deemed legitimate by the UK’s

 highest court, a single mother with four children was 

refused social housing – because she wasn’t a Jew.

It’s that simple. 

The charity Agudas Israel Housing Association (AIHA) 

owns 470 houses in the London borough of Hackney.

 Local authorities promised, in October 2017, the 

next available home to the woman and her kids, 

two of whom are autistic.

AIHA refused to hand over the keys to any 

of its SIX four-bedroom, unoccupied flats.

Their argument was it makes offers “only to members 

of the Orthodox Jewish community.” As Britain is a 

secular nation, the woman’s legal team found this 

claim astonishing and argued it had the same 

sentiment as the ‘No Dogs, No Blacks, No Irish’ 

signs that were once displayed in some pubs. 

Lord Sales stated the charity’s use of positive discrimination 

was lawful, under the Equality Act 2010, in order to correct 

the disadvantage faced by the community. The issue 

apparently was not racism, but discrimination on 

the grounds of religious observance. The court 

considered the “widespread and increasing 

overt antisemitism in our society.”

Intolerance or hate speech of any form is unacceptable. 

But it’s hard to believe the courts and public reaction 

would have been the same, if this had been Islam or 

a group of Pashtuns from the Iranian border region.

Jewish affairs are treated differently. There's a 'kid gloves' 

approach and they’re deemed to be culturally valuable, 

while other communities are sometimes dismissed as 

interlopers. AIHA’s founder Ita Cymerman-Symons, 

speaking last year about the legal action, offered 

the view: “Which non-Jewish person, honestly 

speaking, wants to live in the midst of a 

building full of Haredi men with all the 

beards, and all the chanting on a 

Friday night and all the children?”

A homeless single mother with four children 

for one, along with many others.

Plenty of people in social housing endure noisy neighbours, 

potent cooking smells and screaming kids. But isn’t that 

wonderful? Diversity and living cheek by jowl with 

people who see, think and believe different
to you.

That’s a rich learning experience for anyone.

The fallacy of the AIHA’s superiority complex of viewing 

Orthodox Jews above others is, every public service is 

available to their members. And, of the charity’s 2019 

income of £105,710, the sum of £39,716 came from 

British government grants. They won’t be stone-

walled at hospital or refused entry on a bus, so 

why should they be allowed to create their 

small-minded kingdom with impunity?

These Jewish community leaders seem to be shutting out 

anyone who doesn’t align with their beliefs. It’s unhealthy 

and depressing, especially in a multicultural metropolis 

like London.

The judgement also referenced issues that Orthodox Jews 

don’t like to live outside of the Stamford Hill area and they 

tend to be poorer than the wider Jewish community. Many 

of us would prefer not to live outside of the millionaire’s 

playgrounds of Kensington, Knightsbridge and Mayfair – 

but we tend to be poorer, so can’t afford it. That doesn’t 

mean the courts would support us founding the 

Republic of Poverty Housing Association, and 

letting us administer who can move in.

Even if we concede that Orthodox Jews appear to support 

AIHA’s ghetto-isation, aren’t the courts supposed to rule 

for the greater good? It makes no sense to encourage 

people to live in self-imposed enclaves. How are they 

going to progress in life, or do they never plan to 

leave the streets around their homes?

There’s also a wider impact of the judgement. It raises the 

hackles of the population. It hacks away at the concept of 

respecting every other citizen. The far-right will jump on 

this and sadly there’s no defence. It will birth more 

discontentment and raise tensions. 

The law lords have dropped the ball, because they are the 

highest court in the land, they had the chance to set a 

precedent. They seem to have been influenced by 

Jewish sensitivity, that labels anyone who 

disagrees with the faith an anti-Semite.

 It’s hard to see how justice, fairness, 

compassion and understanding are 

applicable. But superiority, tokenism 

and favouritism have been advanced.


Well one of the court’s final points was AIHA was "a small 

housing provider, but similar discrimination by a larger one 

might not be allowed.”

We’re all equal, right?

Chris Sweeney is an author and columnist who has 

written for newspapers such as The Times, Daily 

Express, The Sun and Daily Record, along with 

several international-selling magazines. Follow 

him on Twitter @Writes_Sweeney


Brits should be ashamed of the casual cruelty 

we show towards over-60s, and shrugging it 

off as ‘banter’, does nothing to excuse it.

by Damian Wilson

9th October, 2020

Two-thirds of UK over-60s say they have been abused in 

public because of their age, with a fifth saying insults 

come from within their own families. It seems the 

idea that we should ‘respect our elders’, is no 

longer in fashion.

We live in a society where everyone just loves to talk 

about ‘respect.’  Even primary school children are 

indoctrinated with the concept, told they are due 

it by right and can demand it from others, if it’s 

not forthcoming. It’s all one-way traffic.

That’s why, as they grow older, and insist on enforcing 

their entitlement, it becomes increasingly evident that 

while they assume that right is a given for them, they 

actually don’t give a toss about it applying to 

anyone else.

Every now and then, research will put this into sharp relief, 

as is shown in the results of a survey undertaken by the 

University of the Third Age (u3a). The study found that 

the more senior members of society, basically those 

aged 60 and over, are frequently insulted by younger 

people, and they don’t like it.

Clueless Millennials, Zoomers and even Gen X’ers told the 

u3a pollsters that they don’t mean anything by slinging 

ageist insults, they were simply being “friendly” and 

the name-calling was just “banter.” Everyone 

does it.

The growing tendency of young people to airily dismiss their 

elders as over the hill old fogeys, and to even insult them in 

public because of their age, is not ‘banter,’ it’s insulting 

and rude.

The misuse of ‘bants’ as a term is one of modern life’s 

great irritations, because while young people have 

co-opted the word to (mis)represent the sort of 

behaviour that borders on bullying, with a thin 

coating of vicious humour, they are 

deeply mistaken.

Banter, in its traditional form, is an exchange between 

two people, a battle of wits, a game of intellectual 

ping-pong, like those nerdy folk on Channel 4 panel 

shows. Usually, those engaging in banter finish 

their jousting with a smug, self-congratulatory 

smile. It’s showing off, it’s proving how clever

you are. It’s not calling someone an old fart 

and shoving them out of the way.

Where’s the give and take, or clever verbal sparring, in 

a teenager shouting at an elderly woman in the street, 

“You dozy old biddy, move it!”. Or standing behind a 

chap of a certain age at a shop checkout, as he 

searches for his wallet and complaining,
grandpa, hurry up!”?

That’s not banter. That’s something completely different. 

A new sort of passive-aggressive behaviour combined 

with name-calling, is increasingly common among 

young Brits these days, thinking that getting one 

over another person is some sort of achievement 

proving their superiority, particularly if it
their victim as a result.

Of those surveyed, 63 per cent of over 60s said they 

had been verbally abused in public, with an ageist 

insult, while others had also noticed an increase 

in insults on television (65 per cent) social media

(33 per cent) and even from their own family 

(21 per cent).

My 11-year-old  thinks it’s funny to call me a ”boomer” 

when I can’t find the TV remote. She has a very clear 

idea of what the insult suggests, even if she’s 

actually out of range by a few years. I’m 56 -- 

so borderline Gen X’er, thank you very much.

Unfortunately for me, British families in general 

are not the sort of multi-generational dynasties, 

such as in Italy or India,  in which patriarchs 

& matriarchs, are given lifelong roles at the 

head of their family and afforded a respect 

that other members ignore at their peril.

Break the rules in one of these families, cause offence 

to an elder, and you will bring down the wrath of 

generations upon your head, face humiliation 

and even ostracisation. There is a sense of 

honour woven into the fabric of the family. 

These families are, sadly, not common 

amongst the British.

So most kids and young adults have no hesitation 

in freely hurling abuse at someone they consider 

a geriatric, past it, a fuddy duddy, over the hill, a 

fogey, a crone, an old dear, a codger, a biddy or 

a fossil, which by the way, are those insults 

most frequently employed, according to u3a.

This sort of casual cruelty, and the disregard 

it displays towards our seniors, is hugely 

disrespectful & we should be ashamed 

that it’s so widely accepted as nothing 

out of the ordinary.

We’re all guilty here. Causing offence like this should 

provoke more concern than it does, because it is an 

unwelcome sign of a breakdown in social and family 

hierarchies. Ignoring the concepts of seniority and 

wisdom --- we treat human beings like any other 

consumable, in our consumer-driven world ---

with a finite shelf-life & built-in obsolescence.

Many people feel no qualms about calling out an older 

person, in public, to remind them their time is up as a 

useful contributor to society and they need to shift 

it or risk being steamrolled by those behind them. 

While maybe not articulated quite like that as a 

traffic queue forms behind an elderly motorist 

showing excessive caution at a road junction, 

that, sadly, is often the underlying sentiment 

and we should be ashamed.

But most often, we’re not. We’re just annoyed at 

the inconvenience that someone older than us,

is causing to ourselves. Nearly 10 years ago, 

Age UK made a study of ageism & identified

it as the most widely experienced form of 

discrimination across Europe, affecting 

164 million senior citizens at that time.

Nothing much has changed in the UK in this regard 

since 2011, it seems. And if the latest study is 

anything to go by, things have become 

even worse. 

Damian Wilson is a UK journalist, ex-Fleet Street 

editor, financial industry consultant and political 

communications special advisor in the UK & EU.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in 

this column are solely those of the author and do 

not necessarily represent those of RT.


 Figures Reveal 17,000 Elderly People in UK 

Forced to Sell Home to Pay for Care Costs 

in Just One Year

October 5th, 2020 (Fars news agency)

More than 17,000 pensioners were forced to sell their homes 

to pay for social care last year, research by Money Mail reveals.

The shocking figure means that 330 elderly residents each 

week are taking the desperate step despite Prime Minister 

Boris Johnson’s promise to fix the social care funding crisis.

The calculations reveal the scale of the emergency, showing 

that the numbers forced to sell their hard-won homes have 

soared 45 percent since 2000.

Last night campaigners called for urgent action and 

demanded a "national fund" to pay for social care.

Morgan Vine, of charity Independent Age, said, "The 

pandemic is not a reason not to act – it is the reason 

why action has never been more vital."

On his first day in No 10 in July 2019, Johnson vowed to 

make social care a priority and end the crisis "once and 

for all".

But he has since admitted action would be delayed and 

the coronavirus crisis has made immediate reform a 

remote possibility.

The cost of residential care has risen dramatically 

and now stands at more than £33,000 a year.

Anyone with more than £23,250 in funds, including their 

house value, is denied state help, leaving thousands 

having to sell their homes to pay soaring care bills.

The Daily Mail has campaigned to end this injustice 

for the families of those with dementia, as well as 

other patients.

MoneyMail’s calculations, verified by Independent Age, 

are based on Department of Health data indicating that 

30 percent of those who pay for their residential care 

have to sell their homes.

The total was produced by comparing the numbers of 

self-funders in care provided by analysts Laing Buisson.

The research assumes the average stay is two-and-a-half 

years, as concluded in a study by the Personal Social 

Services Research Unit and Bupa.

It means around 350,000 elderly people are estimated to 

have sold their homes to pay for residential care since 1999.

Caroline Abrahams, director at charity Age UK, said, "When 

the threat from coronavirus finally recedes, Age UK will 

certainly be holding the Government to account on its 

promise to fix social care. The obvious solution is for 

us all to pay into a national fund, like we do with 

the NHS."

She added" |Most people dread the idea of having to sell 

the family home to pay their care bills and the fact that 

this is the reality for substantial numbers is very sad."

Vine, head of policy at Independent Age, said, "These latest 

figures are a timely reminder of the need to fix the funding 

crisis that has plagued the social care system for decades, 

long before COVID-19.

"When taking office, the Prime Minister promised to solve 

the crisis, including preventing people from having to sell 

their homes to pay for care," Vine said, adding, ‘Although 

he couldn’t have predicted the challenges we now face, 

we can all predict the long-term consequences of failing 

to keep his promise."

Liz Kendall, Labour’s social care spokesman, said, "The 

Prime Minister said, on the steps to Downing Street, that 

he has a plan to fix the crisis in social care and that no 

one should have to sell their homes to pay for their care."

"Yet we have seen neither sight nor sound of 

any long-term plan for reform," Kendall said.

"This must be an absolute top priority for the Government. 

People who have worked hard and saved all their life have 

seen their savings wiped out," Kendall added.

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said, 

"We have committed to end the injustice that some people

have to sell their homes to finance care whilst others don’t. 

We know there is a need for a long-term solution and are 

looking at proposals."


UK’s chief scientific adviser has
 of shares in vaccine
maker contracted by govt
– reports


UK Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance reportedly 

holds a bonus of tens of thousands of shares in a pharma 

giant developing a Covid-19 vaccine for the government. 

Yet, London says there is no conflict of interest.

Vallance, who also chairs the government’s expert advisory 

panel on vaccines, appears to have retained over 43,000 

shares in GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) – a UK-based 

multinational pharmaceutical company – 

worth £600,000, The Telegraph reports.

The shareholding appears to be the legacy of his previous 

job as the head of research and development at the very 

same company. Over his tenure from 2012 to 2018, 

Vallance accumulated a total of 404,201 GSK 

shares worth a whopping £6.1 million in his 

hands, according to the British media.

However, he sold more than £5 million worth of shares 

after being appointed to the government. GSK, mean-

while, has entered the global race to provide the world 

with a vaccine against coronavirus – alongside some 

20 other drug manufacturers and research centres. 

The endeavour might prove quite lucrative, should 

the company succeed.

The pharma giant working together with another drug 

manufacturer – Sanofi – has already struck deals with 

the UK and the US governments to supply them with 

a Covid-19 vaccine in case its efforts are fruitful. 

The contract would see GSK providing as many 

as 60 million doses to the UK and 100 million 

doses to the US. Washington has already 

reportedly paid the two companies 

£1.65 million to accelerate 

their efforts.

Since it received the government contracts, GSK’s 

share price rose by some two percent. Vallance 

has meanwhile been busy ensuring that the UK 

would get enough vaccine doses - if GSK is 

successful and contributing to the vaccine 

development efforts.

Earlier this week, he said that the first doses could 

be ready as early as by the end of this year, 

warning, however, that the first half of 2021

 would be a more realistic prospect.The 

revelations sparked suspicions of a 

potential conflict of interest.

However, Health Secretary Matt Hancock denied the 

possibility of this. “No, there are rules around these 

kinds of things and I'm sure that Sir Patrick has 

been fully advised by them,” he told LBC Radio. 

“If you know Sir Patrick Vallance as I do, any 

suggestion that he is doing anything other 

than his level best to try and tackle this 

virus is wrong,” he added.

A government spokesman confirmed that Vallance holds 

a deferred share bonus that would mature in April 2021 

without revealing its exact value. The spokesman also 

said that “appropriate steps were taken to manage the 

government chief scientific adviser’s (GCSA) interests 

in line with advice provided at the time.”

He added that the chief scientific adviser also has “no input”

 into the commercial decisions on vaccine procurement, 

which are taken by the government following a “robust” 

approval regime.

The developments come as the UK braces for a second wave 

of coronavirus. The number of new cases is on the rise once 

again and some places in the UK witness it increasing at a 

pace not seen since the peak of the epidemic in spring.

More than 6,100 people were confirmed to have contracted 

the disease overnight and Hancock said that up to 10,000 

people might get ill a day. The situation prompted London 

to introduce a new set of restrictions, which according to 

Prime Minister Boris Johnson might stay in place for up
six months.

Some companies, including the British-Swedish AstraZeneca 

are, meanwhile, seeking emergency approval for their 

vaccines from the relevant regulators.

(originally appeared in RT.)


UN probes UK's
disabled rights violations

The UN is to send a delegation to the UK
as part of an inquiry into the “grave and
systematic violations” of the rights of
disabled people --- allegedly taking
place under London’s austerity

 A visit of the UN Committee Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (UNCRPD) is taking place at
the request of the campaign group, 'Disabled
People Against Cuts' using a legal mechanism
 known as the Optional Protocol. The request
was made at the start of 2012. Britain is the
first country to face a high-level inquiry by
 the UN committee.

“This is the first time any country has been
investigated by the UN using the Optional
 Protocol so it will be, if nothing else, a very
 historic event,” Linda Burnip, co-founder of
 Disabled People Against Cuts says, adding
that the process is “long and arduous,”
with strict rules for proof of any claims.

News of the investigation was leaked
back in September. UN inquiries are
usually "confidential", but UNCRPD
confirmed it would be visiting the
UK, after the revelation.

“The inquiry follows a string of scandals
involving disabled people in the UK,
including a rise in hate crimes, which
have been overlooked by police and
 the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS),”
 former director of prosecutions, Lord
 Kenneth MacDonald, says.

Disabled people have been affected
by cuts, nine times more than most
other citizens, according to a report
by the Centre for Welfare Reform,
 in 2013.



Imagine the Rhondda using wind and sun energy
to create new rate and rent free business units,
  that encourage new enterprising companies,
which pay well and market under a "brand"
with a superb reputation for quality.

Everything to help hitting the ground running,
with hot-desking, science, and agriculture,
  to employ our youth.

Image: Russian scientists and Scottish ones

Russian/Scottish scientists hail long-range
secure quantum communication system.

A group of scientists from ITMO University
 in Saint Petersburg, Russia, has developed
a new
approach to constructing quantum
systems for secure data

 The experimental device based on the results of the
 research is capable of transmitting single-photon
 quantum signals across distances of 250 klmtrs
 or more, which is on par with its cutting edge
analogues, the ITMO press-service says.

"Now researchers are on a mission -- to create
 a fully-fledged quantum cryptographic system,
that will generate & distribute quantum keys
 and transmit useful data simultaneously",
 ITMO says.

Information security is becoming more and more
 of a critical issue not only for large companies,
banks and defense enterprises but even for
small businesses and individual users.

But the data encryption algorithms we currently
 use for protecting our data are imperfect - in the
 long-term, their logic can be cracked. Regardless
 of how complex and intricate the algorithm is,
 getting around it, is just a matter of time.

Unlike algorithm-based encryption, systems
 that protect information, by making use of
 fundamental laws of quantum physics, can
make data transmission totally immune to
 hacker attacks, in the future.

Information in a quantum channel is carried
by single photons that change irreversibly
 if an eavesdropper tries to intercept them.
The legitimate users will instantly know
 about any kind of intervention.

Researchers at the Quantum Information Centre
 of the International Institute of Photonics and
 Optical Information Technology at ITMO Uni.,
Russia, along with their colleagues from the
Heriot-Watt University, in Edinburgh, have
 devised a new way to generate and
 distribute, quantum bits.

This makes it possible to share quantum signals
--- via optical fibres --- 250 kilometres in distance.

"To transmit quantum signals, we use the so-
called side frequencies," says Artur Gleim,
head of the Quantum Information Centre, 
 ITMO University,

 "This unique approach gives us a number
 of advantages -- such as a considerable
simplification of the device architecture
 and the large pass-through capacity of
the quantum channel. In terms of bit rate
 and operating distances, our system is
comparable to absolute champions in
the field of quantum communications."

According to Robert Collins, research associate
 at the Institute of Photonics & Quantum Sciences
 at Heriot-Watt University, and one of the authors
of the study, this may become a pivotal point for
 the whole field of quantum communication and

 "Down the track, this new approach can enable
 smooth coexistence of numerous data streams
 with different wavelengths in one single optical
 cable. On top of it, these quantum streams can
 be fed into the already existing fibre optic lines
 --- along with conventional communications."

The research paper is published
in the Optics Express journal.

Scottish universities are to be
congratulated for their strong
& growing links with Chinese
and Russian universities....

What a shame, that Wales is
lying low --- with academics
too scared to break from
military research.

China sent 30 missions
 into space in 2017
- a record!

January 4th, 2017 !!!

China conducted 30 space launch missions in 2017 
--- a record-breaking number in
 the country's
space history, said China Aero-
Science &Technology Corporation.

Long March-5 and Long March-7 rockets are
to carry out most space missions,
the China News Service reported.

Long March-5 is China's largest carrier rocket. The
successful test launch of the vehicle in November,
 in S. China's Hainan Province, has paved the way
for space station construction, analysts said.

Wang Yu, the general director of the Long March-5
 program, said 2017 was a critical year for China's
 new generation of carrier rockets - and Long
March-5 rockets carried Chang'e-5 probe to
space. The probe has landed on the moon,

 collected samples and returned to Earth.

On the other hand, Long March-7, the more powerful
 version of Long March-2, sent China's 1st cargo
 spacecraft Tianzhou-1 into space, in the first
of 2017, according to Wang Zhaoyao,
director of
China Manned Space
Engineering Office.

docked with Tiangong-2 space lab
conducting experiments on propellant

China conducted 22 launch missions in 2016 and 19
 in 2015. The country successfully tested its Long
 March-7 rocket in June 2016, and has gradually
 shifted to new generation rockets that reduce
use of toxic rocket fuels.

China released several white papers on its space
 activities, announcing plans to soft land Chang'
on the moon, by the end of 2017, and launch
first Mars probe, by 2020.

After Chang'e-5, China would launch Chang'e-4
 lunar probe in about 2018 to achieve mankind's
 first soft landing on the far side of the moon - 
and conduct in situ and roving detection and
 relay communications at Earth-moon L2 point.

The white paper also said that iover the next 5
years, China would provide space & aviation
related services to countries involved in the

One Belt and One Road initiative -- such as
satellite communications, navigation and
weather forecasting analysis.

It has now, in 2021, done so.

Image: BRICS

US expert views BRICS as testbed
for new kind of global governance

Xinhua - The BRICS bloc grouping Brazil, Russia, India, China and
South Africa serves as "a testbed" for a "sharing governance" of
 global affairs, a leading US expert said.

"BRICS makes that kind of contribution to the world governance
by providing diversity," said Robert Lawrence Kuhn, chair of the
Kuhn Foundation, in a recent interview with Xinhua.

"I think it would be a mistake, given the nature of humanity, to
have only one organization like the United Nations... " he said,
 adding that a diversity of structures seems to be what makes
 the most sense over time in global governance, since there is
 no perfection.

"It engages them (BRICS nations) to be a sort of hub for broader
 global interaction," Kuhn said, "So Brazil is in South America.
 South Africa is obviously in southern Africa. These become
vehicles to engage more of the world, so that's all positive."

The longtime China observer noted that a greater participation
of the five major emerging economies with "very different
 characteristics" also strengthens momentum for a multi-
polar world, which is crucial for promoting world stability.

"I am all for the key countries, whether judged economically,
 or through other mechanisms, to have greater participation
 in (global) organizations," Kuhn said.

The BRICS New Development Bank (NDB), which is intended
 to focus on infrastructure and sustainable development
projects, stands as a good example, showing "what a
new kind of world governance would look like," he said.

"Everybody has equal voting power. So that's a good sign,"
 he added, referring to the NDB'S distinctive feature -- the
absolutely just distribution of votes between members,
 different from the quota system of other international
 financial institutions, based on the role of a certain

Although with the overwhelmingly largest economy in BRICS,
 China "does not use that power in an aggressive way to take
 control" of the NDB, he noted, "I think that's a good signal.
 And China's doing it because it wants this greater
participation in international affairs."

All BRICS countries should have "a greater say" in the
international financial activity of the World Bank and
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF), he said.

In the World Bank, the BRICS countries, home to 42.6 percent
 of the global population and nearly half of the world's foreign
 exchange reserves, have a total of only 13% of voting rights,
 while the United States alone, holds 15 percent.

The IMF agreed in 2010 to give emerging economies a greater
vote in decision-making, but the reform has been blocked by
 the United States, despite the fact that more than 140
countries have approved it.

"These should be adjusted... that's just not aligned
 with today's world, in the same way," he said.

Since the first foreign ministers' meeting in 2006, BRICS countries
have seen ten years of rapid expansion in trade and economies.
They currently account for nearly a quarter of the world economy
 and contributed more than half of global economic growth in 2016.

The 9th annual summit of the bloc, scheduled for Sept. 3rd-5th, in
Xiamen City of southeast China's Fujian Province, is expected to
 produce a declaration that lays out both the progress BRICS has
made so far and its vision of future cooperation.

A "BRICS Plus" mode, is expected to expand the bloc's partnership
-- especially with developing countries -- providing opportunities for
other economies and injecting impetus into economic globalization,
and will help make it a leading platform for South-South cooperation.


West shocked at success
of Russian economy
- despite sanctions
August 14th, 2017
 Fort Russ News - KtovKurse
translated by Inessa Sinchougova

Despite the sanctions and the fall in oil prices,
the Russian economy has grown at its fastest
pace since the third quarter of 2012, German
'paper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung states.

According to Rosstat, the growth rate of economic
development in the second quarter of this year by
 2.5%, exceeded similar indicators in 2016. Since
the end of last year, the country's GDP has
 increased again, which wasn't observed
 for seven quarters, before.

According to analysts interviewed, monthly indicators
of economic activity, suggest a recovery of Russia's
 economy on a broad basis. "There was a sharp rise
in construction and industry," commented Rosstat's
data to Capital Economics research company.

Growth was also observed in the sphere of trade. At the
 same time, it was noted that agriculture is the only
sector of the economy that has not yet fully
recovered. This area in the 2nd quarter,
 showed a decline.

In general, however, GDP growth during the second quarter
was lower than the government's forecast (2.7%), the news-
paper stated.

Sanctions taught Russia to count "on oneself", in the
development of its own industries, small, & medium-
sized businesses.

The representative of the Institute of Contemporary
Development, Nikita Maslenikov, agrees that Russia's
economy has already adapted to the imposed external
constraints and the latest US sanctions will not have
a significant impact. In his opinion, because of these
sanctions, Russia will lose only "a few tenths" of
the annual rate of its GDP growth.


Donetsk revives local bus
 manufacturing industry
August 11th, 2017
 Fort Russ News - DNR News
 by Inessa Sinchougova

The Head of the Donetsk Republic, Alexander Zakharchenko,
paid a working visit to the state enterprise Donetskgormash,
 where the first Donbass buses have been assembled. The
plant was also visited by the Deputy Chair of the Council of
Ministers of the DPR, Alexander Timofeev, and the Acting
 President. Minister of Industry & Trade, Alexey Granovsky.

The managers of the enterprise conducted a tour of the
 plant, where Zakharchenko got acquainted with the
 technological characteristics of the "Donbass" bus
- and the stages of its assembly. The Republic's
demand for city and suburban needs for 2017,
 is about 400 units, due to a lack of transport
options because of the conflict.

Russia plans to abolish preferences
 to foreign aircraft makers from
2019 - deputy PM
August 6th

Dmitry Rogozin said that a plan of replacing all
foreign aircraft by Russian-made analogues
 has already been drafted and submitted
to President Vladimir Putin

TASS - Russia plans to begin abolishing preferences to
foreign aircraft manufacturers from 2019, to regain
control over the domestic civil aircraft market,
 Russian Deputy PM Dmitry Rogozin said
 on Sunday.

"Today, we produce 30 planes a year, which is 25 less
 than Airbus or Boeing but by 2025 we plan to already
manufacture 110 planes a year," he said in an
 interview with the Sunday evening news
 roundup on Rossiya-1 tv channel.

 "As production of domestic aircraft increases - we
will abolish the privileges foreign aircraft-makers
are enjoying, say, from 2019."

According to official statistics cited by Rogpzin, Russia
 strongly depends on foreign aircraft manufacturers.
 Thus, in his words, it has bought 367 foreign-made
  planes since 2013. Apart from that, he noted that
 big funds are spent to lease foreign planes.

 "Being dependent on foreign aircraft makers, we spend
 and pay abroad some 470 billion rubles (7.83 billion US
 dollars) a year. It is an insult to the nation, an insult to
our aviation power and we couldn't stand such a state
 of things any longer," he said, adding that it was the
 reason to encourage the development and
 production of new Russian aircraft,
 including the MC-21 and Sukhoi
Superjet 100 planes.

The deputy prime minister said that a plan of replacing
all foreign aircraft by Russian-made analogues, has
already been drafted and submitted to President
Vladimir Putin.

"We will regain this market. If we did it in the defense
 sector, we can do it in the civil sector as well," he


BRICS countries strike fatal
 blow on US dollar supremacy
August 4th 2017
The United States has declared a war of sanctions
on Russia and continues putting trade pressure on
 China. It is not ruled out that the USA will restrict
supplies of steel products from China. In return,
Moscow and Beijing intend to abolish the US
dollar in settlements within the scope of
the BRICS organization. The move will
mark the end of the era of undivided
 financial domination of the United
States of America, in the world.

As soon as the US Congress adopted a package of
 new sanctions against Russia, the Deputy Foreign
Minister of the Russian Federation Sergei Ryabkov
 issued a formidable warning to Washington.

"US sanctions against Russia will only encourage
 Russia to create an alternative economic system,
in which dollars will not be needed," the Russian
 diplomat said.

Interestingly, the statement was made on the eve
 of the two-day summit of BRICS trade ministers,
which opened on August 1, 2017 in Shanghai.
This organization, which includes Brazil,
Russia, India, China and South Africa,
becomes a powerful counterweight
 to the Group of Seven.

Today, the BRICS countries account for 26% of the
Earth's territory, 42% of its population (almost
three billion people) and 27% of world GDP.

According to experts' forecasts, the share
 of BRICS countries will account for more
than 40% of world GDP, by 2050.

However, BRICS trade ministers chose
not to put the horse before the cart.

Russia's Minister for Economic Development Maxim
 Oreshkin stated that BRICS countries, in particular
 Russia and China, may switch to settlements in
national currencies already in the near future.
The minister also said that trade turnover
 between Russia and China may reach
$200 billion by 2020.

Meanwhile, on the sidelines of the Shanghai summit,
the ministers discussed opportunities for creating a
 new monetary system to exclude the use of the US
dollar. In 2015, President Vladimir Putin said that
Russia was opting for settlements in national
 currencies and has created currency pools
with several countries.

Today, not only does Russia need to abjure the dollar -
 the country needs to ensure financial independence
 from the West. BRICS countries have coordinated
 basic principles of the New Development Bank's
work, which is seen as a counterbalance to the
 World Bank, in which it is the US who sets the
 rules of the game.

In addition, Russia considers the possibility of
 setting up a separate payment system similar
 to SWIFT.

More than 300 Russian banks have switched to an
alternative to SWIFT - the system known as SPFS
 (System for Transfer of Financial Messages).

Elvira Nabiullina, Chairwoman of the Central Bank of
 Russia, said: "Threats were voiced that Russia could
 be cut off from SWIFT. We have completed the work
 on our own payment system, and --- if something
happens --- all operations in SWIFT format will
work inside the country."

One of the main conditions for switching to settlements
in national currencies, is the stability of the national
currencies of the BRICS members. The Russian
ruble exchange rate may decrease due to
relatively low world oil prices (within
$52 per barrel).

The unstable exchange rates of national currencies, is
not the only obstacle to abjure the US dollar in mutual
settlements. BRICS countries account for only 10%
of global trade. Therefore, the alliance needs to
increase its indicators of mutual trade.

Moscow and Beijing have already introduced mutual
settlements in yuans. Russia's Central Bank has
opened its first foreign office in Beijing.

Thus, the war of sanctions against Russia consolidates
 and boosts relations between Russia, China and other
BRICS members.
Aydin Mehtiyev



China to continue to be key
 driver of global growth -
IMF chief economist
July 24th, 2017
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Monday,
 revised upwards, China's growth forecast for 2017
 and 2018...  to 6.7% and 6.4%, respectively.

China's growth will continue to be a key driver for a
 (firming) recovery of the world economy, the chief
economist of the International Monetary Fund
 (IMF) said on Monday.

The updated World Economic Outlook report published
by the IMF on Monday, which came days after China
 posted a stronger-than-expected second quarterly
 performance, Is a reflection of a solid first quarter,
 underpinned by previous policy easing and supply
-side reforms, including efforts to reduce excess
capacity in the industrial sector, according to
the IMF.

"We have seen very strong growth and, especially
beyond our update, the second quarter's figure of
6.9& is also above expectation. So clearly growth
 is proceeding at pace," Obstfeld said.

"Strong Chinese growth drives growth, particularly
in the Asia region, but also throughout the world,"
Obstfeld added, noting that China is a big
contributor to overall growth, and has
a very large spillover effect, on the
world's economy.

(Source - Xinhua)


EU warns US of ‘unintended
consequences’ over fresh
anti-Russia sanctions
Saturday July 22nd, at 10:34pm

The EU has warned the US over “unintended consequences”
which may result from imposing more sanctions on Russia.

The European Commission released a statement on Saturday,
warning that imposing new sanctions against Russia without
coordination with the G7 countries, may have "wide and
indiscriminate" "unintended consequences."

The statement was released after Republicans & Democrats
 in the US Congress, reached a deal which could result in
 further anti-Russia sanctions.

Germany has already announced that it may engage in
 retaliatory moves, if the US sanctions German firms
 involved in the construction of a new Baltic pipe-
line for Russian gas.

"We understand that the Russia/Iran sanctions bill is
driven primarily by domestic considerations," read
the statement, in reference to last month's bill
passed by the US Senate.

"As we have said repeatedly, it is important that any
possible new measures are coordinated between
international partners to maintain unity among
 partners on the sanctions that have been
# underpinning the efforts for a full
 implementation of the Minsk
 Agreements," it added.

The economic sanctions against Moscow were
originally introduced in March 2014, after the
 strategic Black Sea peninsula of Crimea
 rejoined Russia after a referendum.

Since then, the EU, the US and some other Western
countries have imposed several rounds of sanctions
against Russia over accusations that Moscow has
 been involved in the deadly crisis in Ukraine,
which has so far killed over 10,000 people.
The Kremlin has, however, strongly
 rejected the accusations.

Ukraine’s armed conflict broke out when Kiev
launched military operations to crack down
on pro-Russia anti-US coup forces in the
eastern sector of the country.

In September 2014, the government in Kiev and the
pro-Russia anti-US coup forces signed a ceasefire
 agreement in the Belarusian capital of Minsk, in a
 bid to halt the clashes in Ukraine’s eastern regions.

The warring sides also inked another truce deal,
 dubbed Minsk II, in February 2015, under the
supervision of Russia, Germany and France.

"Sanctions are at their most effective when they are
 coordinated. Currently our sanctions regimes are
coordinated. As a result their impact on the ground
 is increased and through coordination we are able
 to avoid surprises, manage any potential impact
 on our own economic operators, and address
 collectively, efforts to circumvent such
 measures. Unilateral measures would
 undermine this," it notes.

(Source - PressTv)


Africa has potential to have e-commerce
 bigger than EU and US: stresses Jack Ma
 July 22nd 2017

Chinese billionaire entrepreneur Jack Ma on Friday
advised African youth entrepreneurs to think out
of the box and create a bigger e-commerce on
 the continent.

He made the remarks while delivering his keynote
 address at the inauguration of the YouthConnekt
Africa Summit, in the Rwandan capital Kigali,
which focuses on promoting job creation
through entrepreneurship and skills
development with Africa's youth.

"Africa is the home & solution for the inclusive economy
the world needs. Think big, and think about the future.
You have great potential: the future of e-commerce
in Africa, is bigger than for Europe & the US," said
Ma, founder of China's e-commerce giant, Alibaba.

"Think big for the future. It took me 18 years to build
e-commerce, but it could take you 5 to 8 years to
build e-commerce in Africa, since the continent
has already laid a conducive environment for
 you to thrive," said the special advisor of the
 United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development (UNCTAD).

He said that African entrepreneurs should learn from
 failure. "Africa has to get used to failure. If you can't,
then how can you succeed?"

The three-day summit is organized by the government
of Rwanda, the United Nations Conference on Trade
 and Development (UNCTAD) and UNDP. The summit,
 from July the 19th to the 21st, is dubbed:
 "Realizing Africa's Youth Potential."

It has attracted more than 3,000 participants including
top executives from multinational companies, leaders
of civil society organizations, Africa's development
partners, members of the academia, and youth
 entrepreneurs from 90 countries across Africa
 and beyond, to interact & discuss enhancing
 the potential of youth in Africa, according
 to the organizers.

At the summit, Ma announced four projects to support
 African entrepreneurs, African young people and the
efforts of conservation in Africa.

The four projects are:

 supporting 200 African entrepreneurs
over the next five years;

working with universities and governments
to develop training programs for African
young people on e-commerce and
cloud computing;

setting up a conservation award
for conservation rangers;

 and donating 10 million US dollars to establish
 a young entrepreneurs development fund.

(Source: Xinhua)


EU trying to solve its problems
by targeting Iran and others'
exports with huge
law-breaking duties
July 19th, 2017

The European Union is targeting Iran’s hot-rolled
 steel --- planning to hit imports from the country
with punitive trade tariffs. 

According to a document cited in the European
media, the European Commission is proposing
duties of up to 23 percent for steel from Iran's
Mobarakeh Steel Co.

European steel lobby group Eurofer is at the centre
 of the campaign and has forced Europe’s trade
 policy oversight European Commission,
to intervene and check imports.

Brazil, Russia & Ukraine, are the other countries
the Commission is planning to target with duties
of up to 33%.   

There is no immediate reaction to the plan from
 the countries being targeted. In June, China
reacted furiously after the European Union
set duties of up to 35.9 percent on
Chinese hot-rolled steel.

Eurofer says Iranian exports to Europe have leapt
 to more than 1 million tonnes annually, accusing
Mobarakeh of "trade distorting measures."

Mobarakeh Steel Co is Iran’s largest steel
producer with 7.2 million tonnes per year. 

Europe’s tough stance, including its more than 40
 restrictive measures, aimed at aiding European
 steel producers --- has sparked accusations of
protectionism by international steel exporters.

The bloc’s steel producers have been pressuring
the European leaders to copy the US’s draconian
 regulations, including levies of more than 500%
 on steel imports, in some cases.

Steelmakers across Europe are faced with mass
 redundancies because of their high energy costs.
Their leaders say 320,000 jobs in the European
 steel industry, are ''at risk from imports''.

Steel is the second biggest industry in the world
after oil and gas. The commodity was Iran's
 largest export item after oil, gas and petro-
chemicals last year, partly because of
 the slump in domestic construction.

The country has been boosting steel production,
targeting an output plateau of 55 million tonnes
per year by 2015.

Iran enjoys an advantage because production
costs at the majority of its steelworks are
 internationally competitive, because of
 low energy prices in the country.

It exported 4 million tonnes of steel last year,
according to director of the Iranian Mines and
 Mining Industries Development & Renovation
 Organization (IMIDRO), Mehdi Karbasian.

Currently, the nation produces 16 million tonnes,
 which is 1% of the world total. A statement on
IMIDRO’s website says exports are expected
to hit 20-25 million tonnes by 2025.

Steel is a strategic commodity for the country of
80 million, which has the Middle East’s biggest
carmaker. It is also key to Iran's massive oil
and gas industry, transportation network,
water supply, urban centres and
mammoth construction sector.

Last month, Austria said it had allocated a credit
line of 1 billion euros for a major steel production
 project in southern Iran.

(Source - PressTv)


Russia China Trade B(l)ooming
July 1st, 2017

China's General Administration of Customs states that
China-Russia trade grew 33.7% in the first five months
 of this year, to 223.1 billion yuan ($32.8 billion).

(Source - Xinhua)


AIIB approves membership of

Argentina, Madagascar, Tonga
June 17th 2017
Xinhua - The China-initiated Asian Infrastructure Investment
 Bank (AIIB) on Friday approved the memberships of
Argentina, the Republic of Madagascar and the
Kingdom of Tonga at its second annual
meeting of governors.

The AIIB's board of governors adopted resolutions approving
the three applicants to join the bank at the second annual
meeting, which kicked off earlier in the day in South
 Korea's southern resort island of Jeju.

The first meeting was held in Beijing last year.

The approved applicants included one regional prospective
member, Tonga, and two non-regional members, Argentina
and Madagascar.

"Well-integrated infrastructure and enhanced connectivity
between Asia and the rest of the world has far-reaching
benefits for the global economy," said AIIB President
 Jin Liqun.

Tonga was well known as the friendly islands in the South
 Pacific, while Argentina and Madagascar are important
 economies in South America and Africa each, said Jin.

The AIIB chief expressed his anticipation of the role the
 3 new members will play, once they fully join the bank.

The three prospective members will officially join the AIIB
 once they complete the required domestic processes and
 deposit the first installment of capital with the bank.

Shares allocated to the new prospective members come
 from the bank's existing pool of unallocated shares.

"Since launching only 18 months ago, the bank has
welcomed 23 new members from around the
world," said Sir Danny Alexander, vice
president and corporate secretary
at the AIIB.

The vice chief said interest in the AIIB remained high and
that the bank's door remained open to the new members
that will be joining later this year.

Officially launched in January 2016, the Beijing-based AIIB
 is a multilateral development bank initiated by China and
supported by a wide range of countries and regions,
which will provide financing for infrastructure
 improvement in Asia.

The international infrastructure bank owned about 100 billion
 US dollars of subscribed capital, including some 20 billion
dollars in paid-in capital.

This year's annual meeting gathered about 2,000
participants, including delegations of founding
members and the new members, international
organizations and academia...  as well as
 businessmen, financiers and journalists.

The attendees included over 20 finance ministers
of approved AIIB members, according to South
Korea's finance ministry.

The second annual meeting was held under the theme of
"Sustainable Infrastructure," seeking strategic directions
 of the international infrastructure bank and making
major decisions on the bank's management.


Israel’s economy heading
for disaster, experts warn
May 29th, 2017

A report released by the Taub Center for Social Policy
 Studies in Israel shows the country has the highest
poverty rates among OECD countries --- and faces
 “worrisome trends” that could have disastrous
 effects on its growing population.

According to the Picture of the Nation 2017 report,
with Israel’s aging population and rising costs
 across the board, its “current sources of
 economic growth are not sustainable.”

The country ranks 22nd out of 34 of the OECD
(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development) regarding GDP and takes 24th
 spot within the market income poverty rate.

Among developed countries, Israel has the highest
 percentage of its population below the poverty line.

“The past year has seen a decline in unemployment
 and a large rise in GDP,” however, “unfortunately, it
appears that this positive trend will not continue
 and new sources of growth must be found,”
 said the report.

The Taub Center described Israel’s 4% GDP
 growth as an “outlier and not a trend.”

A separate report which was released earlier this month
 by the Shoresh Institution for Socioeconomic Research
 looked at economic trends in the whole 69-year history
 of the country. It concluded the economy shows deep-
seated and long-term shortcomings that threaten to
weaken the army and constitute an “existential
threat” to the country’s future.

In terms of GDP, Israel has been falling further and further
 behind the G7 average since the mid-1970s, with a more
 than threefold increase having developed in the gap
between them. This, says the report, “reflects a
steadily widening disparity between what an
employed person living in Israel can attain
 and what that person could attain in the
 countries that are pulling away
 from Israel.”

Professor Dan Ben-David, founder and chair of the
Shoresh Institution and co-author of the report,
warned if Israel’s PM Benjamin Netanyahu
“continues to ignore the future” the
 country could face a catastrophe
 of massive proportions.

Netanyahu has recently held some meetings with Israeli
 media outlets, claiming the reports do not reflect “what
 the public feels.”

“It's an industry of despair. Where they see unemployment,
I see full employment. Where they see an economy in ruin,
 I see a flourishing economy. Where they see traffic jams,
I see junctions, trains, and bridges. Where they see a
crumbling state nearing collapse, I see Israel as a
 rising global power,” he was cited as saying
 by the Times of Israel.

(Source - RT)


'Finance Curse'
Scheduled to Tighten
 Its Grip on UK Significantly by 2022
May 2nd 2017, at 8:01pm

The UK Trades Union Congress (TUC) has published projections
 suggesting the UK economy will be highly unbalanced by 2022
– economic activity heavily skewed towards London, and the
wider economy dependent on finance. The Tax Justice
Network (TJN) has said such a development would be
a symptom of the UK's "Finance Curse."

In all, the TUC forecasts S. East England will produce 40.1 percent
 of the UK's gross domestic product by 2022, of which London will
 provide 25 percent (or 62.5 percent of the South East's total
 economic share). This represents a rise of 2.5 percentage
 points from 2015, and over seven percent from 1997.

The Congress projects the most significant falls in the share of the
 economy come in 2022 and will be suffered in Yorkshire (dropping
0.5 percentage points to just 6.1 percent), the North West (down 0.4
 to nine percent%) and Scotland (falling 0.4 to 7.2 percent).

Given the importance of the City of London's offshore financial centre
 to the region, the Tax Justice Network believes the TUC's forecasts
are a vivid demonstration of the "Finance Curse" in action —
organization directors John Christensen and Nicholas Shaxson
 argue the City of London has been a major contributing factor
to the dramatic decline in British manufacturing since the
1970s, and the impoverishment of non-South East
 regions of the country.

The emphasis on finance in the UK has, they believe, resulted in flows
of foreign capital into the UK going straight to the City, for the purpose
 of mergers and acquisitions and real estate purchases rather than
 investment. Moreover, it has produced a "brain drain" effect in
many industries, with upper tier university graduates being
 enticed by finance, and eschewing other valuable sectors
 of the economy.

The UK's bloated financial sector has also helped to disguise the
damage the industry itself has caused, by smoothing over
 declining wages and falling levels of employment, via
borrowing. When downturns and recessions occur,
 the long-term damage inflicted on other sectors
 of the economy by a myopic national focus on
 finance are revealed — but those sectors are
 harder to resuscitate than finance, and may
 end up being irrecoverable.

(source - Sputnik)


European Union demands
UK must repay Fraud cash

March 8th 2017

 The European Office of Struggle against Fraud (OLAF)
demanded today that the United Kingdom pay for two
billion euros of customs fraud.

An official report adds that the claim is due to the fact
 that London ignored, for years, this type of practice,
 above all, in the importation of textiles and Chinese
 shoes, thereby affecting the community budget.

The text says this protest is regardless of Brexit
 or a British exit from the European Union (EU),
scheduled to become a reality this month.

Research carried out from 2013 to 2016, revealed
 a customs fraud of expanded reach --- carried out
by a group of criminal gangs, who systematically
 declared lower values for the imported products.

According to OLAF, the United Kingdom was the main
 centre of that fraudulent trade. Other countries of the
 European Union fought against that problem, while
 the illegal business grew in the British isles.

In that period, that practice inflicted losses on the EU
 of one billion 987 million euros, concludes the probe.
 The customs tariffs are one of the main sources of
financing the EU budget.

OLAF launches severe accusations against the United
 Kingdom and assures that, for years, authorities were
 alerted about the losses, without doing anything to
 prevent them, or open investigations on this issue.

(source - Prensa Latina)


China Usurps US As Germany’s
 Biggest Trade Partner
25/2/2017 at 03:36

China has taken another step in global economic
 dominance: becoming Germany’s most significant
 international trading partner: a place the US had.

Germany sent and received with China, goods and
 services worth approximately $180 billion in 2016,
 according to recent Federal Statistics Office data.
France was Germany’s second-largest trade ally,
 while the US ranked third.

 In 2015, the US enjoyed a brief stint as Germany’s
 top trade partner, a spot occupied by France, for
 the previous half-century.

Optimism among exporters in China, the world’s
 third-largest economy, is “rising further,” says
Clemens Faust, of Ifo Institute for Economic
 Research, a Munich-based think tank.

(source - Sputnik)


Politician: European-style reforms
to degrade Ukraine’s economy
 January 23rd
Ukraine’s economy has been degrading as its
 dependence on commodity exports grows as
a result of "European-style reforms", leader
of the Ukrainian Choice public movement,
 Viktor Medvedchuk said Monday, in
a LiveJournal post.

"Rather than developing innovations to achieve
 a technological breakthrough, we have been
witnessing destruction of the country’s high
 tech industries. In 2013, the share of various
 machines, equipment and transport vehicles
in our exports was 16.3%, but, in 2014, it
 dropped to 13.2% and to 12.1% in 2015.
 During the first 11 months of 2016, this
share fell to 11.6%," he elaborated.

At the same time, Medvedchuk stressed that
agricultural exports had grown, reaching 41.6%
during the January to November period of 2016.

"However, there is nothing to celebrate: we
export only agricultural commodities while
 'ready-to-use' food products’ share is 6.6%.
 Where agriculture is concerned, structural
problems have been growing: it would be
enough to say that livestock population
has been decreasing, which may create
serious problems in the next few years,"
 he added.

The politician also pointed to the planned
education reforms, bound to "contribute to
 the process of turning Ukraine into a banana
republic." The country’s education ministry...
"has decided that children in 10th and 11th
 grades do not need that many physics,
 chemistry, mathematics & informatics
 classes so it is better to declare
those subjects, as optional."

"Really --- why build nuclear power plants and
produce machines? This reformed education
will be enough to grow sunflowers and
rapeseeds," Medvedchuk concluded.

(source - TASS)


Russian, Armenian PMs to discuss
integration cooperation within EAEU
January 24th, 2017
Integration cooperation between Russia & Armenia
 within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) will be
the focus of talks between Russian Prime Minister
 Dmitry Medvedev and his Armenian counterpart,
Karen Karapetyan, who arrives in Moscow on
 Tuesday, at the invitation of the Russian

The agenda of the talks will include issues of
 Russian-Armenian cooperation in the area of
trade-and-economic relations, and in such
 sectors as energy, transport, and the

 The 2 prime ministers will also discuss the
implementation of joint investment projects
Russia's government's press service said.

The talks are expected to yield a number
 of intergovernmental & inter-ministerial

(source - TASS)


All countries observing oil output cuts
 agreement — Russian energy minister
January 22, 17:04
TASS - All countries are observing the agreement
on cutting output, Russia's Minister of Energy
 Alexander Novak told media on Sunday.

The IMF expects oil prices to grow
 by almost 20% in 2017.

"On the agreement's fulfilment - I can
 say, we see with satisfaction, the
successful implementation of the
agreement & joint action of OPEC
 & non-cartel countries, stabilizing
 the situation on the oil market,"
he said.

"We have seen the statement made by Saudi
Arabia’s minister claiming the country cut
output by more than the agreement
he said.

"Russia observes its obligations faster - and
cuts are almost twice faster than planned.
The ministers' committee will be meeting
 every other month and, prior to the next
 (in May) OPEC summit, it will have two
meetings," the minister said.

"Today, we have noted that the situation on
the market is approaching balance, stock is
 lowering already. Most importantly", he said
 "we can see stability and lower volatility.".

"I think the statistics data for January will show
 cuts of over 1.7 million barrels a day," he said.

"The potential for price growth is exhausted.
 In general, the situation can be viewed as
 follows: oil prices are going to be from
 $50 to $60 per barrel," he said.


Goldman Sachs evacuates UK
19th of January, 2017. 

US bank Goldman Sachs will move 1,000 staff from
 London to Frankfurt as a post-Brexit reorganisation
 that will reduce its City headcount by half, German
business daily Handelsblatt reports on 19 January.

“The bank is weighing transferring up to 1,000 employees
 to Frankfurt, including traders as well as top bankers,”
the paper reports, citing financial industry sources.

In total, Goldman Sachs will cut its head-
count in London, from 6,000...  to 3,000.

(source - Katehon)


Moldova's New President Hopes to
Cancel EU Association Agreement
January 17th, 2017
Moldova’s President said on Tuesday that he
 hopes the country’s association agreement
with the European Union will be cancelled..
 if his party obtains a parliamentary majority,
 paving the way for an alliance with Moscow.

“I don’t exclude that, after the next parliament
polls, this agreement will be annulled,” if the
 socialist party wins the majority of seats in
 the next election, Igor Dodon noted on his
first foreign trip to Moscow, after meeting
with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

(source - Al Manar)


Metallurgical Plant

 - relaunched in spring 2017
January 12th, 2017

One of the biggest industrial enterprises of the
Donetsk People’s Republic, founded by a Welsh
entrepeneur in the 19th century, was relaunched

 in the spring of 2017, the press-service of the
DPR's Ministry of Industry and Trade, reports.

Also, DPR's industrial enterprises, Donfrost
 and Nord, are now producing 51,000 fridges.

It's necessary to point out that the production
 of fridges in Nord factory stopped completely
 in August 2016, and the Donfrost plant was
 established at that time. Now this plant is
 working with FSR states (Former Soviet
 Republics) and in Asia, where 70% of
DPR's production, is imported.


World Economic Forum director calls
on EU: to reset relations with Russia
December 31st, 2016

"A reset in the complicated situation of the kind
could be a very important step" - Philipp Rosler

The World Economic Forum’s Managing Board
 Member and Director, Philipp Rosler, calls on
 the EU to improve relations with Russia. The
former German chancellor's statement came
in an interview with the Neuer Osnabrucker
 Zeitung newspaper, published on Saturday.

"A reset in the complicated situation of the kind
could be a very important step," he said, adding
both sides now, should offer respective signals.

"Achieving mutual understanding on the European
 continent is necessary and is, first of all, the affair
 of Europeans, not Americans," Rosler said. "Using
 these approaches, we should structure policies."

The official said the issue of how to behave with
 Russia after the Soviet Union collapsed, has not
 been cleared up, and "today, we can see what
conflicts have arisen from this negligence,"
 he added.

(Source - TASS)



TASS - Gazprom sees some risks for gas transit
 through Ukraine to Europe, and in the case of
unsanctioned gas tapping by Ukraine, it may
cut off supplies to the EU, Gazprom's CEO,
 Alexei Miller, told reporters.

"Indeed there are risks for gas transit to Europe (via
 Ukraine). In the contract, which was signed in 2009,
we clearly fix all cases of force majeure. If Ukraine
 starts gas tapping, then we can either cut supply
 by the volume of illegally taken gas, or can carry
out a disproportionate reduction. But we may
stop deliveries all together, even after a
single unauthorized tapping of gas,"
 Miller said.



IMF Data Shows China’s GDP
Outpaces US's --------- in 2016

In purchasing power parity, China’s gross domestic
 product (GDP) will exceed that of the US by some
 $2.7 trillion, in 2016.

The figures come from a recent International
 Monetary Fund (IMF) estimate, and serve to
shift the canon that the US is the world’s
 primary economic superpower.

Economists forecast that US GDP will measure
 some $18.5 trillion, while China is expected to
 net $21.2 trillion in GDP, as per IMF data.


Russia's 'Syria countersanctions' 
will hit the West below the belt

The West and Russia are entering the third year
 of a war of sanctions. Washington threatens to
  impose new sanctions against Russia, this time
 for Syria. Russia will take "painful measures" in
 response, the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister,
 Sergei Ryabkov, says.

 Pravda.Ru offers a list of counter sanctions that
 we compiled on the basis of experts' opinions.

1. Russia's first answer would be the abolition of
neo-liberal economic policies and a transition to
 a new economic development strategy. This can
block Western influence channels on our country
 & thus become the most asymmetric, but tough
answer, to any new Western sanctions, noted
Ruslan Dzarasov, Doctor of Economics, head
 of the department of political economy, at
 Russia's 'Plekhanov' Economic University.

The expert noted that "we continue to adhere to the
 export growth model, taking capital to the West and
forming a budget on the basis of financial interests
 of capital rather than domestic consumers." Russia,
the expert said, should introduce a combination of
 state planning and a market sector, "similar to
 what the USSR was doing during the 1920s."

"The state should ensure the financial transparency
 of corporations, expand the rights of trade unions
 and workers, strengthen social control over big
 business, & show influence on the formation of
prices in the economy, to stop price disparities
 in favour of the mining export sector, and to
 the detriment of manufacturing industry,"
 Ruslan Dzarasov told Pravda.Ru.

2. Russia could refuse to save its reserves in US
dollars. Russia doesn't take first place in terms
 of dollar savings in the world - but it could still
give a serious blow to the Western financial
system, Dr Valentin Katasonov, Economics
 Professor at the Moscow State Institute of
 International Finance, and head of Russia's
Sharapov Economic Society, told Pravda.Ru.

"A lot of Russia's liabilities in national gold
 and currency reserves, are denominated
in US dollars. Should they be put on the
market --- the dollar will suffer greatly,"
 leading expert at the Union of Oil and
Gas Industrialists, Rustam Tankan said.

Noteworthy: some private Russian companies
have already abandoned the US dollar in their
 activities. Megafon, one of Russia's 3 leading
 cellular providers, converted about 40% of its
dollar deposits to euros & Hong Kong dollars.
The company transferred the funds to major
 Chinese bank accounts. Norilsk Nickel took
similar measures. The Hong Kong dollar is a
Chinese foreign clone of the dollar, and the
 US is unable to impose any sanctions on
 this currency.

 Russia has started abandoning the US dollar as
 a reserve currency, by opening a Raw Materials
 Exchange in St. Petersburg, where Russian
energy carriers are traded in rubles.

3. Russia could freeze US investors' assets in
the Russian economy. "Foreign citizens are
the ultimate beneficiaries of our shadow
 holdings. There are 'tricky' financial
mechanisms in the timber industry,
for instance," Igor Gerasimov, a
member of the Committee for
Business Security at the
 Chamber of Commerce,
 and security expert,
told Pravda.Ru.

The shadow mechanism works as follows...
wood-working firm does most of the work,
while most of the profit goes to a "general

contractor." The latter pays the company a
relative price for production, & a minimum
 profit. Most of the profit goes to specific
 individuals, to the accounts of foreign
 companies. Therefore, Russia could
adopt laws over the nationalization
of natural resources & city-forming
 enterprises, said Igor Gerasimov.

4. The State Duma of the Russian Federation
 has already discussed a draft law to relieve
both state-run and privately-owned Russian
companies of $700 billion of debts... which
are held by Western banks in countries
now threatening sanctions on Russia.

5. Sanctions in the field of high technology, will
be no less sensitive. "Russian titanium will stop
 arriving at European companies, and this will
 certainly be a very significant act of pressure
on our partners," Alexei Mukhin, general
 director of the Centre for Political
Information, told Pravda.Ru.

Boeing & United Technologies, as well as Europe's
 Airbus Group, purchase most of their titanium from
 Avisma, a Russian company, which happens to be
 the world's largest titanium producer. Yet this
covers only about 30% of their needs. The US,
however, is entirely dependent on Russia for
its rocket engines. RD-180 is a 6-ton liquid
 rocket engine, with a thrust of 400+ tons.
 The US has used Russian rocket engines
since 2000. The US Congress passed a
 budget which provides for the allocation
 of 100s of millions of dollars... to buy an
  "unlimited" number of RD-180 engines.

6. Russia's sanctions against Western airlines
would lead to their elimination. A great deal
of airlines fly across the territory of Russia
and save a lot of money on this, chair of
the Federation Council Committee on
International Affairs, Andrei Klimov,
told Pravda.Ru.

"If all of a sudden, the Russian authorities try
 to do something in this field, it will generate
huge profits to companies from such states
 as the United Arab Emirates, & at the same
 time, it will cause serious financial damage
 to German, French and other air carriers,"
 said the expert.

7. Many large companies in the West have strong
 lobbies in legislative authorities. Therefore, the
 input of targeted sanctions... under the pretext
of rules and regulations violations, would be a
very strong response. Starting from 1 Nov 2016
Russia banned imports of salt from the EU, the
 US, Canada, Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein,
 Montenegro, Albania and Ukraine.

 On 15 February 2016, Russia banned imports
 of soybeans and corn from the US, including
 through third countries. Russia still imports
 various US food products, spending millions
 of US dollars a year (PepsiCo, Starbucks,
Cargill, McDonald's), pharmaceuticals
 (Pfizer), cosmetic products (Procter &
 Gamble, Johnson & Johnson), plastics,
 machinery, textiles, footwear, auto-
mobiles (Ford, General Motors), as
well as products under a "secret
code" worth $554 million --- in
 the first half of 2016, alone.

Lyuba Lulko


World Central banks get

rid of US securities
Thursday, 20th of October, 2016. 

The number of US bonds shrank dramatically
 last month (27.5 billion dollars). This decline
is the biggest this year. As a result, the
value of US securities, has fallen.

Now their total cost is about $3 trillion.
This is the lowest level in five years.

China & Saudi Arabia are the leaders among
 those countries which are selling US bonds.


IMF heralds catastrophe for

major banks of EU and US
Source: REX

The International Monetary Fund said in a report
 published on October 5th 2016, that a significant
number of major banks in the wealthiest states
of the world, are so weak, that neither growth
in the world economy, nor an increase in
interest rates, will help them solve
their problems.

The problematic credit organizations include one-
third of Europe's banks with assets totaling $8.5
 trillion and a quarter of US banks with assets
worth $3.2 trillion.

According to the IMF, financial stability now
 depends, on how well financial institutions
can adapt themselves to the new era with
tougher regulation and supervision,
restrained growth and low
interest rates.

Experts note that despite an improvement in the
 structure of bank assets and equity indices, low
 profitability remains a significant problem, that
 can not be solved through cycles of economic

The report, in particular, draws attention to the
euro-zone banks, profits of which, have halved,
since the average levels of 2003-2006.

Experts believe that Europe lags behind the US
 in terms of the disposal of bad loans. Both the
IMF and the European Central Bank see loose
 monetary policy as the main cause of bank

IMF experts also remained concerned about
the financial stability of Japan and China. At
 the same time, experts point out decreasing
 pressure on emerging markets, against the
backdrop of higher prices on raw materials
and a certain stabilization of the Chinese


Vietnam joins Russia-led
free trade zone

A free trade agreement between the Russian-led
 Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) and Vietnam
 takes effect now with its ratification. The
deal opens the EEU's market of 181

million people to Vietnam.

The EEU countries – Russia, Armenia, Belarus,
 Kazakhstan & Kyrgyzstan – get the opportunity
 to sell goods in Vietnam on a preferential basis.

The free trade deal covers more than 90 percent
 of all goods traded between the EEU & Vietnam.
It will save exporters from the EEU about $40-60
million in the first year. Vietnamese companies
can expect savings of up to $5-$10 million a year.

With the deal Hanoi expects to significantly raise
 its foreign trade. Trade with Russia is expected
more than double to $10 billion by 2020.

"Specific conditions will be created for Russia in
 order to increase the supply of its products on
the Vietnamese market. It concerns not only
high value-added products, but also agricultural
produce, consumer goods and so on," said the
Russian Trade Mission in Vietnam.

Russia’s exports to Vietnam, include, nuclear
 reactors, mineral fuels, oil and its distillation
products and fertilizers. Imports from Vietnam
include electrical machinery, boilers & knitwear.

In terms of the agreement, Russian automotive
 companies GAZ, Kamaz & Sollers will be able
 to create joint ventures to produce buses,
trucks, special vehicles, and passenger cars.
 The localization of production is expected to
 reach 40 to 50 percent over the next decade.

Vietnam signed the free trade zone agreement
 with the EEU in 2015, becoming the first non-
regional country to join the bloc.

More than 40 countries and international
organizations, including China, Indonesia,
 Israel and Iran, have expressed interest
 in a free trade deal with the bloc.

Establishment of the EEU was signed by the
 presidents of Russia, Belarus & Kazakhstan
in 2014. Armenia & Kyrgyzstan, joined later.

 The bloc was designed to ensure the free
movement of goods, services, capital and
 workforces, between member countries.



4 of the biggest banks are reported as going down:
HSBC, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank and Wells
 Fargo, are all reported by eminent experts as
"about to fail."


Chinese yuan becomes IMF reserve
currency, first new addition since 1999

The Chinese yuan is now added to the IMF reserve
 basket, becoming the first currency to be added to
 the list, since the emergence of the euro, in 1999.

The official entry brings to a close, at least partly,
Beijing’s years-long struggle
for international
acceptance on the sort of level
enjoyed by
the US dollar. The currency now
joins the
big four: the US dollar, the euro,

the yen, and the UK's pound.

The decision means the Chinese yuan will now be
 used as one of the International Monetary Fund’s
 lending currencies, in emergency bailouts. This
 sort of internationalization is in line with
 China’s wish for an increase in the
 legitimacy of its currency.

The move also evidences China’s growing role
as a power to challenge the global economic
 dominance of the United States.

The IMF has fixed the relative amounts of
the five main currencies in its basket for

five years, based on the exchange rate
each, over the last three months.


Deutsche Bank to fight
US $14bn claim

Deutsche Bank says it will challenge a $14 billion
claim by the US Department of Justice on alleged
mis-selling of mortgage-backed securities during
the 2008 financial crisis.

“Deutsche Bank has no intent to settle these
potential civil claims anywhere near the number
cited. The negotiations are only just beginning.
The bank expects that they will lead to an out-
come similar to those of peer banks which
have settled at materially lower amounts,”
Deutsche Bank says in its statement.

No details on the case have been publicized.
 Yet reports say sales of mortgage securities
 before the 2008 financial crisis, lie at the
 heart of the case.

The claim against Deutsche Bank far exceeds
 its expectations that the DoJ would look for
 a figure of only up to 3 billion euros ($3.4
billion), Reuters reported.

European stocks wrapped up in negative territory
on Friday in reaction to the case against Deutsche
Bank. Royal Bank of Scotland and Barclays both
fell over 5%, while Credit Suisse and UBS fell
over 3%. French lenders BNP Paripas and
Societe Generale both fell over 2%.

Deutsche Bank’s shares stumbled 8.5%, wiping
 off roughly €1.5 billion from the German lenders’
 market capitalization.

Other big banks have reached deals in recent
years with US authorities over their mortgage
 activities in the run-up to the financial crisis.
Earlier in 2016, Goldman Sachs agreed to pay
 $5.1 billion to settle claims on its dealings.


Banking giants reverse predictions
 of post-Brexit ‘Brecession’, proving
 it was the Remain Camp, who lied:

Two of the City’s biggest powerhouses have
scrapped their predictions:  of a post-Brexit
recession which would see the UK economy
 collapse, following the EU referendum - and
now envisage better-than-expected results
 in the third financial quarter.

 But investor Jim Rogers warns that the US
policy of printing money will soon hurt us:

"You should be very worried. There's going to be a
serious economic crisis --- in the next year or two.

We all are going to pay a horrible price for the
artificial money coming out of America, and
 other central banks. We’re all going to have
a huge problem. Be worried, be worried."



China welcomes Canada's decision
 to apply for AIIB membership: Xi

Xinhua - Meeting Canadian PM, Justin Trudeau, Xi
says China is willing to improve communication
 and coordination with Canada, protect an open
& inclusive multilateral trade system with the
 country and deepen cooperation in areas
as climate change, peacekeeping
and marine

This is the first official visit by Trudeau since
taking office in November 2015. His father,
former Canadian PM Pierre Trudeau, was
the first Canadian PM to visit China, after
the establishment of diplomatic relations.

After his stay in Beijing, Trudeau flew
 to Hangzhou, to attend the G20 summit.


World seeing ‘greatest monetary policy
experiment in history’ - Rothschild

 Low interest rates, negative yields on government
 debt & quantitative easing, are part of the biggest
 financial experiment in world history, and the
 consequences are as yet, unknown, says RIT
Capital Partners Chair, Lord Rothschild.

“The six months under review have seen central
 bankers continuing what is surely the greatest
experiment in monetary policy in the history of
 the world. We're therefore in uncharted waters
 and it is impossible to predict the unintended
 consequences of very low interest rates, with
 30% of global government debt --- at negative
 yields, combined with quantitative easing on
 a massive scale,” Rothschild writes, in the
company's semi-annual financial report.

The banker says this policy has led to a rapid
growth of stock markets --- US stocks have
grown 3-fold since 2008 - with investments
 growing and volatility remaining low.

However, the real sector of the economy didn’t
 enjoy such profits, as “growth remains anemic,
 with weak demand and deflation in many parts
 of the developed world,” says Rothschild.

The billionaire stresses that many risks remain
 for the global economy, with the deteriorating
geopolitical situation. Among those risks, he
includes the UK's vote to leave the EU, the
 US' presidential election & China's slowing
economic growth. Another risk is global
terrorism, which Rothschild says is a
consequence of continuing 'conflict'
 in the Middle East.

A Bank of America Merrill Lynch report in June,
shows interest rates in developed countries,
 in particular America’s 0.5%, are now at
their lowest level in 5,000 years.

 In their battle with deflation, countries such
 as Sweden, Switzerland or Japan, have even
 turned to negative key lending rates.

Another woe is negative yields on government
bonds. In June, 10-year German government
bonds dipped below 0% for the first time in

Janus Capital estimates that global yields
are the lowest in 500 years, and the total
amount of such bonds, is $10 trillion.

The investment group’s lead portfolio manager,
 Bill Gross, is calling it a “supernova, that will
 explode one day.”



EU mulls abolishing "non-market economy" list

Xinhua - The European Union (EU) is mulling
abolishing its "non-market economy" list, on
which China & 14 other states are included,
to set up a new, "country-neutral" method,
 & reform its anti-dumping and anti-subsidy
 legislation, it announced, on July 29th.

The decision was made after the EU Commission
held another orientation debate on the treatment
 of China, in anti-dumping investigations, as a 15-
year-old EU "surrogate system" is set to expire,
 in December, 2016.

"Colleagues have agreed to propose changes to
 EU anti-dumping and anti-subsidy legislation --
with the introduction of a new anti-dumping
 methodology," said EU Trade Commissioner
Cecilia Malmstrom in a press briefing.

"We're eliminating the existing list of non-
market economy countries," Malmstrom
 told reporters. "This is a new method, it
will be country-neutral, and applied to
all WTO member countries, equally."

 "This new methodology, would lead to
approximately the same level of anti-
dumping duties as the EU has now"
-- the commissioner said.

EU officials say... the new method will mark
 a "huge change" to the bloc's anti-dumping
& anti-subsidy laws, & the EU Commission
 will have to shoulder the burden, & prove
 there is "market distortion" in its future
 investigations, on a case-by-case basis.

Besides China, other countries on the
 EU "non-market economies" list, are:

 Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus,
 Georgia, the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea, Kazakhstan,
 Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Mongolia,
 Tajikistan, Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan and, last but
not least, Vietnam.


Deficit in UK's Current Account
Remains Unaltered 
 The deficit in the current account of the United
 Kingdom -- after all this austerity -- remains at
an historic maximum.

The need to finance the country from abroad, was
high before the yes for Brexit. The British National
 Office of Statistics shows no change in its initial
 growth estimate for the first quarter -- but shows
that the economy still depends mostly on home
 expenditure and services, for any expansion.

On the other hand, the growth of foreign trade,
 investment and manufacturing, slowed down.

In global terms, the UK economy grew 0.4 %
 in the first three months of 2016, in line with
 forecasts, and was 2% higher than last year.


Americans and Europeans Divided

Over Sanctions Against Russia
Prensa Latina - Almost half of Europeans (47%)
 --- believe that sanctions against Russia should
be lifted --- according to a recent Sputnik Poll.

The poll found that 51% of Italians, 48% of Germans,
& 43% of French respondents, said they agree with
 the lifting of sanctions; according to the consultant
 firms, Ifop and UK Populus.

In contrast, when asked about the same topic, only
 29% of US people, said that they would like to see
 sanctions against Russia lifted.

The poll was conducted by the French opinion and
 marketing research company, Ifop, and UK polling
 agency Populus, for Sputnik News Agency & Radio.

The poll also found that respondents in the US,
are most likely to support extending sanctions.

When asked if sanctions against Russia should
be lifted or extended :  42% of US citizens said
they support extending them.

However, only 31% of respondents in Germany,
 29 per cent in France, and 27 per cent in Italy
agreed with extending sanctions.

The EU's economic sanctions against Russia
 were imposed in 2014.

Analists say that, since the sanctions were
 applied, the EU has had to pay 10 times
more than the US.


 “The Most Corrupt Country
in the World”.

 Journalist & world-renowned expert on the
 Italian mafia Roberto Saviano calls the UK
 “the most corrupt country in the world”.

“If I asked, what's the most corrupt place on
 Earth, you might well tell me it’s Afghanistan
 or maybe Greece, Nigeria, the South of Italy:
 and I will tell you --- it’s the UK,” Saviano told
 the audience at Wales’ Hay Literary Festival.

“It’s not the bureaucracy, it’s not the police,
 & it’s not the politics, but what is corrupt is
the financial capital. Ninety percent of the
 owners of capital in London, have their
headquarters offshore,” he added.

The UK is Europe’s “criminal capital” when it
comes to allowing corruption, the journalist
 thinks, with trust funds in Jersey and British
 Overseas Territory the Cayman Islands,
 being its “access gates.”

“That is why it is important, why it is so crucial
for me to be here today & talk to you;- because
 I want to tell you, this is about you, this is about
 your life, this is about your government,” the
36-year-old journalist told the audience.


Surprise! US Should Be Considered

 as a Tax Haven, EU Report Suggests

New research by the Green/EFA group in the
 European Parliament calls for the USA to be
 considered as a tax haven, following claims
 that it has fallen behind in tax transparency.

The research — which was published ahead
of a special visit to the US by the European
 Parliament's special committee, looking at
 tax avoidance this week, could also cast a
 shadow on the ongoing TTIP negotiations
-- which aim to secure closer trade agree-
ments between Europe and the US.

The report is critical of what it sees as inaction
 on the part of the US ---- in tackling the issue of
 transparency of company ownership and bank
 account info' between tax administrations
 --- arguing that, whilst the EU has made
progress, the US has not.

The report, 'The Role of the US as a Tax
Haven — Implications for Europe' says:

"The US is a major financial centre. It holds almost
 20% of the financial services' world market share
 for non-residents. Foreign assets amounted to
US $16,745 billion in 2013, and foreign direct
investment reached US$2.9 billion in 2014.

However, its transparency legal framework
is not consistent with the responsibility
involved in being a major financial hub."

The German Green MEP Sven Giegold comments
 on the report -- claiming the US has failed to live
 up to standards it requires of other countries:

"The US has made bold moves on the exchange of
 financial information but it is just a one-way street:
its exchange of tax information with other states,
 is more limited and full of loopholes," Giegold says.

Molly Scott Cato - a Green MEP for the UK - argues
 that the US is becoming increasingly attractive --
as a "tax haven" for the world's most wealthy.

Responding to the recent report, she argues for
 greater scrutiny of the US tax regime by the EU:

"The EU should carefully scrutinize the US, in the
 upcoming process of creating a common blacklist
 of tax havens. We should introduce a withholding
 tax on US banks not exchanging information -- as
 the US has done with European banks. We need
the US to sign up to the highest international
standards of transparency."

A fact-finding delegation visited the US between
 17-19 May, as part of the European Parliament's
 special committee investigating tax avoidance
 in the US.


Worst is Yet to Come? US Billionaire
 Warns of Crisis Worse Than 2008

The current situation in the global economy
 is similar to the situation on the eve of the
 crisis of 2008, billionaire trader Stanley
 Druckenmiller says.

According to the businessperson,
the main risk stems from actions
  by the US Federal Reserve.

He criticizes the Federal Reserve for a
 "myopic policy" of low interest rates,
which has led to fast-growing
bullish sentiments, in
the market.

"The bull market is exhausting itself,"
 he said, at the Ira Sohn Investment
Conference, in New York.

The Fed’s easy monetary policy has
 resulted in companies taking on big
debt loads... which they then use to
buy back their shares -- instead of
increasing capital spending.

By keeping interest rates low, the Fed is
 'raising the odds of an economic tail risk
 they are trying to avoid', Druckenmiller
points out.

A big concern, is the uncontrollable growth
of US debt, the investor adds. According to
 him, US corporations are "stuck in the mud,
forlorn of growth, unwilling to invest, and
 addicted to share buybacks, to gin up
 their stocks."

"The Fed has borrowed from future
 consumption more than ever before.
It is the least data-dependent Fed
 in history. This is the longest
 deviation from historical norms
 in terms of Fed dovishness that
 I have ever seen in my career,"
Druckenmiller is quoted as
saying, by CNBC.

"This kind of myopia causes
 reckless behaviour."

According to media reports, Druckenmiller -
 whose net worth is estimated at $4.4 billion
- is making long-term investments in gold...
 while holding short positions on US
companies’ shares.

At the same time, some economists believe
 that the current state of the global economy
 indicates that it may be facing a structural
adjustment - and isn't just the downward
 part of an economic cycle.

In April, the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) announced that the global economy
was expecting growth at 3.2 percent, in
2016, & a further growth of 3.5% in 2017.

"Maybe it is not just an economic cycle
 we are facing, but a kind of structural
adjustment of the world economy that
we do not understand, yet: what the
consequences are, and how to deal
 with this," European Commission
 Europe-Aid head, Jose Correia
Nunes, notes.


Bankers in Prison
--- New Rule?

In October 2015, courts in Iceland handed down
 sentences against 5 bankers who helped usher
in the country’s 2008 financial crisis. Among
the convicted were 3 senior managers from
 Landsbanki Íslands and 2 senior managers
 from Kaupthing Bank. Then suddenly, with
no big hooha, sentences were pronounced
against more bankers working in Iceland.

A total of 26 have been convicted. This is
 the world’s first ruling against the bankers
 who oversaw the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

Is the jig up yet?

On Jan. 11 eleven former employees of Deutsche
 Bank, Barclays, and Société Générale, appeared
in a London court, accused of manipulating the
 Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor), which
sets interest rates on many financial
products, including mortgages.

The Libor and Euribor interbank rates, which
 determine the cost at which banks lend to one
 another, are used to price over $450 trillion of
financial products. Over three years since the
UK bank Barclays, admitted, in 2012, that its
traders had tried to manipulate the Libor &
Euribor rates, between 2005 and 2009,
legal proceedings have begun.

 For many bankers the start of the trial
in London --- was a genuine shock.

In the banking world, where the London law-
suit's currently a hot topic, there're those who
 point out, that only the managers of European
banks are in the dock and they hope that Wall
 Street banks are not next. Others claim that
 the trial in London...  is just the beginning.

 And, finally, a third group is suggesting that it is
 not that hard to figure out which bank managers
 and employees are responsible for misbehaving.

The long silence on the part of the banks and
 regulators, can only be explained by the well-
established bonds of corruption:-  financial
 regulators are always guided by 2 unwritten
 rules in their work. One rule applies to the
banks as legal entities: Too big to fail.

The other applies to the managers
of large banks: Too big to jail.

The lawsuits in Iceland and London are
 the first exceptions to the second rule.


62 billionaires now control
half of world’s wealth

The 44-page report, ‘An Economy for the 1%’,
 published by Oxfam GB for Oxfam International
 (ISBN 978-1-78077-993-5, Jan. 2016, Oxford,
UK) says:

“The gap between rich and poor is reaching new
 extremes: Credit Suisse has recently revealed that
the richest 1% have now accumulated more wealth
than the rest of the world put together. Meanwhile,
 the wealth owned by the bottom half of humanity,
has fallen by a trillion dollars in the past 5 years.
This is just the latest evidence that today we live
 in a world with levels of inequality we may not
have seen for over a century.”

The poorest 50% of the world’s population is now
 worth an estimated $1.76 trillion --- which is also
 the estimated net worth of the richest 62 people.

In 2010, it required the richest 388 persons to
 make up the wealth of the bottom 50%. Since
then, the world’s richest 62 persons have added
 44% to their cash and assets -- while the wealth
of the bottom half has dropped by 41%, despite
the rise in the global population by 400 million.

In the same period, the wealth of the richest 62
 persons increased by $500 billion to $1.76 trillion.

 Within 5 years, the majority of the world’s wealth
 has been consolidated into the hands of less than
 one-sixth of the number of persons who used to
 control it.

Nine out of 10 World Economic Forum corporate
 partners had a presence in at least 1 tax haven.

 It's estimated that tax dodging by multinational
 corporations costs developing countries at least
 $100 billion every year. Corporate investment in
 tax havens almost quadrupled from 2000 to 2014.

The report cited estimates that billionaires have
 $7.6 trillion in offshore accounts. This amount
 is more than the joint GDP of the UK & Germany.

 It is said that, if tax were paid on the income this
 wealth generates, an extra $190 billion would be
 available to governments --- every year.


  EU Tries ending Tax
              Evasion by Multinationals  
 Prensa Latina - The European Union loses up to
 70 billion euros a year --- due to tax evasion by
 multinationals --- estimates the regional bloc,
it announces measures to contain this.

According to the Economic Affairs Commissioner,
 Pierre Moscovici, the transnationals' aggressive
 fiscal engineering, reduces the public coffers of
 the 28 member countries of the EU, by amounts
 fluctuating between 50 - 70 billion euros a year.

In remarks to journalists, Moscovici says these
practices generate a competitive disadvantage
 for local businesses -- and increase the fiscal
 burden for all other tax payers.

Moscovici says the Commission's plan needs
the approval of the 28 member countries and
 considers that the negotiations, as is usual
 over fiscal matters, will not be easy.

Under the proposal, 6 tax practices linked
to aggressive fiscal engineering, would be
 banned - including the transfer of benefits
 to subsidiaries placed in countries where
 lower taxes are paid.

The initiative also tries to prevent dividends
 or profits arriving to the EU from third states
 from enjoying tax exemption, when it hasn't
 been charged in the nations of origin.

Under the package, multinationals will 
have to give specific information to the
 fiscal authorities of the country where
 the headquarters are based and, if it is
 outside the EU, the responsibility will
 fall on the subsidiary.


Europe Bank Rout
Erases $434 Billion,
 Twice Greek Economy.

The plunge in European bank stocks over the past
six months, has wiped out about 400 billion euros
 ($434 billion) in market value --- over twice the
 annual output of Greece at current prices.

The STOXX Europe 600 Banks Index, grouping
 46 lenders, has dropped twice as much as the
 region’s benchmark share index since late July.

 Banking stocks have fallen 14% in January alone,
 heading for their worst monthly performance since
 the depths of Europe’s 2011 sovereign-debt crisis.

Deutsche Bank AG and Standard Chartered Plc
are each down by over 40 percent, since July.


US Companies Led the World in
Debt Defaults in 2015, S&P Says
More US companies defaulted on their debt in 2015
than issuers from any other country or region, S&P
 analysts say, in their December reports.

111 companies worldwide defaulted on their
 obligations, the highest tally since 2009 when
 the figure hit 242 for the same period.

 About 60 percent of last year’s global defaults
came from US borrowers, up from 55 percent in
 2014, when 33 of 60 defaulters, were US ones.

After the US, companies from emerging markets
 were the second-largest defaulters, accounting
for 23 percent of the pool, which was a smaller
share than in 2014, according to S&P's data.

Plummeting oil prices and speculation about
how the Federal Reserve’s plan to tighten
monetary policy would affect corporate
borrowing costs has made companies
 more vulnerable, expert Vazza says.

“The current crop of US speculative-grade
issuers appears fragile, and particularly
susceptible to sudden, or unanticipated
 shocks,” she wrote, on December 24th.

Arch Coal Inc. was the most recent,
 with its credit rating downgraded to
“speculative default” by Standard &
Poor’s last week -- after the coal
producer missed about $90 million
 in interest payments, & exercised
 a 30-day grace period, with the
 holders of some of its notes.

Bloomberg.com reports that shale is now
running out of survival tricks, as OPEC
ramps up the pressure.

Looking ahead, S&P expects the US corporate
 default rate to rise to 3.3 percent by September
 2016 from 2.5 percent a year earlier.

The bulk of the failures to come from companies
 in the oil and gas sector, which accounted for
about a quarter of 2015’s defaults.



While the mainstream media focus on ISIS
 extremists, a threat that has gone virtually
 unreported is that your life savings could be
 wiped out in a massive derivatives collapse.

 Bank bail-ins have begun in Europe, and the
 infrastructure is in place in the US. Poverty
also kills. At the end of November, an Italian
 pensioner hanged himself after his entire
 €100,000 savings were confiscated, in a
bank “rescue” scheme.

 He left a suicide note blaming the bank,
 where he'd been a customer for 50 years
and had invested in bank-issued bonds.

 But he might better have blamed the EU
 and the G20’s Financial Stability Board,
which imposed an “Orderly Resolution”
 regime, to keep insolvent banks afloat
--- by confiscating the savings
of investors and depositors.

 Some 130,000 shareholders and junior
 bond holders suffered losses by “rescue.”   




Obama agrees - signs IMF Reform

A special communique of the G20 on the subject
of the IMF adopted at the G20 summit in Turkey
 --- and signed by US President Obama --- urges
the US to ratify IMF reforms agreed in 2010.

This reform implies that the US will have to give
 up its blocking stake of votes in the IMF and the
 fund itself, will cease to depend on Washington


US saddled with
debts of $65 trillion:

Former US comptroller

When all the US's unfunded liabilities are added up,
 the national debt is 3 times more than the oft-cited
 figure of $18 trillion, states Dave Walker, former
US' Comptroller General.

The real US national debt is about $65 trillion,
says Mr Walker, who headed the Government
 Accountability Office (GAO) --- under former
Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

“If you end up adding to that $18.5 trillion -- the
 unfunded civilian & military pensions & retiree
 healthcare, the additional underfunding for Social
 Security, the additional underfunding for Medicare,
and the various commitments and contingencies
 that the federal government has, the real number
is about $65 trillion rather than $18 trillion, and it’s
growing automatically --- absent reforms,” Walker
 tells John Catsimatidis on “The Cats Roundtable”
on New York’s AM-970.

Walker, in charge of ensuring federal spending is
 fiscally responsible, says a large national debt
hinders the US government’s ability to conduct
domestic and foreign policy initiatives.

“If you don’t keep your economy strong, and
that means to be able to generate more jobs
 and opportunities, you are not going to be
strong internationally, with regard to
 foreign policy,” he notes.

He adds that such a problem prevents
 the country from investing “in national
defense and homeland security.”

Walker goes on to say that US citizens
 have “lost touch with reality”, when
it comes to spending.

He calls on Democrats and Republicans
to set aside partisan politics in order to
band together to tackle the problem.

“You can be a Democrat or a Republican,
you can be unaffiliated, you can be what-
ever you want, but your duty of loyalty
needs to be to country, rather than to
 party, & we need to solve some of the
 large, known, and growing problems
 that we have,” he says.


IMF warns: Saudi Arabia
may go bankrupt by 2020

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) warns in a
 report, that Saudi Arabia may run out of financial
 assets within 5 years, if the government keeps to
its current policies.

Saudi Arabia is expected to run a budget deficit
of 21.6% in 2015 and 19.4% in 2016, according to
the IMF’s latest regional economic outlook. The
 state needs to adjust its spending, the IMF urges.

The IMF says the region’s outlook is currently
 being shaped by several key factors ---- the
 most important of which include deepening
regional conflicts, and slumping oil prices.

The conflicts have given rise to large numbers
of displaced people and refugees, on a scale
not seen since the early 1990s, according
to the report.

“Achieving fiscal sustainability over the
medium-term will be especially challenging
 -- given the need to create jobs for the over
 10 million people anticipated to be looking
 for work by 2020 in the region’s oil exporting
 countries,” IMF Middle East and Central Asia
 Department Director, Masood Ahmed, told
media, after unveiling the report in Dubai.

“For the region’s oil exporters, the fall in
prices has led to a large fall in revenue,
amounting to a staggering $360 billion
this year alone,” Masood Ahmed said.

OPEC members Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq,
Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, Algeria and Libya
have all seen revenues drop sharply,
 as a result of a decline in oil prices.

Saudi Arabia is currently facing a
 budget deficit for the first time
since 2009.

Oil sales account for 80% of revenues.
 It has prompted the government to cut
spending, delay projects and sell bonds.

The country’s net foreign assets fell by
 about $82 billion from Jan. to August.

The government sold state bonds worth
 $15 billion (55 billion riyals) this year.

The budget deficit has caused project
 layoffs in Saudi Arabia.

Firms working on infrastructure projects
 haven’t been paid for 6 months, or more.
Payment delays increased lately, as the
government wants to cut prices on
 contracts, in order to preserve cash.


Growth momentum still huge in
 Chinese economy: People's Daily
China's economy still has huge momentum,
 "as structural readjustment will transform
 challenges into strengths in the long run,"
says a commentary in the People's Daily,
the flagship newspaper of the Communist
 Party of China.

China's GDP last year posted its weakest
annual expansion in 24 years, mainly
 resulting from a housing slowdown,
 weakening domestic demand and
unsteady exports.

Economic growth slowed further,
to 7% in the first half of this year.

A 7% rise is not an easy achievement in
 a slowing world economy, & the rate is
among the highest in major economies,
 Premier Li Keqiang says, at the Summer
Davos forum in northeast China's Dalian.

"China is the source of global growth," Li says,
 adding the country has sufficient policy tools
 to reform the macro-economy, and will keep
rolling out targeted & innovative measures
 to counter downward pressure.

China contributed roughly 30 percent of world
 economic growth, in the first half of this year.


UN Principles Against Vulture Funds,
Victory for Argentina    

It was worth the fight, said president Cristina
 Fernández on TV, after the UN voted by a big
majority, to approve a resolution with the
principles that create a legal framework
 to protect the process of exchange in
paying off debts.

The UN principles of sovereignty are:

 good faith, transparency, impartiality,
 equitable treatment, sovereign immunity,
 legitimacy, sustainability, & restructuring
 of the majority.

Cristina Fernández --- over the year it took ---
 defended the need to establish a legal frame-
work that protects restructuring of sovereign
debts --- from speculation by financial groups
known as 'vulture' funds.

The proposal was received and sponsored by the
 Group of 77 plus China, which upheld it until now.

Argentinean Minister of Economy, Axel Kicillof
said this approval not only favors his country,
 but all the rest, including developed countries
going through a process of crisis.

Although the resolution by the General Assembly
 isn't obligatory, it constitutes a fundamental step
 against the attacks of vulture funds, like those
 Argentina is suffering today and other countries
 too, affirmed Kicillof.

Cristina Fernandez thanked the 136 nations who
voted 'yes' and the 41 states which abstained,
 "as we know of the pressures they're against."
She also congratulated the diplomatic and
economic teams that made it possible.


The World Bank, using PPP calculations,
 has Russia's economy above Germany's.

 Its top five -- in order -- are:
China, the US, India, Japan
 and Russia.

 It puts BRICS GDP at 96% of the G7's.

 The world is changing.


'Largest-ever' Mediterranean
gas field discovered

Italian energy company Eni says it's discovered the
 Mediterranean Sea's "largest-ever" gas reservoir ---
off Egypt.


Justice Ministry drafts bill proposing
legalizing seizure of foreign state assets

Kommersant business daily writes that Russia's
 Justice Ministry has developed a bill, according
to which, any state’s property in Russia can be
seized, in proportion to the amount of Russian
 assets frozen in that country.  Presently, the
bill is approved by a designated committee.

"The number of lawsuits against Russia in
foreign courts is steadily rising," says the
Justice Ministry, "and no one is asking
Russia to agree to participate."

The ministry notes that in several countries
 Russian property now has "limited juridical
immunity," which is why a special law is
needed to guarantee a "balance" on the
basis of the "reciprocity principle."

"Currently, it is possible to seize foreign
government assets when there is a court
 order," says Dmitry Matveyev, executive
 partner of Dmitry Matveyev & Partners
 Law Firm.

 He does not see a special law as necessary,
 but notes that if the law is passed, it will not
 contradict international law.

"Any court or arbitration institute can ‘deprive’
 a foreign government of immunity if it is guided
 by the applicable law," says Marat Davletbayev,
partner from Nektorov, Saveliev and Partners
 Law Firm.

But Davletbayev also warns that the court of
the country whose property was deprived of
immunity, can refuse to recognize this, and
implement the decision of the Russian court.


Transit Gas Through Ukraine
Politically Motivated by EU

Sputnik – The EU is trying to maintain the transit
of Russian gas via Ukraine, for political reasons,
 Russia's Envoy to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, says.

"I think they have the ultimate goal of keeping
 Ukrainian transit, as a purely political stance.
 It doesn't have any economic basis," he says,
 answering questions in an interview with RIA
Novosti, on why Brussels is not seeking to
enhance co-operation with Russia on the
Turkish Stream gas pipeline project, via the
Black Sea and Greece, bypassing Ukraine.

The European Union won't be able to continue
 giving Kiev financial support, if Ukraine now
announces a default, due to the EU's own
legislation, Vladimir Chizhov says.

"Yes, if a default is announced, they cannot
continue financial support according to the
EU's legislation," he says, in the interview.

The EU is -- to a certain extent -- standing on
the sidelines in Ukraine's conflict settlement
 process, Russia's Envoy to the EU, says.

"Two EU members are participating in the
Normandy format negotiations on the
settlement of the situation in Ukraine,
 and they are both operating in their
national capacity.

"The European structures, as well as US
 representatives -- for obvious reasons --
are not engaged [in the talks]," he says.

The EU is supporting the Kiev authorities,
 who have repeatedly violated the Minsk
agreements, instead of putting pressure
on them, Russia's Envoy to the EU says.

“It's not the first time Kiev has violated the
Minsk agreements. I think this is obvious
 to every unbiased observer, but here [in
 the European Union] they do not even
 think about it. Instead [of imposing
sanctions on Ukraine], they just repeat
 their support for the authorities in Kiev,”
he says, in an interview with RIA Novosti.


‘No mandate or moral right tosay yes’:
Greece rejects ‘generous’ EU bailout

It’s up to the Greek people, Tsipras says,
make a fateful decision on Greece’s
sovereignty, independence and future.


If Anti-Russia Sanctions Stay...

According to WIFO’s assessment, Germany will
shoulder the main burden. 500,000 jobs now are
under the threat of liquidation in Germany. The
 German economy will lose €27 billion and its
GDP will contract by 1% in the coming years,
according to experts’ estimates.

Italy will lose over 200,000 jobs and 0.9% of GDP
 while France’s losses will amount to 150,000 jobs
 and 0.5% of GDP. Poland, Estonia and Spain will
suffer too. Germany has already lost 175,000
 working places with 290,000 more to be lost,
 if the sanctions war continues.

The unemployment rate may rise by 185,000
 in Poland, 135,000 in Italy, 115,000 in Spain,
95,000 in France, 80,000 in the UK & 75,000
 in Estonia. If we include Switzerland, the EU
 has already lost 950,000 working places.
 With the sanctions in force, unemployment
 will rise by 1,460,000.


Anti-Russian Sanctions Can Cost EU
 Up to $114 Billion - Austrian Study
Sputnik - The European Union could lose up to
 €100 billion ($114 billion) over its anti-Russian
 sanctions if things remain unchanged, a study
by Austria's Institute of Economic Research,

Die Welt newspaper reports that the research,
conducted exclusively for the Leading European
 Newspaper Alliance (LENA), considers a worst-
case scenario, if the sanctions remain in place.

“If the situation does not change fundamentally,
 our most pessimistic scenario will come true,”
one of the research authors, Oliver Fritz, is
 quoted as saying, by Die Welt.

According to their calculations, the current
 political situation could also affect over 2
 million EU jobs, through declining exports.

In contrast to the analysts’ forecast, the
European Commission says the losses of
 the European Union are “relatively small
 and manageable,” the newspaper says.

Since March 2014, the US, EU, and other
 western countries have sanctioned Russia’s
 banking, defense & energy sectors, over its
 alleged role in the Ukrainian crisis. Moscow
 has repeatedly denied those allegations.

In August, Moscow imposed a year-long food
embargo on the countries that sanctioned it.

The decision on the extension of anti-Russian
 sanctions is due to be made next week at the
 meeting of EU foreign ministers. Moscow vows
new countermeasures -- if sanctions are kept.


Two Can Play This Game: Russia Warns:
 Belgium Asset Freeze Works Both Ways
Sputnik - Russia's Foreign Ministry summoned
 the Belgian ambassador, informing him that
Russia may adopt reciprocal measures --- if
 the recent asset seizures are not reversed.

A Belgian court instructed Wednesday, that
47 Belgian & Russian companies be stripped
 of assets of 1.65 billion euros ($1.87 billion),
 in connection with a settlement awarded to
 exYukos shareholders by a Dutch arbitration
 court. Russia's Justice Minister, Alexander
Konovalov, says Belgium's legal arguments
 for seizing Russian property are unclear, &
Russia has requested information on this,
through diplomatic channels.

"Belgium's ambassador was informed that
 the Russian side considers such acts by
competent authorities of the Kingdom of
Belgium, as openly unfriendly acts and
flagrant violations of the universally
recognized norms of international
the ministry statement says.

The ministry calls on Belgium to take
immediate acts to restore the property
 of Russian organizations. The seizures
 appear to be made under the auspices
 of the European Energy Charter Treaty,
which Russia signed, but did not ratify.

"Otherwise, the Russian side will be
 forced to consider adopting appropriate
 response measures, regarding assets
 of the Kingdom of Belgium," it adds.

French authorities also began seizing
Russian state-owned property earlier
 on Thursday. France seized the bank
 accounts of Rossiya Segodnya news
 agency, of which, Sputnik is a part.

The organization's real estate wasn't seized,
as the organization does not own any real
 estate in France, & employees continue to
 access rented buildings without hindrance.

French economist and professor at Moscow
 School of Economics, Jacques Sapir, says
the French government's decision threatens
 to create a "cold war" climate between the
 two countries, and the attacks show how
the West intends to deal with the rise in
influence of Russia's alternative media.


India confirms bid to
join Russia-led bloc

India has confirmed that it will sign a free trade
 agreement with the Eurasian Economic Union
(EEU) -- a Russia-led bloc which is attracting
more emerging powers. 

TASS news agency quotes a senior diplomat at
 the Indian embassy in Russia, saying that New
Delhi will be “definitely signing this agreement".

Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and
Kyrgyzstan are members of the EEU which
started operation on January 1st, with the
 aim of regional economic integration.

China, Vietnam, Iran, Egypt & Israel, have
 also indicated their interest in joining the
 EEU free trade zone which guarantees the
free transit of goods, services, capital and
 workers, among its members.

Last month, the union gave the initial go-
ahead to signing a free trade agreement
with Iran, a senior EEU official says.

Russia's representative on the Eurasian
Economic Commission board, Andrey
Slepnev, says the Iran proposal was
 approved by all the panel members, 
at an expert-level meeting, held
 in Armenia's capital, Yerevan.

He adds that discussions with China
on joining the union will begin soon,
Xinhua news agency says.

Currently the EEU has a combined population
 of 170 million people, and a gross domestic
 product of $2.7 trillion, and is being tipped
 as a major economic force to challenge the
 might of the European Union and the US.

Russian President Vladimir Putin is also
 calling for a regional currency union, as
it will make it "easier to react to external
 financial & economic threats, & protect
 our joint market".


Australia, China sign landmark
 free trade agreement

Xinhua - The Australian & Chinese governments
 signed a long-awaited, "monumental" free trade
 agreement in Canberra, last month, lifting most
 of the import tariffs between the two countries.
The landmark signing by Australia's Trade Minister
 Andrew Robb and China's Commerce Minister Gao
 Hucheng finalized negotiations that began 10 years
 ago and follows the Declaration of Intent signed in
 November by the countries' leaders, Tony Abbott
 and Xi Jinping.
PM Abbott says the "unprecedented" and
 "monumental" pact is the "next chapter"
in strong relations between the countries.
On full implementation of the wide-ranging
 agreement, tariffs are to be lifted on 95%
of Australian exports, hurdles for Chinese
businesses to invest in Australia will be
 lowered, and more visas for Chinese
holidaymakers will be granted.
China is Australia's largest trading partner,
with trade in goods and services last year
exceeding 135 billion U.S. dollars - almost
a quarter of Australia's total world trade. 

Australia FTA to spur more regional deals

 China and Australia's landmark free trade
 agreement, with a recent deal with South
Korea, is expected to serve as a positive
example --- and help advance economic
 integration in the Asia-Pacific region.

Under the deal, 85.4% of bilateral exports will
be tariff-free immediately after it takes effect.

When ChAFTA is fully implemented, 97%
 of Australian products to China and all
Chinese products to Australia, will
enjoy tariff-free entry. 

China has been Australia's largest trade
partner since 2010, and Australia was
China's eighth largest trade partner in
2014, says MOFCOM's statement.

Compared with other free trade agreements
 with China, ChAFTA has a broader tariff-free
 coverage, Tu Xinquan, executive director of
 the China Institute of WTO Studies, tells the
 Global Times.

China & South Korea signed a free trade
agreement on June 1 which will remove
 tariffs on about 90% of products traded
 between the two countries, in 20 years.

Australia & China have complementary
industries, so removing tariffs won't put
 undue pressure on China's enterprises,
 Chen Fengying, research fellow, China
Institute of Contemporary International
Relations, tells the Global Times.

China mainly imports minerals, such as iron
 ore, from Australia & exports manufacturing
 products like clothing & telecommunications
 equipment to the country, according to the
 website of the Australian Department of
Foreign Affairs and Trade.

As for agriculture, Tu says Australian products
 can meet the needs of China's growing middle
class and spur domestic producers to improve.

China's dairy industry, for example, is expected
to work harder for survival as it faces Australian
 competition, when tariffs gradually reduce.

Australia first country to open service
sector to China.

In addition to the removal of tariffs, Australia is
the first country in the world to open its service
sector to China, with a negative list.

The two countries have mutually granted most-
favored-nation status, and reduced the review
 threshold for corporate investments.

"ChAFTA is a comprehensive and high-level
free trade agreement," Chen says.

Most free trade agreements mainly focus on goods
 and services, yet ChAFTA includes lowering review
 thresholds for investments, & in some other areas
 such as e-commerce, & government procurement,
 she says.

China's FTAs with Australia & South Korea, are
 expected to persuade more in the Asia-Pacific
region to join the trend, observers say.

China, South Korea and Japan have discussed
a trilateral free trade agreement since 2013...
 but have not reached a final agreement.

If bilateral ties between China and Japan can
 be improved, it is possible to have a trilateral
 free trade zone, Chen says, noting that the
China-South Korea FTA, has placed some
 pressure on Japan.

Also on Wednesday, the Japanese Chamber
 of Commerce and Industry (JCCI) released its
 2015 Japanese Business in China White Paper,
which says the JCCI expects China, Japan &
S. Korea to OK a free trade agreement 'soon'.

Japan has been involved in talks on the US-led
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), but
 this trade initiative has not progressed much,
 in recent years.


NZ to invest $87m in
Asian infrastructure bank

New Zealand's government announces that
the country will invest NZ$125 million ($87.27
million) in the Asian Infrastructure Investment
Bank (AIIB), over five years.


Hungary becomes 1st EU country
to join China’s Silk Road project
Hungary has become the first European country
 to join the Chinese 'Silk Road’ project, aimed at
 strengthening ties between Asia and Europe &
 developing trade & infrastructure in the region.

The foreign ministers of China and Hungary
have signed a memorandum of understanding
on the New Silk Road, also known as the"One
Belt, One Road" project in Budapest, the
Chinese Foreign Ministry states on its
web-site, Reuters reports.

In March, Chinese President Xi Jinping said
trade among the project’s participants would
he hoped, exceed $2.5 trillion in one decade.

Hungary hopes to intensify cooperation with
 China that can speed up the construction of
 the Hungarian-Serbia railway & other projects,
says the country’s President Janos Ader, as
 quoted by the Chinese foreign ministry.

China is financing and constructing a rail-
way between Hungary and Serbia.

The Chinese government is to inject dozens of
 billions of dollars to support the project via the
building of railways, highways, power grids, oil
& gas pipelines, maritime & infrastructure links
 across Central, West and South Asia to Europe,
increasing the connection between the East
 and the West.


US to Lose Its Ground
Under BRICS Pressure

 © Sputnik/ Alexei Druzhinin

Blind adherence to US policies & introducing
 anti-Russia sanctions, was fatal for Europe,
as the Russia-China-BRICS axis is about to
overturn the global economic system, and
prevail over US' hegemony, states the chief
 economist of Germany's Bremer Landesbank.

The real damage to EU countries caused by
 the launch of anti-Russian sanctions is much
 more comprehensive than that estimated by
 statistics, Folker Hellmeyer, chief economist
of Germany's Bremer Landesbank says, in
an interview with the German publication,
Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten.

“The slump in German export volumes of 18% in
 2014 and by 34% for the first two months of 2015
 is just the tip of the iceberg,” he says. “There are
many more side-effects.”

“European countries, like Finland and Austria,
with strong developing businesses in Russia,
are placing fewer orders within Germany.
 Moreover, Europe's corporations are evading
 these sanctions and creating high-efficiency
 production facilities in Russia. We, therefore,
 lose this potential capital stock -- the basis
 of our prosperity -- and Russia wins.”

The relationship of trust between Russia and
 Germany and the EU is somewhat broken. And
 it will take years to rebuild it. As a result, such
 companies as Siemens and Alstom have lost
 major Russian projects, he says. The potential
 damage -- not only for Germany but the whole
 EU -- therefore, is much more comprehensive
 than what's being shown by current figures.

Meanwhile, Moscow, Beijing and other BRICS
 countries, are looking forward to building the
largest project in modern history: construction
 of new Eurasian infrastructure, from Moscow
 to Vladivostok, in South China, and in India.

Participation by Western countries in these
 mega-projects looks quite uncertain, he says.

“For me, the conflict has already been set,” he says.